Deadly Serious DHS List: You Might be A Domestic Terrorist if . . . .

SurvivalDan.101
An 18-year veteran in law enforcement warned to beware of Homeland Security training that is being pushed to local law enforcement. “You might be a Domestic Terrorist If” you believe in civil liberties, or if you actually believe in your Constitutional rights. Sadly, this is NOT a joke.

We’ve all heard the “You might be a Redneck If” jokes, but in this series “You might be a Domestic Terrorist If” you believe in civil liberties, or if you actually believe in your Constitutional rights. Sadly, this is not a joke. You might also be a terrorist if you have ever expressed concerns about Big Brother. Are you a Christian who has ever discussed the anti-Christ, the apocalypse, or even mentioned the book of Revelation? Guess what, according to DHS then you too qualify as a potential domestic terrorist.

Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian, or a gun owner?  Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations, or the New World Order?  Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times”?

According to official U.S. government documents, If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist”

At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The official definition of terrorism is “The use, or threat, of force with the intention of achieving a political goal.” That makes it pretty clear what sort of people are covered, and for decades it worked well.  The government applied the label “terrorist” to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists.  But the Obama administration removed all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” was applied to large groups of American citizens.

An 18-year veteran in law enforcement warned to beware of Homeland Security training that is being pushed to local law enforcement. James Wesley Rawles posted on AxXiom for Liberty some very disturbing trends in law enforcement training. He reports a shift in focus in the last 18 years from the local community to a “federally dominated model of complete social control” coming out of, not surprisingly, Homeland Security. More specifically, the long-reaching DHS arms of TSA and FEMA have been pushed heavily in the last two years to local law enforcement.

Rawles notes that regardless of training session topics, the courses shift to domestic terrorist warnings in the community. That is not abnormal, but the wide scope of what our government describes as having the most potential to be domestic terrorists is highly alarming.

At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The official definition of terrorism is “The use, or threat, of force with the intention of achieving a political goal.” That makes it pretty clear what sort of people are covered, and for decades it worked well.  The government applied the label “terrorist” to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists.  But the Obama administration removed all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” was applied to large groups of American citizens.

And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that were being held at Guantanamo Bay.  So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke.  The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them.  And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.

Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.  To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link.  As you can see, this list covers most of the country…

  • “Those that talk about “individual liberties”
  • “Those that advocate for states’ rights
  • “Those that want “to make the world a better place”
  • “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
  • “Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
  • “Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
  •  “Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful, or undesirable”
  • “Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
  • “Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”10. “Anti-Gay”
  • “Anti-Immigrant”
  • “Anti-Muslim”
  • “The Patriot Movement”
  • “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
  • Members of the Family Research Council
  • Members of the American Family Association
  • Those that believe that Mexico, Canada, and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union”
  • Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
  • Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
  • Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
  • Members of the Christian Action Network
  • Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
  • Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
  • Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
  • Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
  • Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
  • The militia movement
  • The sovereign citizen movement
  • Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
  • Anyone that “complains about bias”
  • Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
  • Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
  • Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
  • Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
  • Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
  • Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
  • Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
  • Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
  • Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
  • “Militia or unorganized militia”
  • “General right-wing extremist”
  • Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
  • Those that refer to an “Army of God”
  • Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
  • Those that are “anti-global”
  • Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
  • Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
  • Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
  • Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life is under attack”
  • Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
  • Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
  • Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
  • Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
  • Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
  • Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
  • Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
  • Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
  • “Rightwing extremists”
  • “Returning veterans”
  • Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
  • Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
  • Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling
  • Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
  • “Anti-abortion activists”
  • Those that are against illegal immigration
  • Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
  • Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
  • Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
  • Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr
  • Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
  • Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
  • Evangelical Christians

The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with.  In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups.

We are moving into a very dangerous time in American history.  You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs.  Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended.

Recommended reading:
The US Patriots Tagged As “Domestic Violent Extremists” By The U.S. Intelligence Community

Also recommended:
The ‘Vaccine’ Wasn’t Made For COVID, The COVID Disease Was Created For A ‘Vaccine’—Once You Understand That, Everything Else Will Make Perfect Sense
The Rise of the American Gestapo: Has It Already Happened?

Please follow and like us:

10 thoughts on “Deadly Serious DHS List: You Might be A Domestic Terrorist if . . . .”

  1. You might be a domestic terrorist if you believe the election was stolen. Well, Mike Lindell had better get ready!

    MyPillow Sues Dominion Voting Systems for $1.6 Billion

    Let us pray this goes to discovery. It’s at the point where Dominion will have to make a hard choice…settle or HAVE THE FACTS COME OUT IN DISCOVERY….Facts that are scientifically UNDENIABLE!!

    https://tinyurl.com/f3sdhff3

    moderated
  2. Hell, you might be a ‘domestic terrorist’ if you think the REAL national debt is too high. Well, how about $123,000,000,000 which amounts to $800,000 per taxpayer. Puts that little MC or Visa debt of our in perspective, eh?
    In 2020, your government spent $10,000,000,000 to fight a non-existent virus…..and we wonder where the money went. I can tell you it DID NOT go to battle the ‘vid for damn sure.

    True National Debt Exceeds $123 Trillion, or Nearly $800,000 per Taxpayer

    https://tinyurl.com/47dh7jjh

    moderated
  3. You may be a redneck if you think mutual funds are good times had by all. The list includes almost everyone. I have only personally seen Homeland Security once about 10 years ago. They were in full on “trouble expected” gear. The bullet proof armor, helmets and visible sidearms and a label that identified them on their backs as homeland security. Was this a political rally ? NO… Was this an organized protest? NO… Were they deployed for a potential riot after a verdict in Cop kills Black Boy case? No…. It was a Pond Skimming on Skis Competition at the Vail Ski Area… about as low brow event as you can get. What the hell were they doing there? I still wonder

    moderated
    1. dK…This is not a recent incident, but it needs to be told. About ten years ago, I had to put my mother on a Greyhound bus to visit a friend in Franklin, NC. I don’t know where this occurred on her trip, but DHS boarded the bus and searched everyone’s luggage and asked for identification. No one was happy about it, but they succumbed to the intrusion. Now, that was ten years ago. Who knows what’s happening now. I DO know all these bus companies now require masks.
      As always, do not comply.
      Do not take any jab.
      Never take a test.
      Never consent to any of their shenanigans.

      moderated
  4. Rawles’ concerns are backed up by many pieces of evidence –and scary beyond the beyonds. I used to contribute to Southern Poverty Law Center when it was fighting the KKK, but then it started going after Christian groups, Truthers, Oath-Keepers, ranchers, and other patriotic American citizens and became an arm of the FBI. Federal law enforcement used to work with local law enforcement, but in recent months we have witnessed many “shows of force” in which the Fed march in with dozens of armored vehicles and SWAT teams to arrest law-abiding citizens and, in the process, destroy their homes in raids. The Branch Davidian siege of 1993 in Texas was once widely condemned, but now it is the new normal. All over the Western world, but especially in America, police forces are acting with impunity in raiding homes and breaking up rallies. The recent Federal raids on the Oath-Keepers, in particular, are extremely disturbing because this nonviolent group led by a Yale School graduate and former Army paratrooper–Stewart Rhodes–has much support within the military and are devoted to upholding Constitutional limits on martial law. The FBI in particular has been creating “false flag” terrorist operations for decades on US soil, and are now seemingly allied with ANTIFA and other groups–which supposedly do not exist according to FBI director Wray–to infiltrate peaceful political protests (e.g., January 6th) and entrap patriotic Americans into arrest. Unfortunately, there is no shortage of compromised judges who are willing to authorize warrants on the basis of hearsay or other specious evidence or may even be working with the Feds.
    It is tempting to talk of armed resistance against all of this oppression, but the elites are salivating at that thought and waiting to pounce with the full weight of the US military. What can be done is to mobilize politically to toughen the stances of governors against Fed imperiousness in states where voting is still free and relatively fair; in states where voting is no longer free and fair, citizens will continue to suffer until they end up leaving them, just as people fled Eastern Europe during the Cold War. And, we need to be in touch with all law-enforcement and military personnel we know to remind them of what is at stake and what America really stands for.

    moderated

Leave a Reply