K.R. Claviger, Roger Stone Kangaroo Trial Set to Start on November 5th – Outcome Is Already Set

K.R. Claviger


Today, Tuesday, November 5th, will be the opening day of the trial of Roger Stone.

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who was nominated by then-President Barack Obama for her federal judgeship, will preside over the case.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson










Jackson has established a two-week window for the trial – which, as detailed below, pretty much guarantees that Stone will be convicted (and perhaps even incarcerated) by Thanksgiving.

Stone is facing a total of seven charges: Count 1: Obstruction of Proceeding; Counts 2-6: False Statements; and Count 7: Witness Tampering.

All of the charges stem from his September 26, 2017 appearance before the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) – which was investigating the alleged involvement of Russia in the U.S. 2016 presidential election.

Although he could have – and, in retrospect, probably should have – invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and simply refused to answer any questions from the HPSCI Committee, Stone did not do so.

Roger Stone

Instead, he answered all the questions that were asked of him – which is what led to the charges he is now facing.

The specifics behind the pending charges are as follows:

RE: Count 1: Obstruction of Proceeding: In conjunction with this charge, the prosecution is claiming that Stone interfered with the HPSCI hearing by testifying falsely, by failing to turn over requested documents, and by providing misleading information as to who acted as his intermediary with Julian Assange, the head of WikiLeaks, in mid-August 2016. In addition, the prosecution is also claiming that Stone attempted to have another witness, Randy Credico, provide false testimony when he later appeared before the HPSCI (Credico actually invoked his Fifth Amendment rights – and refused to answer any questions).

RE: Counts 2-6: False Statements: All five of these charges are based on what the prosecution claims were “materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statements” that Stone gave to specific questions he was asked during the hearing.

RE: Count 7: Witness Tampering: In conjunction with this charge, the prosecution is claiming that Stone “corruptly convinced” Credico not to testify before the HPSCI.

The case is being jointly prosecuted by attorneys from the Office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C.

Stone is being represented by Grant Smith and Bruce S. Rogow.


Pre-Dawn Raid Signaled How Stone Would Be Treated

Right from the outset, the federal government made it very clear that Stone was going to treated as harshly as possible.

The FBI raided Roger Stone’s home in Florida to arrest him. It is a gripping example of the overuse of police power.

That’s why instead of notifying his attorneys that Stone had been indicted and allowing him to surrender himself, the FBI conducted a military-style, pre-dawn raid on his home in Fort Lauderdale, FL on January 25th.

For those who were watching CNN at the time, they even got to see more than a dozen FBI agents and local police storm the house in “real-time” because the network had been tipped off about the raid – and had cameras set up to cover it.


Things Have Not Gone Much Better for Stone Since His Arraignment

In the intervening ten months since his arraignment, Stone has filed numerous motions regarding various aspects of his case.
Judge Jackson has ruled against him on almost every one of those.

One of the few rulings that went his way had to do with the prosecution’s plan to show a scene from the movie The Godfather – Part II during Stone’s trial.

A scene for The Godfather – Part II

The indictment against Stone charges that he pressured an associate to “do a Frank Pentangeli” in his testimony before the HPSCI. In the 1974 film, Pentangeli (played by Michael V. Gazzo) is a lieutenant in the Corleone mafia family who recants incriminating Senate testimony after the family arranges for his brother to sit in the audience for the hearing.

In denying the prosecution’s request to show the scene from the film, Jackson noted: “The government will not be permitted to introduce the clip itself in its case in chief because the prejudicial effect of the videotape, which includes a number of extraneous matters, outweighs its probative value”.

But, despite those concerns, Jackson also ruled that the prosecution will be allowed to introduce the dialog from that scene as evidence in the case against Stone.

So, even when Stone wins a rare ruling, he still loses.


Raising Money for His Defense Has Been Hard

Stone has spent much of the last ten months trying to raise money to cover his legal expenses – which are expected to be approximately $3 million (For those Frank Report readers who still don’t understand why 97% of federal defendants end up taking plea deals rather than going to trial, just contemplate the cost for a 2-week trial).

Thus far, more than 45,000 people from across the country have donated almost $2 million to Stone’s defense fund.

Roger Stone

But Stone has also noted that even some long-time friends and associates have shunned his requests for donations. “When you are in a crisis, you find out who your real friends are. You also find out who your real friends aren’t”, he said.

Throughout the time that he has been trying to raise money for his defense fund, Stone has been under a “gag order” that prevents him from publicly discussing any aspect of his case – a situation that has seriously hampered his fund-raising efforts.

He has also been under travel restrictions that have limited his ability to attend as many fundraisers as he otherwise would have done.


Some Surprise Witnesses Expected

According to the National Law Journal, one of the witnesses that the government plans to call in Stone’s trial is Steve Bannon, the former White House strategist and head of Breitbart.

Bannon will be appearing voluntarily rather than in response to a subpoena.

Steve Bannon

A person familiar with Bannon’s expected role in the trial says Bannon will likely testify that he communicated with Stone throughout the 2016 Presidential campaign – and that Stone “was portraying himself to Bannon as someone who was in touch with Assange.”

Rick Gates, who was deputy campaign manager for the Trump presidential campaign, is also expected to testify as a prosecution witness in Stone’s trial. Gates is expected to testify that Stone passed along information that supposedly came from WikiLeaks to the Trump campaign.

Rick Gates

Many see the Stone trial as part of the overall push to impeach Trump – especially with respect to matters concerning WikiLeaks.

Stone himself could provide some blockbuster testimony if he were to take the stand in his own defense.

That’s because Trump provided written answers to the following questions posed to him by Special Counsel Robert Mueller:
– Were you told of anyone associated with you or your campaign, including Roger Stone, having any discussions, directly or indirectly with WikiLeaks…regarding the content or timing of released or hacked emails?

– Did Mr. Stone ever discuss WikiLeaks with you, or, as far as you were aware, with anyone else associated with the campaign?

– Did Mr. Stone at any time inform you about contacts he had with WikiLeaks or any intermediary of WikiLeaks, or about the forthcoming release of information?

In his written responses, Trump made these two statements:
– “I do not recall being told during the campaign that Roger Stone or anyone associated with my campaign had discussions with any of the entities named in the question regarding the content or timing of the release of hacked emails”.

– “I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with [Stone], nor do I recall being aware of Mr. Stone having discussed WikiLeaks with individuals associated with my campaign”.

Trump also noted that although he had spoken with Stone “from time to time during the campaign”, he had no “recollection of the specifics of any conversations he with Stone between June 1, 2016, and Election Day”.


Can Stone Get a Fair Trial in the District of Columbia?

Given the composition of registered voters in the District of Columbia, it seems very unlikely that Stone will actually be tried by a jury of his peers.

That’s because 76% of those voters are registered as Democrats – while only 6% are registered as Republicans. Another 1% are registered with the D.C. Statehood Green Party and 1% with the Libertarian Party – and the remaining 16% are registered with other parties or no party at all.

If he is convicted on all counts, Stone could be facing a maximum sentence of 50 years. Assuming, however, that his sentences would run concurrently – and that he’ll be fairly evaluated as a first-time offender – his actual sentence will more likely be in the 4-6 years range.

Compare that, if you will, to the 21-27 months that Clare Bronfman will be facing when she’s sentenced next January.

MK10ART’s painting of Clare Bronfman

Ahh, justice in America…Whatever you can afford is what you get.

Please follow and like us:

7 thoughts on “K.R. Claviger, Roger Stone Kangaroo Trial Set to Start on November 5th – Outcome Is Already Set”

  1. Just tying in some recent items on this blog, and other information I have learned recently from other sites, to the Roger Stone case in relation to the information about LBJ being ethnically a Jew and having a long history of using his political influence to help Jews and Jewish interests. I do not know if my thinking is anywhere near on track but I just see a glimmer of hope for our republic and our president. I support Donald Trump for the simple reason that he has thus far managed to keep the USA out of another unjust war.

    I have never much liked Roger Stone and associate him with Alex Jones radio show but I think Stone’s recent conviction to be totally unfair and illegal on every level.

    I understand Roger Stone wrote a book presenting “a compelling case that Lyndon Baines Johnson had the motive, means, and opportunity to orchestrate the murder of JFK.

    Likewise, Dr. James Fetzer presents a similar compelling case for the most likely person to have orchestrated the assassination of JFK as being Lyndon Baines Johnson, Dr. Fetzer did this on his Raw Deal Revolution Radio Show of Friday, November 22, 2019 and in this video…


    Roger Stones book was a New York Times best seller.


    The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ Paperback – September 2, 2014
    by Roger Stone (Author), Mike Colapietro
    4.4 out of 5 stars 1,425 ratings

    Dr. Fetzer bases his analysis and findings on objective facts in academic style and he does mention Israel connections to the data but actually minimally.
    I did not read Mr. Stone’s book but if it was a NY Times best seller, I assume there is no direct mention or connection to Israel interests in his arguments set out in the book.

    The Deep State, which many of us are concluding is made up of the CIA in concert with AIPAC and Israeli operatives in the USA, many being dual citizens of Israel and USA and holding high-level federal government positions, appears very much to have been responsible for the conviction of Roger Stone.

    If it was “the Deep State” that was responsible for the conviction of Roger Stone, and the Deep State is made up of who many think it is and the President pardons Roger Stone, as I heard on a talk show recently, that will be a strong sign that the president is not fully playing ball with the neocons / Israeli / AIPAC influencers, “Christian Zionists” and Zionists, who appear to surround him where many of them were chosen by the president for their positions.

    1. Have they handed down Stone’s sentence as yet.? I realize he was convicted. So, it will be interesting to see Trumps reaction for damn sure…AND how soon any pardon would come.
      Another litmus test, eh?

      1. Not sure about formal sentence yet. I keep hearing fifty years.

        Yes, to me Trump’s reaction to Stone’s conviction is somewhat of a litmus test, but there are so many games going on behind the scenes now that I am not placing my reliance on what is presented to me. Guess I am just searching for hopeful signs.

  2. Every day the country slides closer to the cliff… the financial cliff, the end of freedom cliff straight down to Crazytown. I could barely get through this article. Remember the total over reaction of the Chicago police department during the Blues Brother’s pursuit? That was Hollyweird warning us of bad things to come by representing it in a hyper-dramatized way. The Blue Brothers had no weapons so why would a paramilitary army be sent to arrest them? It was so ridiculous in the movie we laughed at the absurdity. That is until the Amish were SWAT Team raided for selling pasteurized milk. Until the weed store was raided the same way. Until poor Roger Stone was raided. Until they bar-b-qued the Branch Davidians. The parallel to Roger Stone’s pre-dawn raid is unmistakeable. The ATF could have simply waited for David Koresh to drive to town alone for a hardware store run and arrested him without incident. Why didn’t they? Because they wanted an armed confrontation to justify the siege and mass murder of the entire tribe.


Leave a Reply