Biden’s First 100 Days a Radical Transformation of America

BY IVAN PENTCHOUKOV

 

President Donald Trump and conservative pundits warned for months during the 2020 campaign that behind then-candidate Joe Biden’s centrist, bipartisan façade lay a radical liberal agenda to transform the United States. Biden has proven them right in less than 100 days, earning praise from liberal observers who are drawing historical comparisons to the tenure of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

The $1.9 trillion pandemic relief bill, written along the outline of Biden’s proposal, dwarfs FDR’s New Deal in terms of total cost to the American taxpayer. Democrats rammed the measure through Congress without any Republican support, proving Biden was the partisan that critics had warned about.

The Democratic president’s proposed infrastructure measures—the American Jobs Plan and the American Families Plan—would bring the total price tag to an estimated $5.4 trillion, while ushering in a wave of welfare programs unseen since the introduction of Medicare and food stamps. The cost splits up to more than $43,000 per household and more than the combined wealth of all the billionaires in America. Democrats could enact both plans without any Republican support, by using, for the first time ever, the reconciliation process more than once in a budget year.

The fiscal scale and radical nature of the agenda, coupled with the razor-thin House and Senate majorities the Democrats are using to implement it, are exerting pressure on an American system of governance that has historically demanded a measure of bipartisanship in order to enact transformative change.

“A Senate evenly split between both parties and a bare Democratic House majority are hardly a mandate to ‘go it alone,’” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), a Trump critic and one of the few Republicans seeking a bipartisan solution on infrastructure, wrote on Twitter.

The Pandemic Stimulus

Democrats argue that pushing the pandemic stimulus through without Republican support was necessary to help Americans struggling with the economic impacts of the pandemic. They say that some provisions of the bill, including the expansion of Obamacare, were long overdue. Democrats predict that the child tax credit, which will amount to a monthly cash payment for most families beginning in July, could cut child poverty in half.

“The story of the first 100 days is about shots going into arms, checks going into pockets, and seeing hope on the horizon,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) wrote on Twitter on April 27.

While testing the system’s limits, Biden has thrown the weight of the presidency behind the radical transformation of the system itself. He backed the long-shot bid for D.C. statehood, which would hand the Democrats two seats in the Senate in the foreseeable future, expressed support for weakening or undoing the legislative filibuster, ordered a commission to study reforms to the Supreme Court around the time fellow Democrats introduced legislation to pack the bench, and said he would sign H.R. 1, a vast election reform bill that would, among other provisions, make mail voting universal in perpetuity.

“Mr. Biden knows his agenda is so radical, so extreme, that he cannot hope to pass it and keep it intact without first fundamentally changing the rules of the political game,” Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder and national coordinator of the Tea Party Patriots, wrote in a recent op-ed. “Consequently, he’s moving on all fronts to do just that.”

To the Democrats, the wave of change is just what the doctor ordered. Former President Bill Clinton called Biden’s performance so far “almost pitch-perfect” in word and deed.

“If we can produce positive results that cross those divides by lifting everybody, giving everybody a chance, then we have a chance to psychologically change,” Clinton told Deadline.

‘I Want to Change the Paradigm’

While ushering along a wave of social change via legislation, Biden has churned out a steady stream of paradigm-shifting executive orders and actions on matters ranging from critical race theory training for federal employees to rejoining the World Health Organization.

Some of the common themes among the five dozen executive actions during the president’s first 100 days in office were the reversals and revocations of Trump-era orders and the introduction of the quasi-Marxist “equity” ideology into virtually every aspect of government operations. “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government,” the title of Biden’s very first order, set the tone for the many that followed.

“I want to change the paradigm. We start to reward work, not just wealth. I want to change the paradigm,” Biden said during his first press conference.

What a president says is sometimes as consequential as what a president does. During Biden’s symbolic 100 days, this was exemplified by his comments on the trial of Derek Chauvin, the former police officer who was convicted of the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Biden spoke in favor of convicting Chauvin before the jury rendered its verdict and—after the jury decision was announced—indicted America itself as guilty of “systemic racism.”

Highs and Lows

Though his cabinet wouldn’t admit it, Biden inherited a successful vaccine development and distribution program from Trump. This meant that Biden’s campaign promise of injecting 100 million Americans with the vaccine against the CCP virus in his first 100 days was on track to being fulfilled even before he took office on Jan. 20. After eluding questions about raising the target to a more ambitious figure, Biden doubled the goal to 200 million. The administration is now on pace to triple the initial goal by April 29, his 100th day in office.

That tangible highlight is offset by the crisis on the southern border, which some experts say was triggered by Biden’s revocation of Trump-era immigration policies. Illegal aliens are crossing the border in numbers unseen in decades, forcing immigration authorities to overload shelters for housing detained minors. After weeks of avoidance, Biden finally called the situation a crisis earlier this month.

The White House has signaled that it intends to solve the crisis by investing in the countries the illegal aliens are fleeing from. Over the past two decades, the United States has spent billions in foreign aid to the nations in question.

Biden’s approval ratings have fluctuated between the high-40s and mid-50s during his first three months in office, according to Rasmussen, the only pollster conducting daily presidential approval surveys. The media may be contributing to that outcome. A recent Media Research Center study showed that evening news coverage of Biden was 59 percent positive during his first three months in office, compared to just 11 percent positive coverage during the same period in Trump’s presidency.

Follow Ivan on Twitter: @ivanpentchoukov
Follow Ivan on Parler: @IvanPentchoukov

ADDENDUM

Washington rejected Moscow’s offer of complete reset in Russia-US relations shortly after inauguration of Biden, FM Lavrov reveals

Washington rejected Moscow’s offer of complete reset in Russia-US relations shortly after inauguration of Biden, FM Lavrov reveals
The Kremlin proposed a complete reset in the strained relationship between Moscow and Washington after the inauguration of US President Joe Biden, but it was turned down by the White House, Russia’s chief diplomat said on Tuesday.

Speaking to journalist Dmitry Kiselyov, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov explained that Russia wants to get back on a sound footing in its relationship with the US.

“If it only depended on us, we would return to normal relations,” Lavrov explained, noting that the first step would be to cancel the expulsions of Russian diplomats from Washington, and US diplomats from Moscow.

ALSO ON RT.COMRussia to expel ten American diplomats & limit staff, also considering ‘painful’ measures aimed at US businesses – FM Lavrov

“We offered this to President Biden’s Administration as soon as he took all the necessary oaths and assumed power,” he continued. “I mentioned this to Secretary of State [Antony] Blinken.”

According to Lavrov, the crisis began when former President Barack Obama took measures against Russia prior to his leaving office. After the election of Donald Trump, Moscow remained patient and waited for the new administration to reverse the “excesses” of the outgoing president, but it never happened.

“I very much hope that Washington, as we do, recognizes their responsibility for stability in the world,” Lavrov continued. “There are not only problems between Russia and the US that complicate the lives of our citizens… but also disagreements that put international security at serious risk, in the broadest sense of the word.”

ALSO ON RT.COMUS imposes new sanctions against Russia, expels ten diplomats & targets national debt in move Moscow may view as major escalation

In recent weeks, relations between Moscow and Washington have become even more strained.

On April 15, Biden signed an executive order imposing further sanctions against Russia. Targeting more than 30 individuals and organizations, the measures are said to be punishment for alleged interference in the US presidential election, as well as the infamous SolarWinds cyber-espionage case, which Washington says was ordered by the Russian government. Biden also announced the expulsion of 10 people from the Russian diplomatic mission.

In response, Moscow sent 10 US diplomats back home.

Please follow and like us:

21 thoughts on “Biden’s First 100 Days a Radical Transformation of America”

  1. After millions of unsuspecting dreamers get their shots and figure they are now ironclad, how will these same people take and accept the new reality that this scam was just a glorified/magnified scam and those people are now lying in wait with sweaty foreheads waiting for overt signs of the deadly disease entity to manifest itself? Can the perps pull this thing off with nary a setback or two along the way? Or, can we expect a perfect rendition of a massive kill zone? Watching many of my friends and acquaintances accept these shots has been nervewracking for me to say the least. Now, if I have to maintain a considerable distance from them to stay free of the rubbed off disease entity, it’s going to be even more stressing. As Butch said to Sundance, “who are those guys”?

    moderated
  2. This reply is to Wil’s question: Trump very much wanted to improve US relations with Russia, but then he was hit with the Mueller investigation into the phony claims of Russian interference in the US election. Trump’s foreign policy was knee capped from the outset. It’s a long tale, but it all ended with a fraudulent election capped with the staged Color Revolution anarchy at the Federal Capitol Building resulting in the illegitimate Creepy Joe puppet dictatorship being installed.
    Now we have Vaccine passports being pushed by the Demented Dictator while at the same time the cognitively impaired man/woman invites 1000’s of likely infected individuals to cross freely over the border with no documentation whatsoever.

    moderated
    1. Thanks for that refresher…yes, that is what I thought I had recalled.

      Btw, as an aside, when there is no reply button, scroll up to the last reply button you see and that will place your reply in the right place. Unfortunately, it’s just the way this system functions.

      moderated
  3. I am putting this on the top article and posting it in full because it’s THAT important. This is DEVASTATING and we may now see how this relates to those Deagle figures.

    (and because of the length, I may have to post it in several parts)

    PLEASE READ THIS IN ITS ENTIRETY…

    STAY AWAY FROM THE VAXXED, IT IS OFFICIAL, FROM PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS

    http://82.221.129.208/pfizervax.pdf

    THE ELITE HAVE ALREADY FLOWN OFF TO THEIR HIDEOUTS, THEY HAVE RELEASED THE GENOCIDE
    READ IT AND WEEP, WE ARE EFFED. PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UNVACCINATED AND THAT THE RESULTS ARE DEVASTATING

    Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:

    1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.

    2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:

    A: miscarry,
    B: spontaneously abort,
    C. poison a baby via her breast milk
    D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.

    This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:
    8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure

    “An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

    When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”

    TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.

    THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.
    Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.

    Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.

    Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:

    Terms:

    Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
    AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
    SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
    EDP: Exposure during pregnancy

    8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
    8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
    * A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
    * A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
    * A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
    * A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
    * A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
    ____

    If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?
    ____

    That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.
    The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).

    * If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.

    * If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:

    * Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;

    * Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.

    8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:
    * A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
    * A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
    Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:
    8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.

    I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:
    An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

    When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.
    My comment: This is why we have green screen Biden. They are ALL green screen now, we just caught Biden. They are green screen and working from sets because they have opened pandora’s box and intend to hide out until everything is finished. This is why many people are claiming the white house is empty and that they are working from a set ad are not actually there. Because they are not there. If they do ever go on camera, they are not where they say they are.

    India is having their disaster happen now because they started with the vaxxes first, and have more people vaxxed than any other country.

    moderated
    1. There are millions of people who live together and one is not vaxxed , while to other is. I see this report is mostly about pregnancy. Both my sister and myself are beyond the age of procreation. Did you find anything in the report that pertains to people in the older age bracket? I download the pdf…..146 pages of detailed material….daunting.

      Also, I hope this excellent report from pfizer will seep into the MSM and soon.

      Attachment

      moderated
    2. Don….It may be you are looking at this report too subjectively. This injection…it’ s NOT a vaccine….will affect millions upon millions on this planet. They probably figure those in our age group do not have long left, anyway. I grant that this pdf has to do with a limited number of volunteers involved in various levels of what they term vaccination. Basically, they are guinea pigs. WHY they volunteered for this is beyond my understanding. It could be they were paid well. I don’t know. But from my perspective, this could easily be one of those confessions the cabal needs in their rituals to meet the sick standards they have set for these events.
      It’s also important to remember, these injections are not based on any proven science (after all, this thing , this non-existent thing has never been isolated), but on a diabolic desire to decrease the world population. So, from my perspective, this is also an attempt to not only eradicate billions of humans with an mRNA injection that will change their DNA (killing untold numbers and/or bringing them under OWNERSHIP re the patent these creatures hold), but also an attempt to keep those left alive from procreating.

      moderated
    3. Thanks for the write up on the link Will.I read it too and most of it relates to biogenetic shedding (a terminology I prefer) I listen and have followed Dr. Tenpenny for a while but these five doctors really break down what happening along with a different perspective from Drs. Andrew Kaufman and Tom Cowan.

      https://www.bitchute.com/video/i2fMnrMH3Zm3/

      moderated
      1. I would prefer “transmission” over shedding since that video makes it fairly certain all this is somehow related to 5G.

  4. Pingback: Globeinfolive
  5. The president can tax all the billionaires he wants to. Even their wealth cannot cover 5% of the proposed expenditures. So who will eventually pay for all of these new Programs….you will, the common little taxpayer.

    moderated
    1. Don, This is a debt that can NEVER BE REPAID; witness the 3 or four bankruptcies we have gone through because we could not meet the payments. I doubt we can even pay the interest.
      It was planned that way by the small hat international cabal known as bankers.
      Last I heard, every US citizen owes something in the nature of $800K.
      Paying off that kind of debt is ridiculous to contemplate.
      It was a trap from day one.
      Only GAWD knows what black hole trillions upon trillions of missing dollars have gone onto….with NONE of it going into reducing this un-payable and almost unfathomable debt.
      The US collapses and the Rothschilds and the Vatican dance in glee.

      moderated
  6. The only thing Creepy Joe has accomplished is being illegitimately placed in the position of Puppet Dictator as the result of a rigged election and subsequent Color Revolution. I can’t stand to even glance at him as I skip over his/her coverage on Youtube videos. I don’t intend to listen to him/her address Congress. His/her objective seems to be to erase every sane policy President Trump implemented, and replace it with pure lunacy. This article is not of much value as it doesn’t adequately discredit the demented fool who in all likelihood did molest Tara Reade.

    moderated
      1. Check out the ADDENDUM: Washington rejected Moscow’s offer of complete reset in Russia-US relations shortly after inauguration of Biden, FM Lavrov reveals

      2. A Russian /American alliance would be unbeatable……cannot have that in a Biden/China admin, eh?

      3. The article may be heading in the correct direction, but it’s like a solitary individual trying to push a 1957 Cadillac Eldorado up a grade from the open driver’s side door as he steers the car with one hand. Creepy Joe’s feeble minded decisions are annihilatively ruinous to the health and well being of the nation. What is worse is the fact that he is unquestionably illegitimate with minimal endorsement from the voters. I genuinely believe General McInerney when he says the true Electoral College vote was 428 to 110 in favor of President Trump.

      4. Here’s that article…..Apparently, Russia wanted to counter measures that our first gay president put in place when he was leaving office and was hoping Trump would reverse them. ..but did not. BUT, I could swear that in the start of Trump’s admin, he put out a hand to Russia, but seemed to be so rebuffed, that he withdrew the proposal or at least a possibility of a proposal. Did I dream that…anyone remember?

        https://news.tl/washington-rejected-moscow-s-offer-of-complete-reset-in-russia-us-relations-shortly-after-inaugurati-131130.html

Leave a Reply