Within a Week of the Uvalde Shooting Authorities Have Proposed Demolishing the School Which Would Destroy All Evidence (or Lack Thereof)

Edward Hendrie

[Editor’s note: As it happens, Rebecca Carnes and I had a debate yesterday (4 June 2022) about Sandy Hook, where this piece by Ed Hendrie complements our discussion perfectly. Here’s the debate (where I am going to add some photos and other videos below as well:
                                        To watch the two-hour debate, click here: The Perfect Triangle (3 June 2020)
The Newtown School District received a $50,000,000 grant for a the new Sandy Hook School (featured image above), when the average cost nation-wide for a K-4 school was $7,000,.000, which reeks of money-laundering or fraud.]

The suspicion that the May 24, 2022 Robb Elementary School, Uvalde, Texas, shooting was a hoax is supported by the fact that within a week of the alleged shooting, local and federal officials are calling for the Robbe Elementary School to be torn down.

“I don’t think anybody’s plans are but to tear that building down,” Uvalde Mayor Don McLaughlin said, according to KXAS-TV. “I would never ask, expect a child to ever have to walk in those doors ever, ever again. That building needs to be gone.”

In a message to parents on Wednesday, Uvalde CISD Superintendent Dr. Hal Harrell said students would not be returning to Robb Elementary.

One compelling reason to tear down a school building that has been the sight of a mass shooting is to destroy any evidence that would reveal that the shooting was fake. The walls and floors would contain irrefutable proof that an actual shooting either happened or did not happen. If an actual shooting did not occur, those responsible would want to ensure that they destroy the single exhibit (the school) that proves that the shooting was a hoax.

The school was abandoned by 2008, loaded with asbestos and other bio-hazards and damaged by a hurricane as well as a flood in 2007.

Indeed, that is the very thing that was done after the alleged mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT. The shooting allegedly happened on December 14, 2012 and the Sandy Hook Elementary School remained closed and under tight security until its demolition began on October 25, 2013.

The demolition of the Sandy Hook Elementary School involved strange security protocols. NPR reported:

Bricks will be pulverized, steel melted down and a new school built at the same location.

Demolition began this month [October 2013], though none of it is visible from the street. Security is tight — outside and in.

Newtown First Selectman Patricia Llodra says all workers at Sandy Hook must sign confidentiality agreements that “essentially says that those workers will take no photographs, they’ll remove no items, that they won’t be discussing the process on social media.”

Building materials will be processed on-site to ensure they don’t pop up for sale.

Those are strange security steps to take simply to demolish a building. But those extreme precautions make perfect sense if you are trying to cover up a hoax. The authorities wanted to make sure that any part of the building that might be used to prove that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax could not possibly pop up later. It seems that the authorities are taking steps to do the same thing with Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.

Brian Davidson on the Uvalde School Shooting (1 June 2022)

This pattern of destroying evidence at a crime scene has been repeated over and over again. The quick destruction by authorities of the towers at the World Trade Center after the 9/11 attacks is probably the most striking example. I explained in my book, 9/11 – Enemies Foreign and Domestic:

The remaining rubble from the WTC complex was hurriedly destroyed. The destruction of the crime scene without a proper crime survey is not an indication of incompetence but rather culpability. Identify the characters involved in the destruction of the evidence and you have identified the perpetrators. Christopher Bollyn puts the destruction of the evidence into perspective:

According to the U.S. indictment against the alleged terrorists, there were 2,976 “murder victims” on 9/11, of whom about 93 percent were murdered at the World Trade Center. This includes the 147 people said to have been on the two airliners that struck the buildings plus the 2,605 victims trapped in the towers when they were demolished. This makes the demolition of the Twin Towers the largest case of mass murder in U.S. history, but that’s not how it was handled by the authorities of the federal government or New York City. What is most appalling about the 9/11 case is how the most crucial evidence from the crime scene was confiscated and destroyed before it could be properly examined.

Oddly, on September 25, 2001, New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani banned all photography or video recording at the scene of the 9/11 attacks at the WTC complex unless authorized by the police commissioner. Signs were posted warning the public that it was a class-B misdemeanor to take photographs of the rubble. The claimed reason was that it was a crime scene. Of course, it was a crime scene, but that does not explain why the public could not take photographs. Taking a photograph in no way contaminates the crime scene. Furthermore, banning the taking of a photograph from a public place of a public place, crime scene or not, is quite simply unconstitutional and unprecedented. The order prohibiting taking photographs only makes sense as a way to conceal from the public the destruction of the crime scene. The reason Giuliani did not want the public taking photographs was that it became clear that the cleanup was revealing that directed energy was used in the WTC destruction.

The Real Deal 9/11 Special In Memoriam of Robert David Steele (2021)

Please follow and like us:

24 thoughts on “Within a Week of the Uvalde Shooting Authorities Have Proposed Demolishing the School Which Would Destroy All Evidence (or Lack Thereof)”

  1. Here’s some outrageous statistics that answer many questions if true. I have no way to verify them….just sent from a friend:

    This does not even address the Biden cabinet.

    These numbers help explain why the eight years prior to DJ Trump were disastrous for the USA. I read the last item and then looked at Trump’s Cabinet. No wonder Washington, DC is in turmoil. Trump’s picks are bosses who expect their employees to work. These are Eye Opening Numbers. This is what bothers a lot of people about Trump. He won’t accept a can’t do attitude, or inexperienced, incompetent performance. He will get results; it just might not be smooth or pretty.

    Here are some amazing stats: Make sure you read to the bottom. An eye-opener!

    1. These 10 States now have more people on welfare than they employ!

    New Mexico
    New York
    Maine, and
    South Carolina

    2. Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, childcare, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What’s the problem with that much support? Well, the average household income in America is just over $50,000, which averages out to $137.13 a day.

    To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for 40 hour week, while the average job pays $24.00 an hour.

    3. Check the last set of statistics!!

    The percentage of each past president’s cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is: A real-life business not a government job.

    Here are the percentages:

    38% T. Roosevelt
    40% Taft
    52% Wilson
    49% Harding
    48% Coolidge
    42% Hoover
    50% F. D. Roosevelt
    50% Truman
    57% Eisenhower
    30% Kennedy
    47% Johnson
    53% Nixon
    42% Ford
    32% Carter
    56% Reagan
    51% GH Bush
    39% Clinton
    55% GW Bush
    8% Obama
    90% Trump

    This helps explain the bias, if not the incompetence, of the Obama administration: ONLY 8% of them had ever worked in private business!

    That’s right! Only eight percent – the least, by far of the last 19 presidents! And these people tried to tell our corporations how to run their businesses?

    How could Obama, president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he’s never worked for one?? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And, when it’s the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They spent most of their time in academia, government, and/or non-profit jobs or as “community organizers.”
    Do not have information for the Biden administration.
    You might want to pass this on, because we’ll NEVER see these facts in the mainstream media, or from the alphabet networks

    1. Likewise, how can the finest molecular biologists in the world condemn the so-called Covid vaccines but state and local physicians, health commissioners, and others of that same ilk both condone and extol the virtues (?) of said vaccines? The Nutmeg state has exactly that situation as we speak and nobody (!) has mentioned it. It’s bizarro, to say the least. Are these accessory people plants?

      1. Dave and Bahmi…..Good stuff. I had seen that video from 153news.net. However, there was kind of a debunk in the following video. Peculiar1 is questioning the parameters of the search and at this point, I may agree simply in the name of good research and fairness.. Just for kicks, I went to ancestry.com and checked for Mackenna Elrod in Texas and even without registering for a trial and more detail, they did show a record for her.

        See what you think:



  2. This article and discussion is why Jim Fetzer and his website are so valuable. Lots of alternative media sites exist, presenting important counter narratives, but his is the only prominent one to tackle the false-flag mass-shootings head-on.

    All of these false flags and other horrible acts of fraudulent evil will only stop when political leaders step forward and express their outrage and dispute that these events happened at all. We have a substantial number of GOP politicians who refuse to accept the legitimacy of the 2020 elections, a few senators such as Rand Paul and Ron Johnson and governors like Ron DeSantis who question the official COVID narrative, and 13 senators who refused to fund the massive military aid package to Ukraine. Even Donald Trump alluded very slyly to some dissonant aspects of 911. But not one politician has questioned any of the so-called “mass shootings” in America during the past decade. One Australian former member of parliament in Australia–Pauline Hanson–dared even mildly to question many years later some aspects of the Port Arthur, Tasmania, massacre of 1996 and was forced out of public office.

    A simple remedy for all of these phony “mass shootings” is to make it illegal for any Federal agency to plan or execute such events and any person to participate in these events as a law-enforcement officer, medical professional, crisis actor or in any other role unless that event is expressly approved by the president of the United States and acknowledged as a homeland security preparedness drill.

    1. Quite a correct assessment William.
      I wonder if all of the politicians and media mavens really fear for their life. Going against the CIA means you’re a dead man.
      Look at what happened to JFK.
      The USA has been taken over by corrupt institutions. If I know of some phony school shooting and have the facts, who do I turn to? There is no one who is not corrupt. If I could look into the future, will I STILL be saying this 200 years from now?

      1. Don, you are on the ball. Rudolf Steiner predicted all individual thinking in America will face prohibition in the 21st century and that the cosmic entity of mechanical intelligence Steiner referred to as Ahriman (ancient Persian name for Zoroasterian god of darkness) will incarnate in 21st century America. Ironic Persian-American A.I. expert Cyrus Parsa never mentions any of this. Steiner pointed out Goethe mixed up Ahriman with quite another entity named Lucifer in his Mephisto character in Faust.

    2. William, I agree totally. And I wish to say this and hope that someone will reply. I have posted it earlier to no response. Exactly what is it in the NDAA of 2013 in which the “modernized” Smith Mundt Act was placed that allows the government or it’s agencies or even private firms to LEGALLY pull of these staged EVENTS? I understand that it legalizes propaganda domestically, but even that is disputed by at least one statement I found within the document. But, there is quite a gap between legalizing propaganda and condoning and supporting staged events involving an entire neighborhood or community in which killing was real or faked. I just don’t see that latitude with the actual words of the document.

      This is an analysis provided by Jim in a previous response. What is pertinent starts on page 18 of the pdf. Again, at least for me, it would be more than a stretch of the imagination to find anything here that would allow for these staged events. I really trust someone can explain it to me in detail as to what I am missing.


    3. The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 forbad the use of the same techniques of disinformation and propaganda–including paid riots and staged events within the United States that were used abroad; but Obama vitiated it by the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, just in time for Sandy Hook. He opened the flood gate and we have endured the consequences.

      1. While I agree that the modification of the Smith-Mundt Act should never have occurred, I am not sure whether that was the major catalyst for the staged mass-shootings. For one, the modification occurred in 2013, one year after Sandy Hook. And, there were still plenty of prosecutable illegalities in the Sandy Hook shooting and all those after 2013, starting with conspiracy to commit fraud by creating the so-called “victims’ funds”. Threatening children by the specter of a mass shooting–whether real or not–in their school is also a felony in most if not all states. And violations of the FOIA by any government employees are also felonies. The problem is that there are corrupt local and state police agencies willing to work with the Federal government to stage these events and no court seems to be wiling to hear evidence related to them. So, the solution in the end is a political one–assuming we ever get free national elections in America again. I am encouraged that in the Uvalde “shooting”, state and local officials are fighting one another, although I doubt that state officials will exercise their right to prosecute local officials for their role in reporting the false narrative.

      2. “While I agree that the modification of the Smith-Mundt Act should never have occurred, I am not sure whether that was the major catalyst for the staged mass-shootings.”

        Thank you, William…..that is precisely my feeling and exactly why I asked all here to read that pdf analysis of the 2013 NDAA and show where it is that these type of staged events were made legal. The best I can tell is that they were not. Something else is going on.

      3. Dear Jim,

        “Luciferian” Queen Mother of Darkness bloodline candidate, Bible translation believer and whistleblower Jessie Czebotar might tell you something about Obama from her own experience.

  3. If they were really serious they would make schools like my File photo. Looks all safe to me.

    Usually the fraudsters wait a year or so to consider a tear down. Well, its only been a week and there are determined voices for a tear down of Robb school. They have no shame. They stick it in our face and some people wonder why I think the way that I do. The USA is doomed.


    1. We’re doomed, Don, until the first politician steps forward and challenges these events and lives on (both politically and medically) afterwards.

      1. William:
        As long as the Laws of the US are violated and ignored, there is no USA. Its an idea that’s dead. The Founders said that for the US to succeed, the population must believe in a Higher Power….that’s hard to find in 2022.
        People on this blog wonder how I can live with such a negative view of the US. Its easy more or less because I have all the resources I need. One thing I don’t need is any covid 19 vaxx….or even a fake PCR test.

      2. “People on this blog wonder how I can live with such a negative view of the US”

        Don, I think it’s a good assumption that I am “people”, since I don’t believe anyone else has challenged your oft repeated negativity re the US AND it’s people. Presently, we are well on our way to what has happened in New Zealand, the UK, Australia and other countries. Since you have apparently written off this country and its people, that would seem to make you quite happy or at the least, satisfied that the country you disdain will be gone. Would that be a correct analysis?

      3. Don, thanks for that in depth and thoughtful reply. Keep up the great work. You’re an invaluable asset to this blog.

Leave a Reply