[Editor’s note: Once again, Trump had it right. How many times has he been attacked for questioning whether Barack Obama was properly qualified to serve as President of the United States? Like the Russia Hoax (see “The Russia Hoax Comes Apart at the Seams”), Trump has been savaged for being right, when the Deep State wanted him to be wrong. Sheriff Joe did his part and verified that Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate was as fraudulent as that of Noah Pozner, the difference being that “Noah Pozner” is not even real, while Barack Obama is all too. My own research has led to discovering what appears to be his real Kenyan birth certificate, where they created a fake so they could say, “It’s been debunked!”, when anyone brought it up. The Democratic Party has become the party of lies and the lying liars who tell them, just as Al Franken spoke of politicians and other frauds. We live in a world of illusion.]
Let me show you today how Congress protected him from both sides of the aisle and guaranteed the debate would never go too far.
In 1975 a representative named Joe Bingham introduced an amendment to remove the “natural born citizen” constitutional requirement to become President.
Why is that important?
Because it was not until almost 30 years later that the issue would be addressed again. And it was not addressed only once, but multiple times. This is all part of congressional record.
Remarkably, it just so happened to coincide with the meteoric rise of a man named Barack Obama who would benefit greatly from the happenings by gaining his spot in the Oval Office.
I am about to share with you a brilliant piece of research from the Article II Political Action Committee. After reading it the foremost question on my mind is, “If the natural born citizen definition only requires one citizen parent then why did they seemingly try so hard to change the law for Barack Obama?”
There are multiple links to official congressional documents throughout, contained in the research below, so I would urge you to draw your own conclusions.
But from my point of view this research either strongly, or at least partly, validates the following conclusions:
Some members of Congress, on both sides, understood that Obama was not “natural born” and tried to pass laws to pave the way for his arrival.
In the end they used a deflection tactic to shine light on John McCain’s eligibility status, hoping that Obama’s own status would not be brought into question.
Attempts to redefine or amend Article II “natural born Citizen” Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment underH.J.R. 33: which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – “Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.”
Bingham’s first attempt failed and he resurrected H.J.R. 33: in 1977 under H.J.R. 38:, again failing to gain support from members of congress. Bingham was a Yale Law grad and member of the secret society Skull and Bones, later a lecturer at Columbia Law and thick as thieves with the United Nations via his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations.
A fake Kenyan certificate to distract from the true.
Bingham’s work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (8) attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…
1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59: in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].
2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128: – “Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term “natural born citizen,” to establish eligibility for the Office of President” – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]
4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104: – “Constitutional Amendment – “Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No co-sponsors.
5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2: to the 109th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 in H.J.R. 15: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No Co-Sponsor
7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]
8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678: on February 28, 2008 – “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term “natural born Citizen” in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.” – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)
From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (8) different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee — All of it taking placing during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election.
In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.
Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511: – declaring Sen. John McCain a “natural born citizen” eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO]
S.R.511 States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. S.R511passed by a 99-0 unanimous consent of the Senate, with only John McCain not voting. The basis was – “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens;” – a condition not met by Barack Hussein Obama II. – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT]; Sen Webb, Jim [VA]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (They had made certain that John McCain would run against Barack Obama)
However, in the McCain resolution is also this language – “Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States; – Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;”
The U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. The definition of “is” is not in the constitution either. Yet this is the text that would later be issued in Congressional Research Service talking points memos distributed to members of congress, to protect an individual that all members of congress know and understand to be an “unconstitutional” resident of the people’s White House – Barack Hussein Obama II.
This appears to be Obama’s authentic birth certificate.
Once again, as the political left was unable to alter the U.S. Constitution by way of legitimate constitutional process, they resorted to altering the constitution via precedent setting, in short, knowingly electing and getting away with seating an unconstitutional president in order to alter Article II requirements for the office via breaking those constitutional requirements.
The press would not ask any questions and the American people were already too ill-informed of their constitution to know or too distracted by daily life to care. The press would provide the cover, swearing to the lies of an unconstitutional administration put in power by criminal actors focused only on their lofty political agenda of forever altering the American form of government.
The people would be caught up in a steady diet of daily assaults on their individual freedom and liberty and overlook the most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president. [SOURCE CREDIT]
There you have it. Make of this what you will.
It raises many questions.
Would people like Claire McCaskill and Hillary Clinton really come to John McCain’s aid if they did not have an ulterior motive?
Why were people like Inhofe, Issa, and Rohrabacher either sponsoring or co-sponsoring these pieces of legislation? After all, these men were later three of Obama’s biggest critics. We heard lots of threats and promises from them that yielded no results. Could it be that these men are just more shining examples of “all bark and no bite”? (See Definition of “Smoke and Mirrors“)
If it is true that the definition of “natural born citizen” only involves having one citizen parent then why all the fuss?
Obama, questionable Hawaii birth certificate and all, met the requirement of one American citizen parent. Maybe the truth is that it takes more than that and Congress knew it.
So why was nothing ever done?
Keep searching and settle for nothing less than the truth.
Apologies for these dis-jointed replies, but I keep coming across facts that prove the US, INC. is rogue and I just cannot ignore them: (this from Jim Stone).
BLOCKBUSTER TOTALLY BURIED FOR OVER TWO YEARS:
El Chapo gave Hillary $15 million USD!
Maybe this was a huge story I missed? Can’t find an American version though . . . . . and zero comments because it was released in Mexico, IN ENGLISH.
The New York Times has separate editions for Latin America, and in their Mexican edition, they clearly printed that El Chapo sent Hillary $15 million USD, laundered through a bank account Hillary had in the Cayman Islands, and then she laundered it into the Clinton Foundation.
UPDATE: It says above the page was archived until March 9 of 2019. but if you actually click through, it only archived in January 2017, all other archive links blank page.
I went to great lengths to see if this story was a hoax, and it is not. It was captured in the Wayback machine and the original appears to be expunged. They killed the entire domain this appeared on, probably over this, now handled via re-direct If you copy the base URL without the MX on it, it takes you to the New York Times. But if you add the MX, it takes you to a generic page, that references in the whois as registered in 2018. PROBLEM: The Wayback machine has this archived Jan 2017, which means there’s no way the .mx extension could be a totally freshly registered by someone else, the NYT realy did own this when the Wayback machine captured it. Evidently the New York Times needed to bury this and to save Hillary they killed a URL extension over it. Here is the link to the Wayback machine that proves this existed. Try copying it any way you like right out of the Wayback machine to try to get it to work. It does not. WHY NOT? Did a rogue reporter post this, only to be dripping from a heavy metal head wound the next day? OOPS, forgot to clean that Wayback machine! Here is what the link the Wayback machine captured goes to now. Compare that to what the Wayback machine goes to now.
The captured report above is listed as released for “Mexico and the Americas” which means everything south of the border. This never got published in the U.S., GEE, I WONDER WHY.
Most likely, the Mex media covered this, and the NYT was therefore required to do a limited piece to appear relevant. I am surprised it is not in Spanish. They probably posted it in English to prevent the Spanish audience from really understanding what it said, ZERO COMMENTS, and then someone evidently found this a while ago, tried blowing it into the American audience, and the NYT then killed it all, while forgetting to clean the Wayback machine which absolutely WILL delete for the deep state. Damn immigrant hires screwing up and forgetting things like that!
Dear New York Times: Please hire Americans to do your dirty work, because if you are not from American culture, you won’t understand that to cover up A, you need to delete A+B.
Hire American. Because some people do not, and now we know that: The NYT owned this domain in 2017, idled it for 3 months as a blank page (probably to kill this report), sold it in May 2017 after which this continued to be “blank paged” yet still working with the page address, and was then re-registered to someone else in 2018 where the same page address kept on working, posting something else. NOT HIRING AMERICAN makes blowing the lid off cover ups EASY, especially when the now vanished report does not return a 401, the page still exists, and that’s BAD.
Willy….that link you posted [ times.com.mx etc. ]now goes to nothing but a blank pages that says ”contacto”…[etc.]
The NYT is rotten and corrupt to the bone. Even Pravda in Russia contains more honest reporting.
Willy, I have to agree with you. The US is a rogue nation. It fails to follow its own Constitution involving the HIGHEST elected office….the Presidency. This is what 3rd world nations do. The US is a rich and powerful 3rd world banana republic. This is what Thomas Jefferson warned us about in 1776…..” internal enemies”.
Women allowed to wear a hijab in Congress? OMG…what have we come to?
AND, the CONgress under the control of another rogue nation called Israel. How much proof do we need that the US, INC. is an UN-CONstitutional corporatocracy that cares nothing for We the People, existing only to favor the desires of the highest bidders.
What a shame.
Ted Cruz entered the US from Canada as a Tourist and just stayed. He’s actually an illegal alien in the US. He should be deported to his birth country….Canada….or to his father’s country Cuba.
He has never shown any State Dept. Documents that prove his mother registered him as her son and he now resides in the US.
Still ignored the undeniable source of the term “Natural Born Citizen” of which the composers and signers of our most relevant document were well familiar, which is Emmerich de Vattell’s treatise “The Law of Nations”. Any expert or Constitutional lawyer could have easily verified the fact, as I can my self only having a ‘GED’. I have long been posting as comment at every opportunity since obama’s first illegal occupancy, “only the ignorant, traitorous liars, or cowards, refer (now referred) to obama as president.
Clearly there was more intent behind this grand scam, a true agenda. Just as in last presidential election, there were at least three unqualified candidates. marco rubio, bobby jindal, and the most prominent, canadian anchor baby ted cruz, of whom it was actually insinuated an individual can actually change their birth circumstance. By denouncing his canadian citizenship (allegiance) as it was his birth place, ignoring his cuban citizenship (allegiance) through his father, and then claiming U.S. citizenship from his U.S. mother (of which it has been claimed naturalized to canada be for his birth) he claimed natural born U.S. citizenship. With total support from the media, the ignorant and again, all the fake experts.
A child is what the parents are. Circumstance of birth can not be altered by any statute. Parents of differing citizenship will bestow conflicted allegiance on their offspring, as will birth on foreign soil. The true issue with john mc cain, according to what I could learn is that he was not truely born on the navy base in panama because the base hospital did not exist as yet.
This next coming presidential election we do have all ready one candidate kamila harris who is not a natural born U.S. citizen as both her parents are immigrants who could not have had time to naturalized before her birth. I have not found the details of when or if both parents did, but still at best, she can only be considered a naturalize citizen according to her age at that time.
But I expect the matter of citizenship may never be seriously addressed again. Since to do so would cause too many facts and truths to be confronted about the fraud obama.
Oh BTW, that Birth Cert with the little foot print…its also fake. Obama’s real name has never been revealed. Obama did mention in his bio, ghost written by Ayers, that his BC was folded up in an old family book. That BC has never been seen.
Obama’s bio mother was a ”bar worker” at Lederer’s Bar, now closed. in Honolulu, Hawaii. His father was one of her customers….both were Indonesian. Obama is a Muslim Indonesian. As an infant, born at home, he was given by arraignment to Ann Dunham by her father, a constant customer of that bar.
Obama is not black or African American….he’s an Indonesian who is pretending to be black.
Ann Dunham finally tired of Barack and sent him back to her father in Hawaii to raise. He was sent to a high class school and mentored for ten years by none other than communist Frank Marshall Davis….who is mentioned 22 times in the Obama bio books as ”Frank”. The audio version does not mention ”Frank”.
It was not until AFTER the 2008 Election that people realized who ”Frank” was.
Ralph: I’ve read the 300+ pages of FMDavis FBI report and I used to own that linked video. I do not believe he’s the bio father but FMD was well known to Ann’s father S.A. Dunham…father and daughter. Dunham was a frequent customer of Lederer’s bar. That’s the bar that had the X-rated Disney art and Barack was taken there when he was 14.
The other woman in the Ann Dunham nudie photos was interviewed by a famous author. She knew Ann and her father and she spilled the beans that Obama’s bio mother was a bar worker in Hawaii. She was from Island Java, Indonesia. Obama closely resembles people from the Java tribe and many of them can pass for black.
The cover story is that BHO is half white and half black. In fact he is neither.
So the CONstitution can now be changed through precedent and not amendment? Do I surmise that correctly?
ANYONE??
And IF NOT, it would seem BHO was an illegal executive and not one damn member of CONgress has the gonads to address this travesty.
Best I can tell, there is no justice left in this US, INC. It has become a rogue nation. I dare anyone to prove differently.
Apologies for these dis-jointed replies, but I keep coming across facts that prove the US, INC. is rogue and I just cannot ignore them: (this from Jim Stone).
BLOCKBUSTER TOTALLY BURIED FOR OVER TWO YEARS:
El Chapo gave Hillary $15 million USD!
Maybe this was a huge story I missed? Can’t find an American version though . . . . . and zero comments because it was released in Mexico, IN ENGLISH.
The New York Times has separate editions for Latin America, and in their Mexican edition, they clearly printed that El Chapo sent Hillary $15 million USD, laundered through a bank account Hillary had in the Cayman Islands, and then she laundered it into the Clinton Foundation.
UPDATE: It says above the page was archived until March 9 of 2019. but if you actually click through, it only archived in January 2017, all other archive links blank page.
I went to great lengths to see if this story was a hoax, and it is not. It was captured in the Wayback machine and the original appears to be expunged. They killed the entire domain this appeared on, probably over this, now handled via re-direct If you copy the base URL without the MX on it, it takes you to the New York Times. But if you add the MX, it takes you to a generic page, that references in the whois as registered in 2018. PROBLEM: The Wayback machine has this archived Jan 2017, which means there’s no way the .mx extension could be a totally freshly registered by someone else, the NYT realy did own this when the Wayback machine captured it. Evidently the New York Times needed to bury this and to save Hillary they killed a URL extension over it. Here is the link to the Wayback machine that proves this existed. Try copying it any way you like right out of the Wayback machine to try to get it to work. It does not. WHY NOT? Did a rogue reporter post this, only to be dripping from a heavy metal head wound the next day? OOPS, forgot to clean that Wayback machine! Here is what the link the Wayback machine captured goes to now. Compare that to what the Wayback machine goes to now.
http://times.com.mx/wikileaks-mexican-drug-kingpin-el-chapo-donated-15m-to-clinton-foundation/
The captured report above is listed as released for “Mexico and the Americas” which means everything south of the border. This never got published in the U.S., GEE, I WONDER WHY.
Most likely, the Mex media covered this, and the NYT was therefore required to do a limited piece to appear relevant. I am surprised it is not in Spanish. They probably posted it in English to prevent the Spanish audience from really understanding what it said, ZERO COMMENTS, and then someone evidently found this a while ago, tried blowing it into the American audience, and the NYT then killed it all, while forgetting to clean the Wayback machine which absolutely WILL delete for the deep state. Damn immigrant hires screwing up and forgetting things like that!
Dear New York Times: Please hire Americans to do your dirty work, because if you are not from American culture, you won’t understand that to cover up A, you need to delete A+B.
Hire American. Because some people do not, and now we know that: The NYT owned this domain in 2017, idled it for 3 months as a blank page (probably to kill this report), sold it in May 2017 after which this continued to be “blank paged” yet still working with the page address, and was then re-registered to someone else in 2018 where the same page address kept on working, posting something else. NOT HIRING AMERICAN makes blowing the lid off cover ups EASY, especially when the now vanished report does not return a 401, the page still exists, and that’s BAD.
Willy….that link you posted [ times.com.mx etc. ]now goes to nothing but a blank pages that says ”contacto”…[etc.]
The NYT is rotten and corrupt to the bone. Even Pravda in Russia contains more honest reporting.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170110150708/http://times.com.mx/wikileaks-mexican-drug-kingpin-el-chapo-donated-15m-to-clinton-foundation/
Posted new link, but it’s being moderated.
Willy, I have to agree with you. The US is a rogue nation. It fails to follow its own Constitution involving the HIGHEST elected office….the Presidency. This is what 3rd world nations do. The US is a rich and powerful 3rd world banana republic. This is what Thomas Jefferson warned us about in 1776…..” internal enemies”.
Women allowed to wear a hijab in Congress? OMG…what have we come to?
AND, the CONgress under the control of another rogue nation called Israel. How much proof do we need that the US, INC. is an UN-CONstitutional corporatocracy that cares nothing for We the People, existing only to favor the desires of the highest bidders.
What a shame.
Ted Cruz entered the US from Canada as a Tourist and just stayed. He’s actually an illegal alien in the US. He should be deported to his birth country….Canada….or to his father’s country Cuba.
He has never shown any State Dept. Documents that prove his mother registered him as her son and he now resides in the US.
He’s a total fraud.
Still ignored the undeniable source of the term “Natural Born Citizen” of which the composers and signers of our most relevant document were well familiar, which is Emmerich de Vattell’s treatise “The Law of Nations”. Any expert or Constitutional lawyer could have easily verified the fact, as I can my self only having a ‘GED’. I have long been posting as comment at every opportunity since obama’s first illegal occupancy, “only the ignorant, traitorous liars, or cowards, refer (now referred) to obama as president.
Clearly there was more intent behind this grand scam, a true agenda. Just as in last presidential election, there were at least three unqualified candidates. marco rubio, bobby jindal, and the most prominent, canadian anchor baby ted cruz, of whom it was actually insinuated an individual can actually change their birth circumstance. By denouncing his canadian citizenship (allegiance) as it was his birth place, ignoring his cuban citizenship (allegiance) through his father, and then claiming U.S. citizenship from his U.S. mother (of which it has been claimed naturalized to canada be for his birth) he claimed natural born U.S. citizenship. With total support from the media, the ignorant and again, all the fake experts.
A child is what the parents are. Circumstance of birth can not be altered by any statute. Parents of differing citizenship will bestow conflicted allegiance on their offspring, as will birth on foreign soil. The true issue with john mc cain, according to what I could learn is that he was not truely born on the navy base in panama because the base hospital did not exist as yet.
This next coming presidential election we do have all ready one candidate kamila harris who is not a natural born U.S. citizen as both her parents are immigrants who could not have had time to naturalized before her birth. I have not found the details of when or if both parents did, but still at best, she can only be considered a naturalize citizen according to her age at that time.
But I expect the matter of citizenship may never be seriously addressed again. Since to do so would cause too many facts and truths to be confronted about the fraud obama.
Saint Cruzo, the RINO in CAMO senator from Texas is no natural born American….
Oh BTW, that Birth Cert with the little foot print…its also fake. Obama’s real name has never been revealed. Obama did mention in his bio, ghost written by Ayers, that his BC was folded up in an old family book. That BC has never been seen.
Obama’s bio mother was a ”bar worker” at Lederer’s Bar, now closed. in Honolulu, Hawaii. His father was one of her customers….both were Indonesian. Obama is a Muslim Indonesian. As an infant, born at home, he was given by arraignment to Ann Dunham by her father, a constant customer of that bar.
Obama is not black or African American….he’s an Indonesian who is pretending to be black.
Ann Dunham finally tired of Barack and sent him back to her father in Hawaii to raise. He was sent to a high class school and mentored for ten years by none other than communist Frank Marshall Davis….who is mentioned 22 times in the Obama bio books as ”Frank”. The audio version does not mention ”Frank”.
It was not until AFTER the 2008 Election that people realized who ”Frank” was.
Don: You might want to watch this free documentary by Joel Gilbert which provides overwhelming evidence of Obama’s provenance.
https://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/dreams_from_my_real_father
Ralph: I’ve read the 300+ pages of FMDavis FBI report and I used to own that linked video. I do not believe he’s the bio father but FMD was well known to Ann’s father S.A. Dunham…father and daughter. Dunham was a frequent customer of Lederer’s bar. That’s the bar that had the X-rated Disney art and Barack was taken there when he was 14.
The other woman in the Ann Dunham nudie photos was interviewed by a famous author. She knew Ann and her father and she spilled the beans that Obama’s bio mother was a bar worker in Hawaii. She was from Island Java, Indonesia. Obama closely resembles people from the Java tribe and many of them can pass for black.
The cover story is that BHO is half white and half black. In fact he is neither.