Jim Fetzer The Cambridge University Press journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, became an instant sensation by publishing target articles on specific, well-defined subjects and inviting experts from around the world to post critical commentaries about it, which has resulted in significant advances in research. I suggest this new book about 9/11, which has 15 contributors, might serve a similar purpose and thereby similarly significantly advance 9/11 research. That provides a way to circumvent the 9/11 Truth movement, which, like the JFK research community, appears to have been massively infiltrated by the…
Tag: A&E911
Gordon Duff, Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11, the Pommer Report
Heinz Pommer with Jeff Prager to Veterans Today Introduction by Gordon Duff with Ian Greenhalgh and Jeff Smith (Nuclear weapons designer/particle physicist) The material here is overwhelming, hours of lectures and dozens of detailed slides. This is not an easy read. It is another piece of irrevocable proof regarding 9/11 and the use of nuclear weapons and, on its own, worth much more than just scanning or flipping through. Architects and engineers say planes don’t knock down skyscrapers. Nuclear physicists say only atomic bombs can turn out this kind of…
NEVER FORGET: On C-SPAN, Richard Gage leaves 9/11 Truth in a “time warp”
Jim Fetzer [Editor’s note: As we approach the 18th observance of 9/11, I am republishing several blogs that make important points every American needs to understand. This blog was originally published 28 September 2015 under the title, “On C-SPAN, Richard Gage leaves 9/11 Truth in a ‘time warp’.] Everyone who’s committed to 9/11 Truth should welcome more coverage from C-SPAN. Perhapsthe greatest coverage to reach the public in the past was also from C-SPAN, when it covered the panel discussion of the American Scholars Conference, Los Angeles, 24-25 June 2006. But…
US Attorney takes First Steps toward convening 9/11 Grand Jury
by Jim Fetzer As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, I am of course greatly pleased at the prospect that the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York should be taking initial steps to convene a 9/11 Grand Jury, as Richard Gage and A&E911 have reported. My concerns, however, arise over the prospect that this reinvestigation might be on a par with the 9/11 Commission investigation, which David Ray Griffin, THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT: OMISSIONS AND DISTORTIONS (2005), so ably exposed. I am especially concerned because Richard…