Tag: Pozner v. Fetzer

On Elizabeth Williamson’s Verbal Assault on Sandy Hook Skeptics

James Fetzerblog

Ron Avery [Editor’s note:  Among the most astute commentators on Pozner v. Fetzer, Ron Avery published a blistering critique of the WI Court of Appeals (District IV) rejection of my appeal of the Summary Judgment verdict of a Dane County Circuit Court, which was in blatant violation of the protocols and requirements thereof. Summary Judgements are only appropriate when there are no disputed facts, which was not the case here. I even introduced two reports by forensic document experts, who concluded that the death certificate over which I was being…

Fun and Games at WI Supreme Court: Aren’t we Entitled to Something Better?

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer [Editor’s note: The WI Supreme Court has reversed itself and accepted my petition for review: which is a most welcome development. Pozner now has 14 days to respond.] My appeal to the WI Supreme Court was submitted on 7 May 2021, entirely in accordance with the requirement that it be submitted within 30 days of the denial it is appealing, which was issued on 7 April 2021). To my astonishment, the WI Supreme Court rejected the application as untimely and sent the records back. (They may want to…

Ronald F. Avery: To Support The Sandy Hook Narrative, Wisconsin Court of Appeals District IV Makes Gross Errors

James Fetzerblog

Ronald F. Avery On 7 May 2021 Dr. James Fetzer filled his appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court to review the rulings of the Circuit and Appellate Courts of Wisconsin finding that Dr. Fetzer committed libel as a matter of law by publishing that a death certificate of Leonard Pozner’s son was a fake. Yet, all agree that the said death certificate was not sealed and signed by the necessary parties to complete it. I discovered this case early on and created a website to archive the most important court…

APPEAL BRIEF in the Dane County, WI, Sandy Hook Defamation Lawsuit: Pozner v. Fetzer

James Fetzerblog

[Editor’s note: This was a classic SLAPP suit masquerading as a defamation. For background, see “Why the Sandy Hook ‘Pozner v. Fetzer’ Lawsuit Matters: What’s Really at Stake” (18 January 2020). For a downloadable copy of the brief, click here. I am profoundly indebted to Richard Bolton, Attorney-at-Law, both literally and figuratively, for representing me post-verdict. Anyone who would like to support our efforts on behalf of the First Amendment is welcome to contribute to James Fetzer Legal Defense Fund, 800 Violet Lane, Oregon, WI 53575. The appeal has been…

Kevin Barrett, The Legal Lynching of a Truth-Seeker: Jim Fetzer’s Stalinist-Style Show Trial (Expanded)

James Fetzerblog

KEVIN BARRETT  [Editor’s note: This report by Kevin Barrett captures what has happened in the Sandy Hook “Pozner v. Fetzer” lawsuit more adequately than anything else published on the case–including by me. For a curious development in the discussion thread on his article–which, until the shills began posting en masse, was perhaps the most intelligent discussion (absent certain posts on this blog) I have yet to read–see the appendix I have added at the end, which represents a most curious development.]   Part 1: Tuesday at the Trial: Just the…

Paul Craig Roberts, Who Remembers the Sandy Hook School Shootings?

James Fetzerblog

Paul Craig Roberts The official explanation given of the Sandy Hook school shootings struck many people at the time as fishy.  Various aspects of the story did not seem to go together well or fit normal procedures for such a crime.  Contradictory evidence was never explained, and doubts based on evidence were ignored rather than answered.   Now a Wisconsin state judge, Frank D. Remington, has renewed doubts about the Sandy Hook event.  This was not Judge Remington’s intention.  It was the result of his summary judgment in a civil defamation lawsuit in favor of…

Jim Fetzer, The Sandy Hook “Pozner v. Fetzer” Lawsuit: Defendants’ Application for Appellate Court Review

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer My experience in Dane County Circuit Court on 17 June 2019 during which the Honorable Frank Remington presided over Defendants’ and Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment has shaken my confidence in the judicial system of Wisconsin to the core. You will see the grounds on which I am appealing this case, where the most blatant violation of my rights occurred when the Court decided that there was no dispute about the authenticity of the death certificate, when I had the reports of two forensic document examiners to the…

Jim Fetzer, Why the Sandy Hook “Pozner v. Fetzer” Lawsuit Matters

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer [Editor’s note: My dear friend, Dr. Katherine Horton, has made some of the key documents in this case available on her website. But her description of the case is flawed and I have written to ask her to correct it to read as follows: On 17th June 2019, a Dane County Judge, the Honorable Frank Remington (Branch 8 of the Court), decided that Prof. James Fetzer and Mike Palecek had defamed Leonard Pozner by claiming that the death certificate for his son, Noah Pozner, who has been alleged…

SANDY HOOK “Pozner v. Fetzer” Lawsuit: Defendant Fetzer’s Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer After filing Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on 30 April 2019, I received a letter from the Court advising me that I could not speak for my co-defendants and otherwise would be practicing law without a license and that I had to supplement my Motion with a declaration of Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact before the Court could consider it  So I filed both an Errata to change my submission to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the following Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact, which I hope will…

The Sandy Hook Lawsuit: Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Answer

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer When I published NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), with fifteen contributors (including six current or retired Ph.D. college professors), we proved the school had been closed by 2008 and there were no students there. One contributor, Paul Preston, who had run drills for school systems as an administrator in the past, was so bothered by what he observed being reported that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, all of whom told him that it had been a drill, that no children…