If you’re getting the feeling like the globalists are really pushing hard for WWIII these days, you’re not alone. In the past few months there has been multiple instances of European and US officials hinting at the possibility of a new military draft, the EU has talked openly about boots on the ground in Ukraine, NATO officials have stated unequivocally that they WILL NOT accept a loss in Ukraine to the Russians and the Kremlin has warned once again that nuclear weapons are on the table if western troops enter the war. The US government has recently asserted that Ukraine will be joining NATO, a red line in the sand for Russia.
Then there’s Israel and Gaza. I warned months ago in my article ‘It’s A Trap! The Wave Of Repercussions As The Middle East Fights “The Last War”’ that the war in Gaza would expand into a multi-front conflict that would probably include Iran. I also warned that it would be to Israel’s benefit if Iran entered the war because this would force the US to become directly involved. To be sure, Iran has already been engaging in proxy attacks on Israel through Lebanon, but Israel’s attack on the Iranian “embassy” or diplomatic station in Syria basically ensures that Iran will now directly commit to strikes on Israeli targets.
In other words, much like WWI, the situation is being escalated by the political elites despite the fact that the general public in the west is increasingly opposed to participating in the conflict. The globalists want to send us to war whether we like it or not. Every decision they have made so far makes peaceful resolution impossible.
One saving grace that is perhaps new in the entire history of geopolitics is that the public is far more awake and aware of the fact that it’s not necessarily their “duty” to blindly go fight when their government calls on them to do so. Social media has also given a platform for people to widely voice their concerns about war, whereas in the past objectors felt isolated.
Obviously, some of this is based purely on fear – A large percentage of Gen Z is unequipped mentally or physically to go to war, which is why more than 70% of potential military recruits today are rejected before they even get to boot camp. These are many of the same young people who post Ukrainian flags to their social media profiles and jump headfirst into anti-Russian rhetoric, but now that they are faced with the possibility of having to sacrifice themselves for Ukraine they are angry and terrified.
However, there is also a large contingent of capable (and mostly conservative) men with the background and the aptitude for combat that still want nothing to do with Ukraine. The reason is simple: They believe that far-left western governments and globalists want to use them as cannon fodder to get rid of them. Once they are used up in war, there will be no one left to appose the leftist takeover at home.
For most of us in America, Ukraine is irrelevant and we grow tired of wars in the Middle East. Whether left or right, we have no interest in fighting for them. But that’s not going to matter much, at least in terms of preventing a global war.
European Fear Mongering
War with Russia will depend more on European involvement than US involvement. While the US has been the largest provider of armaments to Ukraine by far, the ultimate goal I believe is to integrate European troops into the Ukrainian front, which would be an automatic declaration of global war.
The basis for mobilization of troops from Europe is “domino theory” propaganda. We’ve heard some of it here in America but nowhere near the same level as the EU populace. Governments assert that Russia’s goal is to clear Ukraine as a pathway to invade the rest of Europe. This is the same claim used as justification for the US war in Vietnam: “If we let one country fall to the enemy, all the surrounding countries will fall also.”
Both Ukrainian and NATO leadership suggests that war must continue in Ukraine in order to contain it. There has been no serious discussion of diplomacy, which is utterly bizarre considering the stakes involved. A peace proposal should have been broached the moment the war kicked off and there should have been ongoing efforts to come to an agreement. Instead, even limited peace talks have been thwarted before they truly begin.
A military draft in Europe is far more likely to succeed, given the socialist nature of the population and the fact that only a tiny percentage of civilians are armed to defend themselves. Even with a public protest movement I have little doubt EU governments will be able to secure a large enough force to send into Ukraine and escalate the war.
According to the evidence, it’s clear that some NATO troops have already been deployed to Ukraine and have been there for some time. As I’ve noted in past articles, the strategies used during the first Ukrainian counter-attack were far too advanced for Ukrainian troops and leadership to pull off without help. Anti-armor tactics in particular were very familiar; similar in execution to tactics used by US and British special forces. Not surprisingly, as soon as foreign mercenary recruit rates dropped off, Ukraine’s momentum fizzled.
The Russians are likely well aware of this situation, but as long as smaller groups of soldiers can be sent under the guise of mercenary forces, there’s not much they can do about it. It’s the open deployment of NATO battalions that is cause for greater worry.
There is zero basis for the domino narrative. Not once has Russia indicated since the start of the conflict that they intend to invade the EU. In fact, Putin has long stated that the war in Ukraine is about protecting the separatists of the Donbas region from Ukrainian reprisal, and about the continued escalation of NATO armament.
My suspicions about Putin’s connections to the globalists aside, if we look at the war from a basic cost/benefit analysis there is really nothing for Russia to gain by threatening Europe.
Then there’s the problem of logistics. If Russia is supposedly struggling in Ukraine, how could they have the means to fight on an expanded front against the combined military might of Europe and the US? The only end result would be nuclear war, which both sides would lose. But if you look at the situation objectively, there is a group of people out there that have a lot to gain…
Attacks On Russian Interior Accelerate
Smaller attacks on Russian supplies as well as civilians have been escalating in the past month. The terror attack in Moscow (which US intel blames on ISIS) resulted in the deaths of at least 130 people and drone attacks are threatening oil depots along with other resources. In the grand scheme of the war these attacks are inconsequential, but they will undoubtedly lead to extensive bombardment of Ukrainian cities and the further disablement of Ukrainian infrastructure. Power, water and other utilities will be destroyed and a resource crisis will ensue.
Compared to the US invasion of Iraq, Russia has managed to keep civilian casualties in Ukraine very low. But, each new attack on Russian soil instigates a larger Russian retaliation. And maybe this is the goal – To get the Russians to crater a larger Ukrainian population center thereby giving NATO an excuse to send troops to the region.
Iran And The Oil Imperative
In the Middle East the primary driver for international involvement is oil. We all know this. But oil access is not the end goal to the war in Gaza, just a mechanism for getting the US involved.
I’ll reiterate here that I don’t care which side started the fight or how far back the conflict supposedly goes in history. This is irrelevant. What I do know is that Hamas started this particular war by killing civilians in Israel and you should not start a war unless you’re willing to accept the consequences. That said, I do find it suspicious that Israel’s defensive measures were so useless that they were completely unaware of the Hamas incursion until it was too late.
In any case the conflagration is guaranteed to bring in other larger military elements. Iran is going to enter the fray now, there’s no way around it. This might happen first in the form of economic warfare, and the Strait of Hormuz is the most likely target. Shutting down 30% of the world’s oil traffic would be disastrous for the west. So, America’s entry is thus also guaranteed.
Col. Douglas MacGregor: A Message for Israel
The Inflation Factor, US Elections And How Globalists Benefit
Joe Biden has been struggling for the past three years to manipulate oil prices down by dumping strategic reserves on the market. By artificially keeping oil prices down he keeps energy prices down, and by keeping energy prices down he reduces the growth of CPI.
The Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil depots have helped to spike gas prices in the past month exactly because Russian oil is still being purchased by western countries through back channels. You can’t just cut off one of the largest energy suppliers in the world without huge effects on prices at the pump. And these attacks are revealing how sensitive the oil market is to the slightest threat to supply.
Any major conflict in the Middle East will seal the deal and gas prices will explode. Inflation is not just going to be the death knell of Biden’s presidency (assuming presidential elections still matter), it’s going to be the death knell of the leftists and globalists overall UNLESS they can delay a larger economic calamity until they have a scapegoat, or, until they can start a massive war.
That scapegoat will either be Trump and conservatives, or, Russia and the BRICS (or both). If Trump replaces Biden in 2025 then a crash will be fast and assured and it will be blamed on conservative movements. If Biden stays in a crash will be slower but will still hit hard after it can be blamed on the widening wars.
Then there’s the scenario of globalists securing a war BEFORE elections take place. Perhaps with the intention of preventing or delaying the vote. Perhaps with the intention of creating enough chaos that the vote can be rigged, or giving the impression that it was rigged, triggering civil unrest. Perhaps with the intention of declaring martial law.
Obviously, this is where the globalists benefit; either by preventing conservatives from taking power or by embroiling conservatives in a global calamity that they eventually get blamed for. Keep in mind that any conservative/independent opposition to the globalist establishment can now be accused of “Russian collusion.”
What’s the value of this? Well, it’s an age-old strategy for demonizing freedom fighters – If they are seen by the public as fellow citizens fighting for their rights, then they might be treated as heroes. But, if they’re painted as foreign assests and terrorists seeking to destabilize society, then the public sees them as villains. It’s just another advantage that explains why globalists seem so intent on creating a world war.
I believe that the reason the establishment is pressing so hard for WWIII is partly because of the upcoming elections and also because their covid agenda failed. Covid lockdowns and the vaccine passport system were their big play to create a permanent authoritarian environment with the ability to crush conservative groups that refused to submit. And no matter how you slice it they didn’t get what they wanted. World war is the natural Plan B.
It’s important to understand that every crisis created by globalists is meant to destroy the freedom minded. The true target is not Russia or Iran; they are peripheral. These events are designed to create an environment conducive to tyranny, they act as cover for engineered economic collapse, and they act as cover for the REAL war against those people that still defend liberty.
You could say that WWIII has already started, at least in economic terms. I also highly doubt that the end game for the globalists is a worldwide nuclear exchange; why spend decades building a massive control grid only to vaporize it all in seconds? I do think the danger of kinetic warfare is skyrocketing and that US and European citizens will be directly affected. It will take a sizable resistance movement to change the path we are being forced to follow, and things will get much worse before they get better.
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
As the world moves away from dollars and toward Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), is your 401(k) or IRA really safe? A smart and conservative move is to diversify into a physical gold IRA. That way your savings will be in something solid and enduring. Get your FREE info kit on Gold IRAs from Birch Gold Group. No strings attached, just peace of mind. Click here to secure your future today.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
You can also follow me at –
TwitterX: @AltMarket1
Will our sheriffs be the final answer if all else fails to save what’s left of this Republic??
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2024/04/10/this-is-the-only-realistic-way-of-preventing-a-total-communist-takeover-of-the-usa/
An Open Letter to All County Sheriffs
Dear County Sheriffs:
We citizens are writing to share information you may not be aware of and to ask for your help at this moment.
We acknowledge your great value. Some of us have only recently comprehended your high position in our country.
Few people correctly realize the Sheriff is the highest constitutional executive authority in the county. They have the legitimate authority to prevent federal agents from entering the county – and, if necessary, to throw them out once there.
Now at this challenging time for citizens and for our Constitution, we come to see that the Sheriffs are in a very special and sacred place.
You have taken the oath of office which creates a Sacred Duty to Protect and Defend the Citizens against all threats and criminal acts, especially those committed by enemies foreign and domestic.
We believe the important aspect of the Sheriff’s authority is that They are elected by the people. They are not appointed and do not report to any manager or higher authority. The Sheriff’s duty is to the People: to Protect and Defend.
With this in mind, we want to briefly describe a troubling aspect of our current American situation, so you can perhaps acquire a broader viewpoint about the issues now facing us.
We have put together a few articles and short videos in five categories:
• The Injection
• The Test
• Future Plans
• The Lawsuits
• Take Back the Republic
Time is short. The agenda is strong. All U.S. citizens are in danger.
Please take some time to review this information and gather with your colleagues, family and friends to resist this attack on all of us.
Those of you who are Sheriffs can engage the full force of your Oath.
Those of you who are citizens can join with the Sheriffs in your local area. Simply go to your search engine and put in: “sheriff’s office near me”.
Check out this undercover footage of a smirking FBI/CIA contractor telling all about how they like to take down anybody who questions the deep state, exactly as we have observed in the case of James Fetzer.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1777705866289914023
The Post Millennial: “Former FBI and now contracting officer for the CIA reveals how there were FBI agents in the crowd on J6 and brags about how the agency helped others sue Alex Jones for defamation.”
Alex Jones: “Breaking bombshell! FBI/CIA deep state manager confirms FBI agents were in the crowd on Jan 6th. Officer confesses to three letter government agencies targeting Alex Jones to silence him. More info set to break soon. @elonmusk please call for a congressional investigation ASAP.”
Attachment
From Gateway Pundit:
UPDATE: Alex Jones to Sue FBI and CIA After Undercover Video Reveals Feds Targeted Him and “Took His Money Away… Chop His Legs Off”
Media personality Alex Jones declared his intention to file lawsuits against the FBI and CIA during an appearance on the Benny Johnson show.
This announcement followed the release of an undercover video by Sound Investigations, which featured a CIA officer purportedly admitting to federal agencies targeting conservatives, including Jones.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on the footage in which Gavin O’Blennis, a Contracting Officer for the CIA, was caught on hidden camera by an undercover journalist claiming that the FBI could imprison anyone by setting them up, a method he referred to as a “nudge.”
O’Blennis singled out right-wing journalists, specifically Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones, as being problematic and suggested that the FBI “took [Jones’] money away” and “chopped his legs off” as a means of crippling his operations.
O’Blennis also disclosed the presence of undercover FBI agents during the events at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, suggesting a widespread federal involvement in key national events. He mentioned the use of “embellished news” and “fake social media” as tools to incite public anger and manipulate public perception.
During his interview with Benny Johnson, Alex Jones expressed his conviction that the now-public statements by O’Blennis necessitate immediate action.
“I am planning to launch a lawsuit against the CIA and the FBI,” Jones said. He contextualized the timing of the undercover video’s release as a divine intervention, coinciding with the closure of his bankruptcy proceedings and other legal matters.
The Infowars founder said that his portrayal by the media and the government was a misrepresentation aimed at demonizing him. He indicated that his planned lawsuit would not only be a personal vindication but an effort to expose the overreach of “rogue agencies” operating like a “domestic KGB.”
In discussing potential legal strategies, Jones mentioned consulting with multiple law firms, highlighting First Amendment violations as a central issue, and stressed the importance of bringing evidence to light through the discovery process in court.
He also made a public appeal to Elon Musk, whom he noted had supported various freedom-related lawsuits, to assist in bringing the truth to light.
Watch the Alex Jones interview here: https://twitter.com/i/status/1777828759829131295
Tremendous, Toni. I was going to comment on that interview yesterday, but got distracted by my spring gardening. I was hoping AJ would jump on this and he did. Also interesting that O’Blennis looks like another DEI hire (quoting Seinfeld….not that there’s anything wrong with that,,,ahem!). Praying this goes to the moon (may as well, nothing else has).
Speaking of the moon, this is quite strange:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1777724198154015105
And maybe even stranger, a picture I took on my porch of “crescents” from the 2017 eclipse here in Mc Alpin, Fl.
Attachment
I hope this suit is successful. The tactics described by O’Blennis remind me so much of the tricks used on Fetzer et al. Especially the “drive ’em to poverty” line. I hate intelligence agencies. Scatter ’em to the winds! I say.
Did you see Sheila Jackson Lee trying to put on her viewing glasses for the eclipse? Ehe wandered around and never did get them on, but looked up anyway. A lot of the crowd was doing the same: looking bare-eyed straight at the sun. Then she told the crowd that between the sun and the moon, the moon is better to live on because the “full moon is that complete rounded circle, which is made up mostly of gases” and the sun is “almost too hot.”
I guess with “elected” leaders like this, intelligence agencies have nothing to worry about.
Those circle shadows are so cool, aren’t they? I took this during the annular eclipse last year:
Attachment
Toni, Jones is on Bannon as I type. He’s ready to go. It’ll be interesting to see if Musk responds.This could be huge, so AJ had better watch his six.
So far, no one has offered an explanation re those crescents. The proof is there…what the hell caused it?
The crescent shadows appear during an eclipse because the light through the leaves of the trees creates many pin-hole camera effects that project the crescent shape created by the moon moving in front of the sun. It’s kind of a way to view the eclipse without looking directly at it. Is that what you mean?
Yep, Toni…that’s what I meant. But, what bugs me is since the sun is 93 million miles away….give or take a few million, wouldn’t the light be so diffused, as powerful as the sun may be, how would we have the intensity needed to produce that effect? I could be wrong, but I think a pinhole works by focusing the light through a small hole. With Monday’s eclipse, I did not see that same effect….but the eclipse in this area was not as complete as the one in 2017.
Here’s an explanation – from a news site for a tv station…
https://www.ksat.com/weather/2023/10/16/why-do-shadows-change-during-a-solar-eclipse/
Less sunlight, clearer projection
“On a regular sunny day, our star produces so much light it bounces and refracts off of many sources. This means that there are multiple points of light all around us other than the Sun. This is called ambient light. Ambient light causes shadows to become fuzzy.
“During the partial phases of a solar eclipse, the amount of sunlight is reduced slightly, but the amount of ambient light is reduced greatly. So, projected images of the eclipsed Sun and shadows become sharper and clearer. Notice the shadows in the picture below, during an eclipse. Not only are the projections of the Sun sharper, but the shadow of the tree trunk is clearer, too!”
Attachment
Thank you, Toni….I;ll have to let that soak in for a while. As an aside, what do you think it’s going to take to get more response and attention here?
Oh well, was not fun to start my morning with this news:
https://www.georgiarecord.com/politics/2024/04/10/mtg-votes-to-extend-fisa-surveillance-which-is-widely-used-against-patriots-she-votes-against-maga-again/
I’ll be watching Bannon hoping to hear an explanation. In the end, is she just another tribe member with a good dye job?
Speaking of the tribe…..here;s a new ADL declaration:
Apparently there’s white supremacy everywhere, according to the ADL. At this point, what isn’t white supremacy?
100% = white supremacy….so is 2 + 2 = 4. We have obviously gone stark raving mad as a society. of this I have no doubt.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1778206068159709588
Hey, Toni…..system crashed…cannot get on email….had to send for a new disk. It”ll be about a week.
Ok. Let me know. I tried the one you sent; apparently didn’t work.
Kewl, Toni….that other addie does work….the mailfence addie that I used on ej’s channel…
So I watched the video suggested by Will at https://tubitv.com/movies/100012003/jfk-x-solving-the-crime-of-the-century, called “JFK X Solving the Crime of the Century” by Jay Weidner.
Weidner suggests that JFK faked his own death using a ‘squib’ which is a film production technique using an explosion of fake blood to make wounds seem real. Weidner uses several scenes from Hollywood movies to illustrate this effect. He claims Kennedy applied a explosive squib to the side of his own face and Jackie detonated it. Then the body of murdered policeman Tibbets was hauled out of the “panic room” located in the trunk of the limo and swapped for Kennedy, who crawled into that space as they “sped away” towards Parkland Hospital.
There are a vast amount of questions brought up by Weidner’s theory, but even this brief account raises several suspicions. A squib uses gunpowder to initiate an explosion, which is why a squib is never applied on bare skin. Applying a squib to one’s face would risk burns, and concern grows when it is placed next to the eye. Besides, the actor never applies his own squib.
Weidner claims that Zapruder kept the limo centered in the film he took, but that when the film was altered, the frames showing Jackie pulling the squib string were lowered out of view to conceal her part. This seems like making the evidence fit the theory, rather than the other way around.
Weidner says that no one knew about squibs back in ’63, but I think he has since seen too many movies and now expects all violence to look like a Tarantino film.
Two other points: did the limo speed away towards the hospital? Accounts describe the limo as slowing down and almost stopping after the shots were fired. Weidner does not mention that. Also, was a truss-wearing Kennedy able to contort himself to quickly crawl into the limo trunk from the backseat while Jackie wrangled with Tibbett’s body?
Weidner says that Fetzer didn’t come up with this theory because he doesn’t even know what a squib is. I think Weidner’s theory has bigger problems than even the squib.
Attachment
Excellent analysis, Toni…really makes sense about not putting a squib next to the skin. I assume in all the movies we have seen that the actors are afforded some kind of protection under their shirts or wherever. But I would like to make one correction…no offense, I hope. Weidner does not state squibs were unavailable in ’63. He does say they have been around for at least hundreds of years and were used in Europe in plays and movies in America since the 40’s. He DOES say later on that remote controls for squibs were a more recent invention post the 60’s.
One point I found very interesting is that no one heard any gunshots considering the many spectators along the motorcade route. I do not know if that aspect has been addressed in other presentations.
“I think Weidner’s theory has bigger problems than even the squib.”….No doubt about that, Toni. ….more holes in his theory than the Bonnie and Clyde sedan.
I remember Weidner making the quote that there were only 9 people in 1963 that knew what squibs were. It surprised me that he went on to say that squibs had been around for hundreds of years, in theater etc. Are we supposed to believe that squib technology had, by the time of the Kennedy assassination, died out?
* Squibs are not used on bare skin, and if the effect needs to look like it is, the squib is applied to a prosthesis.
Toni..yes…he states that only about 8 or 9 people at the time of the shooting knew about squibs……that was a bit after saying the technology had been around for hundreds of years. THAT, in my mind, is a “tell”…it’s obviously not true. So, it’s been around hundreds of years,. but when it comes to Fetz or anyone else having any knowledge of it, very few do. I call BS.
Agreed. Weidner takes some novel aspect that he thinks he’s discovered and spins an entire fantasy out of it. He doesn’t incorporate any other evidence into it. Or even the most obvious speculations, ie RFK’s murder. Was RFK really killed, or did he join his brother on Aristotle Onassis’ island?
One thing for certain, the guy is getting a lot of attention for what sounds like a crack-pot theory.
Ps Thanks for the compliment, Will.
My pleasure, Toni….Seems they are getting what they want….a distraction from any SERIOUS investigation…as with Jim’s. EVERYTHING in this election is about distraction. Don’t look at Biden’s unending lies, the border, the injustice of J6, the fraud of the 2020 election, all the BS cases against Trump, Biden over-ruling SCOTUS re the student loans, Hunter’s perversions, the failure of DEI, EVs, Russian sanctions, a blown up pipeline, outrageous grocery prices, $10 Big Macs (not that I would let my dog eat that crap), Biden’s mental disintegration, the broke of Woke……. …on and on and on…
” EVERYTHING in this election YEAR is about distraction”
As for WW-III, we are already in it. However like so many other things, the general public isn’t aware of that fact. It’s shocking how uninformed the average undemocratic Democrat is, but tragically mainstream Republicons are just as bad. Listening to “Right Wing” talk radio can be a very painful experience. Idiocy remains supreme. Trump returning to the Whitehouse won’t change anything. The undemocratic Democrats will still be sabotaging his voters with bogus claims against him. Demented Joe has f**k*d the country up to the point of no return. Fraudulent elections have dire consequences.
Jim thinks Tulsi is the ticket, but she supported Trump’s bogus impeachment after speaking out against it the day before. She is not a woman of true personal; conviction. She’s just works the street like many of others of her gender. She would have been a better fit with RFK Jr. than Trump
I will still vote for Trump here in Colorado where it won’t make any difference. Dominion machines are used in all but 4 counties, and curiously almost the entire state turned Blue after the electronic voting machines were brought in.
GRB, I saw Tucker’s interview with Tulsi and I was impressed. Shortly thereafter, I saw a video of her taking a “present” stand when Trump’s impeachment came up in CONgress. I believe she was the only one to vote present and not for or against. BUT, in that same video she said she did agree with parts of the impeachment ….although she did not say which part. I found that disheartening. Could it be she has since looked more closely and changed her mind? I don’t know. In the Tucker interview, she said she would serve as VP if asked by Trump…kinda strange, no?
Mike Lindell has promised he and his team will visit all 3100 counties before November. Hard to believe, but knowing Lindell, not infeasible. Apparently, he has gotten promises for paper ballots and one day voting in over 200 counties in his last update.
I’ve lost the faith I originally had in RFK Jr. which I had based on the work he’s done with the Children’s network and vaccines. His VP pick, and climate change stand along with a few other issues has left me cold.
What the hell is wrong with you, Jim. You continue to put up articles (few and far between now), but cannot answer inquiries from at least two of your “formerly” favorite commenters? Yes, I know you are busy, but at least show us the respect of a reply even if it’s “go to hell”, eh? EJ Doyle had the same experience a while back and he gave up. Looks like everyone has at this juncture. Is this a pattern?
I don’t know the answers to your questions, but Jim can’t pronounce Lahaina even through I have written him numerous times that it is pronounced La-high-na. It shouldn’t be that hard for an intelligent guy. “ai” = eye or “i”. hence “hai” = Hi or high. The written Hawaii language is 100% phonetic. Jim always says “La-hay-na” or “La-hey-na” which is like fingernails on the chalkboard.
One thing Jim does get right is that he almost never calls the undemocratic Democrats a “democratic” Party like so many mainstream Republicons like Roger Stone and Jerome Corsi do constantly. They do this while bitching about Democrats engaging in election fraud. How stupid can you get?
BTW, Jerome Corsi is all in for the genocide of the Palestinians.
GRB, I have the greatest respect for what Jim has done, but for some reason he seems to have abandoned this blog.
I listened to and watched the following interview with Kim Iverson and Corsi re the JFK assassination and his new book. I heard he mentioned Fetz’s name, but i must have missed. It’s very difficult to not agree with all his conclusions re the JFK assassination. I also understand Jim did a show with him on his BitChuite channel that I have not watched.
https://rumble.com/v4nmsv0-president-john-f.-kennedy-the-final-analysis-u.s.-govt-coup-deta-take-over-.html
Correction to my 2 PM post of 4/7. Jim’s name was mentioned three times in the following video that claims JFK faked his own death. It’s an interesting theory, but I cannot buy into it at this moment.
https://tubitv.com/movies/100012003/jfk-x-solving-the-crime-of-the-century
Apologies, another clarification. I did not mean to imply Jim supported the idea that JFK faked his own death…….only to mention that Jim’s name was used in that video at least three times. In one mention, Weidner said Jim thought one part of the Zapruder film was touched up to hide the fact JFK was shot from the front to the right side of his head or face. Weidner said since the size of the film was so small, that would have been impossible at that time. Weidner believes squibs were used to fake the shot(s).
Corsi is good for the most part on JFK, but he still has the extremely bad habit of calling obviously undemocratic Democrats a democratic Party. One concept he did bring up is the idea of Baphomet Democrats which is a description that fits them quite well. People should start using that on a regular basis.
Jim clobbered Lahaina once again on his Sunday Show with Gary King. I think his continued mispronunciation of Lahaina when he has been helped many times with the proper pronunciation is an exhibit of self-centered arrogance and hubris. He really doesn’t give a damn about anyone else and only thinks of himself. It’s an in your face “Fuck You” to the public, and his followers. If not that, it’s a form of mental retardation.
GRB, I think you are mistaken about Jim, my friend. He’s always had occasional trouble with phonics. I don’t think it’s deliberate. His arguments are well-constructed, and flow right past his mispronunciations. It’s an auditory cognitive ability that sometimes trips him up, not a feature of his personality. I think he’s just very busy now, and so sometimes overlooks communications with readers.