Jim Fetzer
Imagine my surprise when, the same day it was submiited to the Court, my initial response to the Plaintiff’s Request for DNA testing of a sample alleged to have been retained by the Connecticut Medical Lab for decedents of the staged Sandy Hook “mass murder” showed upon on the program of one Jake Morphonios of the “Blackstone Intelligence Group”–where even the name should be a red flag–attacking Sandy Hook skeptics, including both me and Wolfgang Halbig. He even shows the first page of my two-page Response to Proposal for DNA Testing as follows:
Characteristically, “Jake” only gives part of the story–the part that he takes to favor his side, using the method of selection and elimination: select the evidence that supports your position and eliminate the rest–where he cannot even bring himself to explain why I would oppose such a motion, spinning it as though I would be exposed as a fraud based upon it, when my reasons are that that it would only be appropriate were the DNA testing to be expanded to those whose images and (now ) DNA samples are being manipulated to convey a false impression:
Notice how he never explains my position, which is that “Noah Pozner” is a fiction whose images are made up out of photographs of his (purported) older step-brother, Michael Vabner, as a child. We have mountains of proof for that conclusion, including the creation of a GIF in which you can see “Noah Pozner” turn into Michael Vabner. Just as “Noah Pozner” is a fiction, I also believe that “Lenny Pozner” is a fake name for the father of Michael Vabner, who is in fact Reuben Vabner. Jake can’t explain that, because it makes the theory of false identities entirely reasonable.
Jake is correct: the first article I published about Sandy Hook advanced the conjecture that the shooting might have been a Mossad hit based upon evidence given to me by the Senior Editor at Veterans Today, Gordon Duff, including that two persons dressed as nuns appeared to be hit men, that a white van had been tracked back to a Mossad safe-house in Greenwich Village, and that he wanted me to write about it–which I did. It would not be long before more evidence became available, indicating that this had been a two-day FEMA exercise, where no one had been shot.
I would bring together thirteen (13) experts on Sandy Hook, including six (6) current or retired Ph.D. professors, and publish Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control (2015), which amazon.com would ban on 19 November 2015 after having been put on sale 19 October 2015 and selling more than 500 copies, when I released it to the public for free. Of course, Deep State ops like Jake aren’t going to admit that, either, since it’s tough to make profits off a book you have given away for free. Here’s my new motion to expand DNA testing in this case.
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY
LEONARD POZNER, CASE TYPE: DEFAMATION
Plaintiff
MOTION FOR EXPANSION
OF DNA TESTING
JAMES FETZER,
MIKE PALECEK,
and WRONGS WITHOUT WREMEDIES, LLC,
Defendants CASE NO. 2018-CV-003122
I, James Fetzer, representing myself pro se, in response to Court’s granting of Plaintiff’s Motion for Paternity Test pursuant to Wis. Stat. 885.23, move for an Order for Expanded DNA Testing as follows:
BACKGROUND
- Among the most disputed issues in this case is the identity of Plaintiff, who calls himself “Leonard Pozner”, and of his purported deceased son, known as “Noah Pozner”, which Defendant Fetzer believes to be fake names for persons known as Reuben Vabner and his biological son, Michael Vabner, allegedly born of Veronique de la Rosa.
2. Kelley Watt was the first student of the Sandy Hook Elementary School event (SHES) to notice a similarity between photographs of the party known as “Noah Pozner” and the person who has been presented as his older step-brother, Michael Vabner (See Exhibits A, B, C, and D), which, like other exhibits included here, accompanied Defendant’s Second Set of Requests for Admissions, which was previously uploaded to the eFile system on 5 February 2019. Among the blogs about her research on SHES, “Is Noah’s Older Step-Brother, Michael Vabner, Noah ‘All Grown Up’? Or is Noah simply Michael as a child?” (27 January 2016), stands out as especially interesting in this context. The comments reflect the importance of this question to SHES students:
memoryholeblog.org/2016/01/27/is-noahs-older-step-brother-michael-vabner-noah-all-grown-up
- Defendant’s Second Set of Requests for Admissions (5 February 2019), therefore, included some of the photographs that appear to support Kelley Watt’s conjecture, wherein Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Fetzer’s Second Set of Requests for Admissions (27 March 2019) admits that Exhibit A “appears to be a screen capture of a website for Michael Vabner”; that Exhibit B “appears to be an image of Michael Vabner”; that the two images on the left side of Exhibit C “appear to be reproductions of pictures of Noah Pozner” and that the two images on the right side of Exhibit C “appear to be reproductions of pictures of Michael Vabner”; and that Exhibit D “appears to be a low resolution or otherwise pixelated photograph of Noah Pozner”. And in Response to 57, Plaintiff admits that the image of a U.S. passport “appears to be a reproduction of a scanned image of one page from Noah Samuel Pozner’s U.S. Passport”.
4. Among the oddities of the press conference that was held by then-Chief Medical Examiner for the State of Connecticut, Wayne Carver II, was his announcement that the parents were not allowed to see the bodies of their children, which were instead identified on the basis of photographs, which thereby created the opportunity to create fictitious victims out of photographs of other kids when they were young. Carver’s statements can be verified from videos broadcast at the time of the press conference on 14 December 2012: www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3NS1lLo6As
- Because of its extraordinary significance as an example of faking alleged decedents by the expedient of using photos of older kids when they were younger, Defendant Fetzer asked his JFK research colleague, Larry Rivera to assist in this matter. Larry, the most competent expert of his acquaintance on photogrammetry—the application of mathematics to the study of photographs—has explained its principles in relation to his proof that Lee Harvey Oswald, the accused assassin of JFK, was in fact standing in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository as the JFK motorcade passed by. This result means that Oswald not only cannot have been the lone gunman but cannot have even been one of the shooters. See, “The Man in the Doorway Identified” (6 November 2015): www.academia.edu/24943321/The_man_in_the_doorway_identified
Defendant requested that Larry compare Exhibit B with Exhibit D—without identifying who they were or even the context in which their identity assumed importance—where Larry verified that, given the difference in age, they appear to be one-and-the-same person, as Exhibit E displays.
6. Larry Rivera also created a GIF in which one can see “Noah Pozner” turn into Michael Vabner (which Defendant Fetzer has most recently published as the featured image of “SANDY HOOK: Why are there 4 versions of Noah Pozner’s death certificate?”: org/2019/04/sandy-hook-why-are-there-4-versions-of-noah-pozners-death-certificate
7. Other documents and records also seem to have been fabricated in this case, which appears to include a passport in the name of “Noah Samuel Pozner”, included here as Exhibit F. Plaintiff has admitted that this “appears to be a reproduction of a scanned image of one page from Noah Samuel Pozner’s U.S. Passport”. A new study by Mona Alexis Pressley, “Did ‘Lenny Pozner’ fabricate a passport for ‘Noah’?”, appears to have confirmed the fabrication, which if true, would qualify as a federal crime:
jamesfetzer.org/2019/03/mona-alexis-pressley-did-lenny-pozner-fabricate-a-passport-for-noah
-
- Using these among their resources, six other SHES students collaborated to determine whether or not Kelley’s conjecture—that Michael Vabner is “Noah Pozner” all grown up or that “Noah Pozner” is Michael Vabner as a child—was indeed the case and established (on the basis of photographic comparisons) that they had the same eyes, the same eyebrows, the same nose, the same mouth, the same ears and the same skull shape, which Defendant Fetzer published in his blog, jamesfetzer.blogspot.com, which mysteriously disappeared along with other blogs, but was archived by other SHES students, included here as Exhibit G, “Sandy Hook Charade: ‘Noah Pozner’ was Michael Vabner as a Child” (17 February 2017).
- Not only has Defendant Fetzer had some of his most important blogs mysteriously disappear, but others who have interviewed Defendant Fetzer about SHES have had their blogs, videos and (even) entire websites taken down in a blatant—even brazen—effort to suppress the publication of research about SHES. Mike Adams, who has been ranked the second most influential figure on the Internet, for example, had his entire website—which archived over 1,700 videos and had 200,000+ subscribers—taken down after he had been flagged for an interview with Defendant Fetzer from 2015 about amazon.com having banned his book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control (2015). In early 2018, Mike did an interview with Defendant Fetzer, published as “The Most Dangerous Mind in America interviewed about false flags and extreme censorship” (6 May 2018):
www.naturalnews.com/2018-05-06-the-most-dangerous-mind-in-america-interviewed-about-false-flags-and-extreme-censorship.html
- Plaintiff declares that his HONR Network was founded after SHES “to end the continued harassment and intentional torment of the victim’s families, who suffered abuse and additional anguish after being targeted by online hoax and hate purveyors”—later expanded, as “additional mass-casualty events occurred”—to include “the families of other victims” who “similarly became targets, and reached out for help.” Plaintiff writes on his website that “the HONR Network mission has evolved even further . . . to provide guidance and a network of support for all affected by online harassment, hate campaigns and victimization, to provide education for professionals dealing with the effects of harassment in the workplace and on campuses, and to provide policy assistance for online platforms and legislators seeking to make the internet a safer, more inclusive place for all.” Defendant Fetzer has established that Plaintiff acquired the HONR domain name in 2005, seven years before SHES. And, during a recent interview, Plaintiff boasted that his network had been responsible for removing some 10,000 “content items” from the Internet, where a blog or a video would count as only one “content item”, as Defendant Fetzer has documented in his “Lenny Pozner’s HONR Network: There is no honor among thieves” (2 April 2019): jamesfetzer.org/2019/04/lenny-pozners-honr-network-there-is-no-honor-among-thieves
ARGUMENT
- These exhibits are presented for the sole purpose of illustrating the complexities of this case with regard to photographs and other records, such as passports, that would normally be taken for granted as authentic. In this case, there has been so much manipulation to conceal what happened at SHES—a FEMA exercise presented as mass murder to promote the Obama administration’s gun control agenda—that unusual efforts are required to sort out truth from fiction. Defendant Fetzer submits that expanded DNA testing could help to sort out what appears to be a complex scam.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
- Given the Court has approved Plaintiff’s Motion for DNA testing of samples said to be of decedent, Noah Pozner, therefore, Defendant moves that additional DNA be conducted of (a) Leonard Pozner, (b) Reuben Vabner, (c) Michael Vabner and (d) Veronique de la Rosa as critical evidence in the interest of truth, justice and the public welfare.
Defendant Fetzer moves that a sample of the DNA putatively used for the testing of “Noah Pozner” be provided to Defendant for independent testing, and that a second DNA sample be taken of Plaintiff Leonard Pozner when he is subjected to a video deposition.
Date: 20 April 2019 Signed: James Fetzer
EXHIBIT A
Page from Website of Michael Vabner
EXHIBIT B
Another Photograph of Michael Vabner
EXHIBIT C
Photos of “Noah Pozner” and of Michael Vabner
EXHIBIT D
Another Photo of “Noah Pozner”
EXHIBIT E
From “Noah Pozner” to Michael Vabner
EXHIBIT F
Scan of Passport for “Noah Samuel Pozner”
EXHIBIT G
F R I D A Y , F E B R U A R Y 1 7 , 2017
Sandy Hook Charade: “Noah Pozner” was Michael Vabner as a Child
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2017/02/sandy-hook-charade-noah-pozner-was.html
In “Is Noah’s Older Step-Brother, Michael Vabner, Noah “all grown up?” (27 January 2016), Kelley Watt was the first to suggest that the person Lenny Pozner claims to have died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012, Noah, was actually his purported older step-brother, Michael Vabner, as a child. Here are some images that Kelley has offered in support:
Here’s an interview with Kelley Watt in which we review the evidence, where her hypothesis at this point was a fascinating conjecture but where many to whom she had shown the photographs had no hesitation in affirming that, in their view, based on their experience, Michael is Noah “all grown up”!
According to Lenny Pozner, who purports to be his father, Noah was a first grade student at Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012, when he and 19 other children were massacred by Adam Lanza. Here is a passport image declaring his date of birth to have been 20 November 2006:
If Noah was born on 20 November 2006, then he would have been six years old, which would be appropriate to have been a 1st grader at Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012. We now have multiple proofs that falsify this scenario and confirm the hypothesis that Noah is Michael as a child.
PROOF 1: NOAH AND SPIDERMAN (Anonymous2)
Here we have a frame from a video of Noah talking about a scene from “Spiderman” (2002). You can watch the video by clicking Noah and Spiderman. From the vivid details of his recollection, Anonymous2 infers that Noah had just seen the movie, which would make him around 4 years old in 2002:
At the time of the event at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012, however, Noah was supposed to be 6 years old. He cannot have been 4 years old in 2002 and only 2 years older in 2012. He would have been around 14 at the time of the alleged shooting, which would better fit Michael Vabner, not Noah.
PROOF 2: IT’S NOAH BY AN EAR (Dr. Eowyn)
We have more photographs of Noah and of Michael to work with today, including the following, which invite comparisons of their ears. As has become more widely known, ears are as distinctive as fingerprints. So having the same ears would be another strong proof that they are not two different people:
Dr. Eowyn cropped photos of the two and focused on their ears. Here is her side-by-side comparison below. At first, Noah’s left ear appeared to have a smaller lobe than Michael’s left ear. But a picture of Noah’s right ear reveals a lobe like Michael’s. Her conclusion: they have the same ears!
If Noah and Michael have the same ears and ears are as distinctive as fingerprints, then we have a proof that Noah and Michael are one and the same that is as powerful as fingerprints, which of course are frequently introduced in courts of law. (See if you can tell which ears Dr. Eowyn selected for comparison. Try one of your own!)
PROOF 3: THEY HAVE THE SAME EYES (Dennis Cimino)
Dennis Cimino has done exquisite work on the alteration of the most famous photograph from the assassination of JFK–the Altgens6, as it is technically known–so I was confident that he could make valuable contributions to our analysis of the Noah/Michael mystery. He agrees with Eowyn about their ears and adds that their eyes also seem to be the same:
In “Sandy Hook: More on Noah Pozner and Michael Vabner”, Anonymous (as opposed to Anonymous2) observed that these photos looked photoshopped, which Dennis confirms with several abnormalities, including that the head is disproportionately large on the left:
Not only was this setting not a modern library, as Anonymous observed, but the neck discoloration top/mid neck to bottom neck and chest and the odd brown thing on the right (our left) side of his neck indicate that this one, like the others, has been photoshopped:
Moreover, as Dennis has remarked, why would there be any reason to alter them unless something important was at stake, such as creating a false photographic trail to convey the false impression that “Noah” was years younger than his actual age as Michael?
PROOF 4: THEY ARE THE SAME PERSON (Larry Rivera)
Larry Rivera has done brilliant research proving that the figure known as “Doorman” standing in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository was in fact Lee Oswald, as Harold Weisberg, Jim Garrison and other serious students of JFK have believed. So I was sure he could help to resolve this issue by superposition:
Larry found that these were the photos that best facilitated the superposition, where the eyes, the eyebrows and the mouth align almost perfectly. The key is fixing the inter- pupillary distance (between the pupils of their eyes) the same. I knew he could help to resolve this issue by superposition. Here is a series that demonstrates that in spite of their age difference, considering normal growth, Noah and Michael are one and the same:
This has to be one of the most powerful proofs yet that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Lenny had already been outed by having sent Kelley Watt a “death certificate” for Noah Pozner that turned out to be a fabrication. If Noah had died at Sandy Hook, Lenny would not have had to fake it. This is another example of the power of collaborative research using the internet–and further proof that Sandy Hook was an elaborate charade.
CONCLUDING REFLECTIONS
For additional substantiation, check out Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (2015). The power of the internet as an instrument for research has proven itself, where the work of Anonymous, Anonymous2, Dr. Eowyn, Dennis Cimino and Larry Rivera has demonstrated that Kelley Watt had it right: “Noah Pozner” is a fiction made from real and altered photos of his purported older half-brother, Michael Vebner, as a child.
Acts of terrorism are designed to instill fear into a population to make its members more amenable to manipulation to promote a political agenda. The Sandy Hook hoax involved the highest echelons of the US government, which must be held responsible for the evil it has perpetrated and the pain and suffering that the public has had to endure. This was an act of terrorism by the American government upon the American people.
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.
Adam Lanza was most likely photoshopped maybe from a real photo but was not that person. Remember the singer that was supposedly shot and killed around the time she was giving a concert in Orlando, FL around the same time as the Gay Nightclub shooting that it was said killed 50 people even though the evidence didn’t add up. Well, the singer’s brother came out to speak on her behalf. The singer’s brother looks like a non-photoshopped picture of Adam Lanza. Some people think this singer’s brother’s picture was the one most likely used to photoshop to look like Adam Lanza. If any one can find to report about this singer and her brother who spoke on her behalf, see what you think.
Ain’t the years gone by fast since Sandy Hoax was born? So many other things have happened since then Jim. I have a feeling this story will just jug along like the 911 attacks. Both left crystal clear to the Doubter Class of Official Lie-dom. It’s easier to say what did not happen… the official story! Than what did happen. Have you’ll looked into the Paradise Fire story? Fascinating shite. Weird and wild stuff. One of the things that got more people killed was Agenda 21 road “diets” on the main drag through town. It was once a four lane Boulevard. The idiots built concrete barriers the jut into the right lane and closed it off to actual car traffic. One lady who was lucky enough to escape drove over these barriers! Her dad fought the closing of the right lane at town councils and they were intractable. No one can comprehend the evil things that happened. The Powers that Be wanted to trap people so they were killed, the best way to prevent rebuilding homes! There’s a fellow with a youtube channel called aplanetruth that made 70 plus videos of the fire’s aftermath that was destroyed by google. Jamie Lee tried to find the 50,000 people displaced by the wildfires and can’t find hardly any. The low death toll of under 100 is a savage lie. There is a good chance many thousands of people… ten, twenty who knows maybe 30,000 were burned to dust and there were no remains to find. I urge you all to check out all the aftermath videos you can find mental boost’s youtube channel has quite a few. Wildfires that skip the forest and turn structures to dust, cars into trails and puddles of molten metal. The drone footage paints a frightening picture… a new term emerges… “SMART FIRES”. Porcelain melts at over 3,300 degrees … the highest temperature of all materials even higher than steel. When you look up the tables of burning and melting points, this fire was anything but a wildfire. House fires and forest fires never reach anywhere near 2,000 degrees f. So how did all the porcelain disappear? How do vehicle wheels and engine blocks melt down no where near a ready flame source? Meanwhile trees nearby are untouched ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9BUMCinRsE
Huh Bambi? Don’t read my comments, if you don’t like them. Write my name down, put it to memory.
To the webmaster and Dr. Fetzer….apologies for putting this comment here, but just giving it a shot since it will not post on the Weingarten article.
Toni….Thank you for that…I’ll check it out. I just found this post. The Dr. is doing his best with this system, but it just is really difficult to deal with. I have emailed him and he said he’s working on it. I’ve had countless posts disappear…no captcha…no links…no explanation…
Purposo was working with us for a bit, but he seems to have taken a hiatus.
I am always up for reconciliation hence this reply….it’s late, but I have no way of knowing it posted without going through all the articles…which I am sure you will admit is ridiculous.
This is nothing against the Dr,…he’s doing the best with what he has.
If I can get to that vid without going through some age ID thing, I’ll get back to you.
Btw, I just received two RZ CDs I had worn out…Bob Dylan…1st album and Freewheelin’. Next purchase will be his big gray book of lyrics…I have his lyrics 62-85, but that is way outdated.
Just a minor typo: “…. which amazon.com would ban on 19 November 2015 after having been put on sale 19 October 2019 and selling more than 500 copies…” The year should be 2015 not 2019
THANKS! Fixed. Good catch.
Maybe someone needs to produce 1 Adam Lanza..what happened to him? Where is this character supposed to be now??
He supposedly shot himself and is dead.
Let us remember that Adam Lanza is a fictitious person who never existed.
Fake people are the stock and trade of the Sandy Hook saga. Where there is one fake, there are probably many.
Why am I not surprised that Morephoney was recently in Israel.
You just know,when you listen to his show Jake of “BLACKSTONE” media is a kosher shill
The school was closed as evidenced by the pictures, abundant mold, no handicap parking or access. The day after the FEMA drill, Sandy Hook school has warning signs, Do not enter school – Asbestos. The Crown Hotel close to the school was booked with reporters 3 days before drill. Paid off reporters like this guy here. He’s a scumbag. This is two of many examples that the whole event is an illusion and the corruption is beyond belief.
They say Hitler banned asbestos (at least to some limit?). I don’t know about USA, but clearly they didn’t ban it when Hitler did. In Australia the government only fairly recently banned it, it was partial, then a pretty well a full ban. Since ancient times eg Phoenicia, civilizations knew it was bad, the miners died! Australia knew it was bad and still let them sell it. I heard some government ex- workers guys talk about it on our ABC. They wrote a book. They said the government got lots of tax from the sales of asbestos reinforced
cement sheeting. Then they say, oh those terrible people that made it……
Oh, it was closed huh? Explain this then: http://www.crisisactorsguild.com/2016/08/25/sandy-hook-elementary-was-open-part-eleven-180-articles-referencing-sandy-hook-school-written-between-2008-2012/
Thanks that was hilarious 😂😂😂it was written by a jerk off named SHILL MURRAY 😂😂😂😂😂
Typical response. Why don’t you address the substance of the post? Are all the news stories he posts there about SH fiction? What about all the photos from SH showing it was operational that he shows in a separate post here: http://www.crisisactorsguild.com/2016/07/29/sandy-hook-elementary-was-open-part-ten-92-more-photos-from-sandy-hook-school/
I’m waiting to hear you address this because those pictures are clearly at SH elementary in the period you claim it was closed.
With no way to prove WHEN these pictures were taken, they have no value.
BUT, there is absolute proof there was no internet service.
This was explained Willy.
http://www.crisisactorsguild.com/2016/05/12/why-the-most-compelling-evidence-in-nobody-died-at-sandy-hook-is-a-total-bust/
Every deck has a joker. Welcome aboard!
So let’s hypothesize that maybe it was open, but experienced a major flood event in 2011 or early 2012? The 7/12 email from Hochsprung to Anzellotti looks like the “moving to Chalk Hill” document to me. The subject (all spy like) is “Room Changes” but the content tells a much different story about something MUCH larger. Sounds to me like the move was all set for that year. That’s why the SHES/Chalk Hill rebate document was only found for the 2012/2013 school year. Anzellotti replies with “It is what it is it’s bad for us I wouldn’t want to be in your shoes as you’re telling them but all still have jobs I guess that’s a good thing mums the word”.
Room changes? I don’t think so. You don’t need moving vans for room changes.
This is the Hochsprung email about room changes:
imgur.com/rJsvsfU
If the email said “school changes” or something like that, then it would be suspicious. But just ‘room changes” can be just that, rearranging the classrooms.
If you want to believe that Hochsprung email is about the school moving to Chalk Hill in July 2012, then you can no longer believe the school had been closed since 2008.
Yes, let’s have another look to make sure I quoted correctly. If I “want to believe” that this signifies something more than “room changes”? That’s some weak tea, Bob. That is what any reasonable person would believe based on the conversation, and yes, I have already tested it multiple times. If one is instructed to keep something on the down low, you aren’t going to broadcast it with a subject line that spills the beans. The (missing) attachment is the linch pin, but we already know that FOIA magically doesn’t apply to the deep state gun grab known as SH.
I asked you for help before, did you not see it? Could you please point me to an original scan of either Soto’s or Rousseau’s class photos for 2012-2013? TIA.
Attachment
“Shill Murray” pretty much puts a bow on the validity of that site. Shills, trolls and dis-info agents have a certain style of writing that 99% of the time is abusive, attacking and laden with foul language….this “article” is no exception. The Newtown Bee is far from a reliable source.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AGTXch9_8I4
There’s shadow analysis for time of day more accurate than this search Pat Jack if you can find it
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=OUGG29A5XYW8
Also just watching Wayne Carver not to mention , months before dec 14 2012 his letter pleading to pass a bill that says his office doesn’t have to disclose autopsy/investigations specifically for cases involved with children homicide .
Ahhhhhh. Russ the amount of evidence of this scandal is so large .
What company cleaned up the blood from the kids Russ ?
What company ordered the Porto potties
Why were they there so fast ?
Why would a bus driver drop children at Gene Rosen’s a strangers house in the midst of a massacre shooting ?
If Gene Rosen heard Gun shots why didn’t he call the police
Why does Robbie Parker give a press conference 5 hours after his child was blown to bits … 5 hours ? Also laughing smiling and joking where is his wife ?
(Of course people deal with grief differently this is the proposed explanation , but 5 hours after your child was shot would you be on the news ? Also not solid fact evidence but if this was a murder case the behavior would be suspect )
Why was the photo of Noah Pozner used in a different shooting over seas two years later ?
Why are they 5 versions of Noah Pozners death certificate ?
Why are there two photos of a police officer leading kids out of the school upon shadow analysis taken within 5-10 minutes of each other rearranging the kids for the photo op, where the parents are just standing arms crossed with water bottles if in fact a maniac (Adam Lanza) is inside shooting
The list goes on and on and on .
If you would like links to any of these documents photos videos I would gladly share them with you !
I suspect though the goal is in actually to use ad hominem arguements with sub conscious suggestions of idiocy or lunacy .
Shills articles don’t all have solid evidences and contain paper thin explanations as well as a clear bias tone through out . The arguments aren’t intellectual or highly factual.
Their are two many high quality minds to have worked and that are working on this case and It’s a huge blessing to have people like Fetzer , Eowyn , Kelly Watt , Halbig, Tracy to risk their lives and social status .
Give some reads to their articles ! The previous questions mentioned and the multitude of other research out there Russ .
Best of luck to you on your journey
Keefer, it looks like you haven’t seen the “bus driver’s” affidavit. It is eye opening. Number one, she didn’t drop the kids off – she was driving by and saw them before Gene did. #2, Alex Wald speculated on CNN AC360 that since the number of kids (3 girls, 3 boys) didn’t jive with the number of kids who could have been there from Soto’s class, one of the kids must have been the bus driver’s child (same age, home from school that day… how convenient), however, the Redaction Index shows minor children are redacted as (01). She states she was with (04) in her vehicle – no children. Also note, this principal eyewitness to the victim children wasn’t interviewed until 1/3/13 AT A STARBUCKS? By a beat cop? #3 She states that after all the children got picked up save for one little girl, she and Gene walked said little girl over to the Firehouse. I have several interviews with Gene where he forgot that little detail. Oh the tangled web they weave…
Attachment Sandy-Hook-Bus-Driver-Statement.pdf
Also note – Gene is held up as a hero… so why is the “bus driver” in the witness protection program?
typo
your feet are NAILED to the floor
Jim good luck. I was forced to go to court for a week in a building case. The builder brought me back in after the original being the insurance company (one of seven respondents) let me out. The builder never came to the actual case. I said “can I leave because the person who is taking me to court (the builder) is not here”. The judge replied “no, your feet are mailed to the floor”. I won the actual case.
Why do we have to read your drivel? Perhaps next time you can chronicle your grade school days for us, huh?
Huh Bambi? Don’t read my comments, if you don’t like them. Write my name down, put it to memory.
Excellent suggestion.
Jim I hope you win. As a lawyer once said to \”there is no justice only law\”. l was dragged into court in a building matter (Australia). There were many dodgey things happened. There were seven respondents. The insurance company dropped out of the case and agreed to pay whatever the judge ruled, since they brought me in I was out. But the builder brought me in, then. We had had mediation first, which the builder attended. But in the actual court case, the builder did not turned up. I said to the judge \”can I leave because the builder is not here\”. The judge said \”no, your feet are mailed to the floor\”. So I went all day, every day, for a week. I won my part of the case. The case continued on and off for years, appeals etc. Because of 911 pushing my insurance from $3000 a year to $18000 a year, I had dropped my insurance, it was not mandatory. Now years later it is $4500 and I have insurance again. I represented myself. There is a book I could write about it all. That court system was later investigated, this \”funny stuff\” was common, but it was a whitewash.
The Spiderman video ruins your credibility. Your “anonymous” believes Noah just saw the movie and is describing what happened. According to “anonymous” Noah could not have seen the movie because it came out four years before he was born.
Did he or you not see the problem with that analysis?
Hey Bob, you might be the one to help me out. Can you point me to a website that has the original scan of the Soto class picture? Or Rousseau’s even, that one is also bizarrely blur filtered where I got it from the UK news website. I know there must have been a professional photog contracted to shoot class pictures for SHES, but I cannot find this info or a sharp original.
Morphonios is just another idiot——— obviously, he has trouble with elementary facts.
Nothing to see here.
Black stone fake Jake was linked at SHTreports for a while, and only a brief review exposed his Disinfo roots. DNA is promoted as absolute scientific certainty, when it is in fact easily manipulated. It is mandatory that DNA with no secure chain of custody be independently verified by court ordered testing of all nearest relatives. This double edge sword will cut the hoax poser pleading credibility. Bless you Dr Fetzer !
1. Let us remember that Adam Lanza is a fictitious person who never existed. Fake people are the stock and trade of the Sandy Hook saga. Where there is one fake, there are probably many.
2. I used to think that Jake Morphonios was the real deal. I followed him for a few weeks. Then OMG, this guy is all over the map with his weird view of the real world. No more Jake for me. I never watch him now.
I agree Don. I used like Jake’s stuff also but now think he’s a total joke. He posted a video recently about the Likes/Dislikes on his channel being manipulated because of a previous video being overwhelmingly disliked so much because the common nonsense/no sense he polluted that video with. Jake honestly failed to fool his watchers and they pounded the Dislike button because he completely earned it. End of story.
Watching his more recent videos have been highly disturbing also. I’ve only stayed subscribed so that I can monitor the inauthentic and/or deceptive content of he and his channel currently.
And now he well-earned himself being named as the defendant in a lawsuit from the owner of the YouTube channel “Montegraph”.
I hope to watch Monty smoke Jake in court as well as hope to see Monty and Fezter team-up to smoke a number of these official stories being peddled to We The Sheeple… so that hopefully America can get back on track to being free again. That would be so much better than watching CNN/FOX fake news talk about the left and the right nonsense/no sense that is doing absolutely nothing to really make America great nor free again.
The good Dr. (Fetzer) is always in my thoughts and prayers.
“Given the Court has approved Plaintiff’s Motion for DNA testing of samples said to be of decedent, ”
It is beyond any sense of justice the court would allow a DNA sample that has no chain of custody. That in itself is outrageous and indicative of what Dr, Fetzer is up against. If Noah was real and there were friends or neighbors with any sense of morality or fair play, someone would come forth with an object known to be Noah’s that could be sampled and used to compare to the sample the court has received. That would happen in the REAL WORLD…but it will not in this fictitious set-up.
This reply wouldn’t take on your original comment, so I’m trying it here.
If you haven’t found the age-restricted mosque attacker/mannequin arrest video yet, try this one, Willy.
xxxxhttps://eblnews.com/video/moment-arrest-christchurch-mosque-attacker-634198xxxx