On C-SPAN, Richard Gage leaves 9/11 Truth in a Time-Warp

by Jim Fetzer 

[Editor’s note: Lenin observed, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it”. Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, was featured on C-SPAN on 1 August 2014. He was unable to explain who was responsible and why, and his answer to how it was done was already known to be hopelessly inadequate. Perhaps that’s why he was chosen to appear.]


“9/11 was conceived as an elaborate psychological operation to instill fear into the American people in order to manipulate them into supporting the political agenda of the Bush/Cheney administration”–Jim Fetzer
Everyone who’s committed to 9/11 Truth should welcome more coverage from C-SPAN. Perhaps the greatest coverage to reach the public in the past was also from C-SPAN, when it covered the panel discussion of the American Scholars Conference, Los Angeles, 24-25 June 2006. But this one might be an exception.
We heard then about nano-thermite from Steve Jones, Co-Chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. And we heard it again from the founder of A&E911. But a major division has arisen between those who claim that nano-thermite can have blown the buildings apart and those who maintain that it isn’t even theoretically possible. Recent intel dumps confirm the use of nukes and explain those small iron spheres as a consequence of the use of special (iron jacketed) high-tech nukes.
So what’s with Richard Gage and A&E911 that they are still promoting a theory that T. Mark Hightower and I proved was indefensible in three articles published on 1 May 2011, on 17 July 2011 and on 27 August 2011lEditor’s note: And, more recently, T. Mark Hightower, “9/11 Twin Towers Collapse and Vaporization cannot be explained by nanothermite alone”.l Why did Gage squander this precious opportunity to advance 9/11 Truth on C-SPAN by endorsing a provably false theory?
Richard Gage on C-SPAN 1 August 2014): To watch, click here.

The “big three” questions

Not only that, but there are three major questions in the public mind about 9/11, which are these:
(a) what happened on 9/11? 
(b) how was it done?
(c) who was responsible and why?
We know the before and after of the World Trade Center in relation to 9/11, so the answer to (a) is trivial. But Richard Gage had no answer to (c), even though he was asked it several times, and his answer to (b) was false and misleading. Is this the best that Richard Gage and A&E911 can do? It was embarrassing when he was asked the all too obvious question and could not answer it. [Editor’s note: In retrospect, that may have been the point and why he rather than, say, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, was featured on C-SPAN.]
A&E911 is not alone in attempting to place the how ahead of the who and the why, where Judy Wood and her DEW supporters adopt the very same stance. But the American public has limited patience with those who can’t produce answers to such obvious questions, especially more than a decade after the event. And that is why “Operation Terror”, Art Olivier’s reconstruction of the events of 9/11, is a more powerful instrument for opening the mind to what may have happened than the appeal to an obscure causal mechanism–especially when it is misconceived.
All three questions have justifiable answers, but Richard Gage did not deliver them. It was much worse than that, because the host had prepared to defeat any appeal he would make to “thermite”, using NIST as his authority and thereby begging the question, by assuming the position of NIST that is the position in doubt:
Most Americans are too gullible to realize that this is citing the very source that Gage is disputing. But it could have been worse. He could have pointed out that Niels Harrit, a proponent of the nano-thermite hypothesis, has estimated that it would have required “hundreds of tons” to do the job (where Harrit has also offered the more precise calculation of from 29,000 metric tons to 143,000 metric tons for each tower) or that the lab Christopher Bollyn has cited Los Alamos as his source for “explosive nano-thermite” told Gordon Duff “they couldn’t produce anything smaller than 10 microns and it couldn’t blow a hole in a piece of paper”.

Why nano-thermite can’t cut it

If this had been an episode of “The Twilight Zone”, it might have made more sense where 9/11 Truth is caught in a time warp. Richard Gage must know by now that nano-thermite cannot live up to its capabilities as advanced by Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and others, who regard themselves as the custodians and only true practitioners of the scientific method in 9/11 research. Nano-thermite (or even “thermite”, which is the term Gage used) has only 1/13 the explosive force of TNT and, whatever contribution it may have made to the collapse of Building 7, cannot possibly have been responsible for blowing apart the Twin Towers.
As Denis Spitzer et al., “Energetic nano-materials: Opportunities for enhanced performances”, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids (2010), observes, given the crucial role of the rapid expansion of gases to perform work by explosives, states, “Gas generating nano-thermites: Thermites are energetic materials, which do not release gaseous species when they decompose. However, explosives can be blended in thermites to give them blasting properties”, which implies that, unless supplemented with explosives, nano-thermites are non-explosive. So Mark and I may have been overly generous.
Having published three articles explaining that nano-thermite cannot have done it and to inform prominent researchers about this discovery, Mark wrote to Steven Jones, Richard Gage, and others. Dwain Deets, the former Chief of Research Engineering and Director for Aeronautical Projects at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, wrote to Mark and told him that he had listened to our interview on “The Real Deal” and said: “Excellent interview. A step toward trimming back claims that overshoot the evidence.”
Dwain also sent a diagram illustrating certain detonation velocities as well as the sonic (speed of sound) velocities in various materials. Thus, for a high explosive to significantly fragment a material, its detonation velocity must be equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material. This law requires a detonation velocity of at least 3,200 m/s to fragment concrete and 6,100 m/s to fragment steel, which is far beyond the highest recorded detonation velocity of 895 m/s for nano-thermite.

“Explosive Evidence”

It came as no surprise when Richard Gage recommended “Explosive Evidence”, the A&E911 documentary about what happened to the World Trade Center, especially to WTC-7. Since it was published on 12 September 2012, while Mark and I published our studies in May-August 2011, A&E911 must have known that the theory they were presenting had already been shown to be indefensible on scientific grounds. While nano-thermite proponents claim to be “scientific”, they violate the canons of science by not revising their views when new evidence or new hypotheses become available.
Indeed, during The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference, which was held in Urbana, IL, on 22 September 2013, we presented “Explosive Evidence” as the first hour of the conference, where I advanced a critique of its limitations and shortcomings during the second hour as follows and explained why the currently available evidence now supports the conclusion that the Twin Towers were taken out using a sophisticated arrangement of micro or mini nukes, which appear to have been attached to the core columns of each:
Indeed, ample substantiation had already been presented during The Vancouver Hearings, which were held there 15-17 June 2012, including several presentations that supported the use of nukes on 9/11, the most significant of which was made by Jeff Prager (where Don Fox presented on his behalf). Jeff explained that, in 2002, he set out to prove that, on 9/11, 19 Muslims had hijacked four planes and attacked us. But by 2005, he realized this was false, sold his business, left the US and began to investigate 9/11 full-time. (See his 9/11 America Nuked.)

How it was done

In “Proof of Ternary Fission in New York City on 9/11″ he observes (1) that dust samples are the best evidence of what happened on 9/11; (2) that the USGS samples taken over a dozen locations show how various elements interacted prove that fission reaction(s) had taken place; (3) that Multiple Myeloma in the general population at a rate of 3-9 incidents per 100,000 people, but the rate was 18 per 100,000 among first responders; (4) that other cancers relatively unusual cancers have appeared among the responders, including non-Hodgkins lymphoma, leukemia, thyroid, pancreatic, brain, prostate, esophageal and blood and plasma cancers; and (5) that, as of March 2011, no less than 1,003 first responders died from various cancers. The elements found in the USGS dust samples provide a rather astonishing array of proof of nukes:
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
New research on the use of nukes has provided further confirmation, including studies by Don Fox, Dr. Ed Ward and Jeff Prager, show these elements occur in patterns of correlation that make the hypothesis virtually undeniable (not that Steve Jones, Kevin Ryan and Richard Gage, among others, will not continue to deny it), where Gordon Duff has recently published that the actual number of New Yorkers who have incurred these unusual 9/11-related cancers has now increased to more than 70,000.
And this is not a new issue. In his analysis of “The Pros and Cons of the Toronto Hearings”, for example, which was published 20 September 2011, Joshua Blakeney observed that Judge Richard Lee was concerned about Kevin Ryan’s appeals to nano-thermite and asked whether it had ever been used to demolish a building. If there was even “an embarrassing moment” in the history of the 9/11 Truth movement, this must have been it. So why was Richard Gage repeating the blunder on C-SPAN? Wasn’t once bad enough?
It is ironic that the nano-thermite theory, which was based on dust samples, has been superseded by new research based on more comprehensive dust samples, but that is characteristic of scientific research: the discovery of new data or of new alternatives can lead to the rejection of hypotheses previously accepted, to the acceptance of hypotheses previously rejected and to leaving others in suspense, which is characteristic not only of science specifically but of rationality of belief in general.

 What about Planes/No Planes?

If the impossibility of nano-thermite having blown apart the Twin Towers drives Richard Gage, Steve Jones and Niels Harrit up the wall, questions that have arisen about the 9/11 crash sites and evidence suggests that all four of them were fabricated or faked (albeit in different ways). It was profoundly disturbing, therefore, when Richard Gage implied the 9/11 plane crashes were real, which contradicts the available evidence. But we have documentary proof that Flights 11 (North Tower) and 77 (Pentagon) were not even scheduled that day, where FAA registration records show that the planes used for Flights 93 (Shanksville) and 175 (South Tower) were not taken out of service (“deregistered”) until 28 September 2005. So how could planes that were not even in the air have crashed on 9/11? and how could planes that crashed on 9/11 have still been in the air four years later?
For many students of 9/11, their brains shut off at the very idea, even though Pilots for 9/11 Truth have established that Flight 93 was in the air that day, but that it was over Champaign-Urbana, IL, after it had allegedly crashed in Shanksville; and that Flight 175 was also in the air that day, but that it was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, PA, long after it had purportedly hit the South Tower. This means that the videos we have seen of the planes hitting the North and the South Towers involved some form of fakery, as I have repeatedly explained.
It won’t do to suggest that real planes of any kind–such as drones or special military aircraft–were used for that purpose, since their entry involved no loss in velocity in violation of Newton’s third law. And, as Jack White, a legendary student of JFK, who turned his attention to 9/11, discovered, the engine component found at Church & Murray was under a steel scaffolding, sitting on a relatively undamaged sidewalk, and was the wrong make to have come from a Boeing 767. He also found FOX NEWS footage of men in FBI vests unloading something heavy from a white van, which would have come as sensational news, had Richard Gage made observations of this kind on C-SPAN:
That no plane crashed in Shanksville should be apparent to anyone who has seen what a real plane crash looks like, such as the downing of the “Malaysian 17” in Ukraine. While that case is fascinating in its own right, the proof that we were mislead about the Pentagon extends from violation of laws of aerodynamics and physics entailed by the official flight trajectory to the more obvious consideration that the plane shown in the one frame that the Pentagon claims to show “the plane”, when compared to the image of a Boeing 757 (properly sized for comparison) was far too small to have been a Boeing 757:
Issues about the planes would be overwhelmingly more interesting to the public than talking about red-and-grey chips found in the dust, especially when–even if they were bona fide nano-thermite–cannot possibly explain how the Twin Towers were destroyed. That none of the 9/11 aircraft actually crashed and none of the passengers aboard them died is an entirely different matter, because it proves the entire “War on Terror” was a fabrication. Too many in the movement seem to forget that a half-dozen or more of the “suicide hijackers” turned up alive and well the following day. Gage not only made none of the obvious points made here but implied that the 9/11 aircraft were real. Either way, issues are raised about his competence or his integrity.

Who was responsible and why?

More disturbing than his failure to discuss the planes that did not crash–and to imply that they were real–was his utter incapacity to answer simple, direct questions about who and why. 9/11 dates from the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990-91, which left the military-industrial complex without a boogie man to pacify the American public with regard to the “peace dividend” it would never see and a new threat to keep the taxpayer’s billions coming into their coffers. It involved collusion between the CIA, the Neo-Cons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad, where Israel would come out of 9/11 as “the big winner”.
During The Vancouver Hearings, Susan Lindauer revealed inside information that 9/11 was an “inside job.” She served as the liaison between the CIA and Saddam Hussein, who was so eager to avoid war with the U.S. that he offered to purchase 1,000,000 cars per year for the next ten years. If that was not enough, he said, make it the next twenty!  Imagine where the U.S. would be economically if we had only taken up his proposal? Instead, when Susan learned of plans to attack Iraq, she protested vigorously to President Bush. For taking that step, for speaking out about her concerns over the injustice of it all, she was harassed, intimidated, imprisoned and tortured.
9/11 was conceived as an elaborate psychological operation to instill fear into the American people in order to manipulate them into supporting the political agenda of the Bush/Cheney administration, which included the invasion of several nations in the Middle East to bring about the creation of a new century of American domination of the world for the next 100 years. The evidence supports the inference that 9/11 was a “national security event” which was authorized at the highest levels of the American government–the CIA, the NSA, the Pentagon and The White House. It facilitated a reversal of US foreign policy and extraordinary constraints on the Constitution of the United States, which have dramatically increased the centralization of political power in the executive branch and dominating the legislative and judicial branches of government.
The creation of the Department of Homeland Security has been especially ominous, where DHS has now requisitioned more than 2 billion rounds of .40 caliber hollow point ammo, which is not even permissible in the conduct of warfare under The Geneva Conventions. Combined with more than 300 FEMA camps around the country, every American should be alarmed at the parallels with the rise of The Third Reich in Germany before WWII. As a former Marine Corps officer, I am extremely apprehensive over the future of my country, which has been transformed from the most admired and respected nation in the world–along with our “gallant ally”‘ in the Middle East, Israel–to being the most despised and reviled. By 2014, Richard Gage should have known these things, which makes his silence about them all the more telling.
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth and the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. NOTE: This article originally appeared in Veterans Today in 2014 and was republished on an earlier blog of mine in 2015. It appears here on the 19th observance of the atrocities committed by Israel upon the United States–with a little help from its friends. For more, see
Please follow and like us:

58 thoughts on “On C-SPAN, Richard Gage leaves 9/11 Truth in a Time-Warp”

  1. Pingback: URL
  2. I am an architect in the “state of Texas” and I have been interested in how the Twin Towers fell since the afternoon of 9/11/01. I watched the live and recorded videos of the crashes and collapses and I watched the video simulations of how the Twin Towers fell. Even as an architect I believed what I was told about how they fell.

    Five years earlier I had built an Early American Tavern called the Silver Eagle Taphouse where I had hosted many speakers at the Taphouse who were concerned about the direction of our nation in many areas. I had a brochure from a police group that said the police state would arrive in the year 2000. So I was watching for it and when 9/11 happened I knew it had arrive, just a little late. I knew that something was politically wrong with 9/11 but I did not doubt the way I was told the towers fell. I had no information to dispute the official claims.

    So then came Eric Hufschmid in 2002 with his book and 2 hour video “Painful Questions” on the Twin Towers and for the first time Building 7 falling that same day. Seeing that video was a confidence builder. I knew that was the result of controlled demolition and if that was prewired so were the rest. That was 90% of the step. He also covered the Pentagon and Shanksville. He showed that the Twin Towers had a very large heavy core not a “hollow Tube” as we were told and shown by the media and officials. I showed the video at the Taphouse to at least 300 people over several weeks.

    Then came my good friend Dave VonKleist who had already been to my Taphouse twice before on the Gulf War syndrome and my Michael New military court fund raiser. He made a great video called “9/11 In Plane Site” That’s where I learned about another alternative to hijacked airliners crashing into the Twin Towers and more detail about Shanksville and a lot more about the Pentagon. It was a powerful and well done video which was well received by all and shown many times to crowds at the Taphouse. Dave’s narration on Conspiracy theories and his sound track was captivating!

    Then came “Loose Change” wow, I didn’t think they could get much better! Dylan Avery and Luke Rudkowski did a great job on Loose Change showing the level of intrigue that was going on with manipulation of all kinds of aircraft on 9/11/01 with an equally great sound track. This too was a very powerful video that was also well received and shown many times at the Taphouse. These three videos turned a lot of folks away from government/media lies.

    Then came my friend, Richard Gage with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I had to join that straight way almost as soon as it was formed. I was told by some at their office I was the 23rd member. I think that has been disputed now but I was still real early to “join.” I hosted Richard at least twice in Austin and he has stayed in my home and he made live presentations at the Taphouse. I joined him at the University of Texas for a major presentation and took my scale model of the World Trade Center at 1″=40′. I helped him answer questions at the end of the presentation on stage. It was Richard Gage and his work at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth that brought a lot of legitimacy to the conspiracy potential of 9/11 and people took him more seriously than some of the others because he was an architect and represented a lot of architects and that expanded into other professions, construction, demolition, engineers, and physicists etc. Richard got involved with BYU Physicist professor, Steven Jones, and they both worked together presenting evidence of what Jones and others had found in the dust samples which is more compelling evidence that something went on at the WTC besides jet crashes. And at the time that was ground breaking! And I believed it. And so far I have been accepting most of the ideas I have been hearing about since the beginning and left the government story about 9/11 eons behind. The Super Nanothermite still sounds good even now at least compared to what I knew before that. And there is some visual evidence of melted iron pouring out of the South Tower.

    Then came my friend Christopher Bollyn (who also worked personally with Dr. Steven Jones) and stayed in my home on two occasions once for about two weeks where we worked on power points together. My whole family loves Christopher even my dog and cats. Christopher made presentations at Brave New Books and at the Truth Seekers in Austin while staying with me. On his visit and stay I hosted the Austin Truth Fest at Scholz Biergarten with Christopher Bollyn, Texe Marrs, and John Stadtmiller and live streamed that. And once again I live streamed “The Ship That Won’t Sink” with Christopher Bollyn and several others. I really learned the most about the controlling individuals at all levels of the 9/11 event from Christopher. He has done the research himself personally as a really good investigative journalist and scholar of Middle Eastern politics.

    So what I’m saying is that by myself I have discovered very little if anything about 9/11 and what happened, how it happened and who did it. And these things change the more we learn and I don’t hold anyone in any less esteem because of the emergence of some new information or discovery of new technology that was used in secrecy and kept from us. Super Nanothermite is also a new product and is supposed to be very powerful but I have no way of proving any of that myself. Also this nuclear application from the basements is also a new means and manner of using technology I find very interesting but I have no real expertise in that area either. But both take secured access to the building to execute meaning no airline hijackers did that. This is not to say I fall for all evidence presented on any conspiracy including 9/11. I have seen lots of things I have rejected but will not bring them up here.

    The other main thing I’m saying is the precise means of destroying property on 9/11 matters little compared to the question of who did it. And it is clear we were lied to about who did it and therefore the naturally resulting wrath and precautions were not directed at the correct parties. And nothing should have been directed at the American people. So the real question is how do we stop these events, not how they were done. We are governed today by an Eventocracy where the super wealthy buy events that alter our law and life. I have a solution and it’s been around for centuries and its built into our law already. See it at our Question Everything 2020 Conference in Austin November 7 and 8 2020 at https://MixNstream.com

  3. Dear Dr. Fetzer,
    Thank you for this update. Of all the 9/11 researchers, you are the closest to the truth in my opinion, but I have to say that the destruction of the WTC was most likely a low-energy nuclear reaction because there were only traces of radioactive elements. This version of events is consistent with but does not necessarily support directed energy weapons. Alternatively, some classified type of nukes was employed that does not generate a lot of radioactivity. Or a combination of methods, such as unconventional nukes, DEWs, traditional explosives, etc, except for thermite. Traditional nukes based on plutonium, uranium, or hydrogen are extremely dirty in terms of radioactivity, and they generate a lot of heat and light. Blowing up the WTC with traditional nukes (be that micro or mini-nukes) would have created a huge radioactive mess, which is not what happened. Regarding the debate between holograms vs. fake videos of 9/11 planes, I believe that both technologies were fairly advanced in 2001, and both were used for sure. Richard D Hall is a great researcher, but he is flat wrong on this issue, and it does not add to his credibility that he labels anyone who advocates faking of plane videos as disinfo agents.

    Regarding “Who did it”, you are spot on when you say that elements of the CIA and Pentagon have conspired with Mossad to set up 9/11. A former Italian President has confirmed this explanation: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it#Francesco_Cossiga

    Now, I would be very careful about accusing Jewish people and Israel of being the primary force behind 9/11, as done by Rebekah Roth, Chris Bollyn, and Kenneth O’Keef. Were American Jews and Mossad involved? Yes. Did they conceive and execute this huge operation on the U.S. soil? Unlikely. Did they help the U.S. deep state with the implementation? Yes.

    I would like to advance an argument that Jews have been used for propaganda purposes and as a distraction by the real powers that be, the worldwide intelligence community and their integral part, secret societies, in many key historical events in the recent past. Making it look like Jews are responsible for some horrible event is a clever ploy because it trips up an investigator and makes him or her look like a bigot or racist. Let’s start with Illuminati and the book “Pawns in the Game” by William Carr. When researching the Illuminati he found that the Illuminati often pretended to be Jews, to confuse commoners. William Carr has presented convincing evidence that the Russian Revolution of 1917 was set up by the World Revolutionary Movement with Illuminati at the helm. We often hear that the Russian Revolution was mostly brought about by Jews, but there is no hard evidence, it could be another clever misdirection. Two other remarkable researchers, Milton William Cooper and Ted Gunderson, have stated on many occasions that “It’s not the Jews,” namely, that the real powers that be are Illuminati/Satanist members of the intelligence community. This elite includes former Jews (in terms of religion), but Jews are not in charge of this group and this elite consists of all kinds of people in terms of ethnic or religious background. According to Cooper and Gunderson, advancing to the top of secret societies/intelligence community requires abandoning any traditional religion, such as Christianity or Judaism, and adopting Satanism or Luciferan ideology instead, which is what Illuminati are all about.

    Let’s take the Holocaust. Was it conceived by Jews? Not likely. It was conceived by the ruling elites of the Allies, i.e., the USSR, USA, and UK during WWII. This elite did not consist of Jews. Churchill and Roosevelt were both Freemasons, and there are some data that Stalin was a Freemason too, at least before the Russian Revolution. According to William Carr, Ted Gunderson, Bill Cooper, and other researchers, Freemasons have been infiltrated, absorbed by, or merged with Illuminati. Thus, Jewish people became accidental beneficiaries of the Allied propaganda, but the idea and implementation of the Holocaust were not the doing of Jews. Hitler was an antisemite, and it was convenient for the Allies demonize the enemy and to make up a story about Hitler gassing and cremating 6 million Jews. Of course, Jews helped with this hoax and benefited from it. The Allies still need the fairy tale of the Holocaust today because otherwise they would look like bloodthirsty power-hungry evil a..holes who sacrificed tens of millions of lives to stay in power when Hitler tried to overthrow the governments of UK and USSR. WWII was a battle of one evil against another evil, and the most mendacious evil won.

    Mass media is not controlled by Jews if you look one inch below the surface. The media is controlled by intelligence agencies, who place their operatives with fake names and biographies in various fake executive positions. The Jewish superrich are as fake as the official version of 9-11 events. I would argue that the superrich Jews are neither Jews nor superrich; they are intelligence operatives or assets with fake biographies. Again, the favorite trick of the intelligence community is to convince average citizens that everything is controlled by Jews (not by intelligence agencies). Many researchers, such as Miles Mathis, are fooled by this propaganda and are fixated on Jews.

    The idea that the world is ruled by bankers or Jewish bankers is pure nonsense. A banker cannot give orders to an agency that can kill anyone anywhere with legal immunity and has access to super advanced assassination technologies that will not raise any suspicions and are impossible to investigate, and can steal trillions from the federal budget with impunity (you can look up “missing 21 trillion”).

    Here is what Bill Cooper and Ted Gunderson said when they were asked whether the world is ruled by Jews:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqGpP-Tazrw (starts at 01:42:00)

    In this remarkable radio broadcast, aired on June 28, 2001, Bill Cooper predicted 9/11, i.e., a horrible terrorist attack on the U.S. soil that will happen soon and will be blamed on Osama bin Laden, he also explained why the secret world government is not headed by Jews:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoDV2RbIvJM (prediction of 9/11 starts at 00:24:30, discussion of Jewish people starts at 00:47:00)

    Regarding whether Richard Gage is controlled opposition, it is possible that he is, but it is also possible that he has found a comfort zone where he makes a good living. At this point, advocating unpopular points of view, e.g., the no-plane theory (even if he knows it is correct) will cause a loss of status and income. Judy Wood seems like an authentic researcher to me, with plenty of hangups, character flaws, and biases. I could be wrong. If one of them or both are controlled opposition, then it is unlikely that they are really Jewish, as explained above.

      1. You’re welcome and thanks for the video. I just watched it and gained some new knowledge on this topic. I find it amazing that not a single witness for the prosecution at the Zundel trials in the 1980s was able to confirm a death in a gas chamber in German camps. The mention of 6 million infected with the corona virus was great too.

    1. Mossad short for HaMossad leModiʿin uleTafkidim Meyuḥadim is the national intelligence agency of Israel. It is one of the main entities in the Israeli Intelligence, it is the national intelligence agency of Israel. It is one of the main entities in the Israeli Intelligence Community, along with Aman (military intelligence) and Shin Bet (internal security).

      Mossad is responsible for intelligence collection, covert operations, and counterterrorism. Mossad is separate from Israel’s democratic institutions. Because no law defines its purpose, objectives, roles, missions, powers or budget and because it is exempt from the constitutional laws of the State of Israel Mossad has been described as a deep state. Its director answers directly and only to the Prime Minister. Its annual budget is estimated to be around 10 billion shekels (US$2.73 billion) and it is estimated that it employs around 7,000 people directly, making it the second-largest espionage agency in the Western world, after the American CIA.
      Agency executive‎: ‎Yossi Cohen‎, Director
      Formed‎: ‎December 13, 1949 as the Central In…
      Parent agency‎: ‎Office of the Prime Minister
      Headquarters‎: ‎Tel Aviv, Israel

      Unless I am mistaken, it sounds like the Mossad is Jewish in origin, control and membership.


    2. If you know little or nothing of Ted Gunderson, I highly recommend the video that elitehobo cites. As hobo says, the part in regard to the Jewish influence starts at 142:00. Gunderson DOES make a distinction between Jews and Zionists which I and others on this blog have repeated many times. It’s a great video and has some amazing stories that Gunderson relates about his life. Unfortunately, he died about one year after that lecture. He was a true patriot in the ilk of Dr. Fetzer. Quie surprisingly, Wiki has a decent, albeit short write up on his life.

    3. AND, re the second video with Cooper, he makes the point that Jews are members of a religion and not a race. Those people involved in bringing about an NWO call themselves Jews, but they are not. He is very adamant (angrily so) that corporations run the media and Hollywood, not individual Jews.

    4. http://whale.to/b/israel_did_911.html
      Here is just one Quote:
      “Who leased the WTC only seven weeks before 9/11?
      Larry Silverstein — Explains his reason for purchasing the towers as “I felt a compelling urge to own them.” Larry had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant every single morning. On 9/11 he never showed up. Neither did his daughter who worked in building 7.”
      Does not this link alone show the Jews planned and executed this con? The goal was to get us into the war in Iraq.
      They also have been working hard to get us into war with Syria and they constantly illegally attack Syria. The US is in Syria totally illegally. How come so many Jews involved in 9/11/01 have gone unpunished after 19 years and counting?
      Did not Israel illegally attack the floatillas and illegally murder a number of innocent folks and nearly murder Ken O’Keefe? Have you watched this video of Ken O’keefe from 2016 at LAX? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqPofDjY0og

      Are not you just another shill for Israel using a phony name?

      1. WJA…Your conclusion could be feasible. Hobo provides those links, but as I said in my post, they actually do not support his thesis. It’s always important for myself to make a distinction between Zionist and Jews. If Jews are a religion and not a nationality, they are certainly the only religion that somehow deserves their own country. But I would say (and this is my own feeling backed by only intuition) that the average Jew in Israel identifies as a Jew and not an Israelite; as opposed to let us say the average American identifying as an American and not a Christian or any other religion. I could be wrong, but will continue along those lines. So, when we blame Israel for 9/11 et al, I actually think the blame should be at the feet of those who run Israel (the Mossad, the Rothschilds and the Zionists {with which the former two may well identify}. As an analogy, we certainly cannot blame the average American for the policies of the Deep State or even, for that matter, the visible ‘government’ (read ‘corporation).

        So, when Hobo says it’s not the Jews, he’s using words to serve his agenda and being disingenuous, knowing the average reader will not make any distinction between Zionists and Jews.

      2. Can you prove that Larry Silverstein is his real name and that he is who he says he is? Everything you know about Silverstein comes from mass media. Every war is immensely profitable and beneficial to the military industrial complex and the intelligence apparatus even if the war has no purpose other than enriching the military contractors and increasing the defense budget. I like Ken O’Keef but he is misled as explained in my post. According to my research, the U.S. Congress is teaming with intelligence operatives with fake names and fake biographies who got elected thanks to intelligence-controlled mass media. I believe that the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the government (not only in the USA) have long been infiltrated and subjugated by the only true power: intelligence community. It is quite possible that all real government functions have been transferred to an underground government because of the fake national emergency on 9/11 (the continuity of government system), and the visible U.S. government has been just a charade ever since. Obama is a homosexual married to a man pretending to be a woman, and he got elected President and virtually everyone believed he was a normal guy. Mass illusion is the norm.
        https://www.bitchute.com/video/ufWvL7pfvDL7/ (starting at 01:03:50)
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8BE5-2Y-gg (from start to finish)

  4. At the end of that Corbett vid, he asks: “will we reject the war on the invisible enemy before it’s too late? Whatever our choice, we had better make it quickly. A great reset is coming”.

    WE had better pray Trump is REALLY on the side of We the People. If not, bar some miracle or critical mass, we will be screwed beyond recognition. Trump has said we are fighting an invisible enemy. Let us hope that enemy is the DEEP STATE. If that is not what he refers to and he actually believes the ‘vid is real, we are lost.

    1. We are lost anyway.

      Surely you don’t believe a politician is going to turn this thing around.

      Wishful thinking won’t change a damn thing. If it did, people wouldn’t be wearing masks8 months into this.

  5. Today is 911 Day in Shanksville, PA. The usual BS is going on there with the President. Just remember that no plane was ever recovered from that hole. I was told by a CIA troll that the plane ”vaporized”….what a sick joke. Planes that crash into the ground do not vaporize. The EMT guys were told at the site when they went to find bodies or survivors to ”keep their mouths shut”. Its sad that Trump continues this charade.

    Lastly, old aerial photos show that the mining hole had been there for something like 20+ years….long before the fake Flight 93 hit the ground.

    The File pic….anyone see a huge plane in the hole? I guess even the dime-thin metal skin of the plane just went poof.
    We live in a very sick nation….imo.


  6. https://jameshfetzer.org/2020/09/on-c-span-richard-gage-leaves-9-11-truth-in-a-time-warp-2/
    https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/ Quote:
    “James H. Fetzer was born in Pasadena, California, on 6 December 1940. At graduation from South Pasadena High School in 1958, he was presented The Carver Award for leadership. He was magna cum laude in philosophy at Princeton University in 1962, where his senior thesis for Carl G. Hempel on the logical structure of explanations of human behavior won The Dickinson Prize. After being commissioned a 2nd Lieutenant in the Marine Corps, he became an artillery officer and served in the Far East. After a tour supervising recruit training in San Diego, he resigned his commission as a Captain to begin graduate work in the history and philosophy of science at Indiana in 1966. He completed his Ph.D. with a dissertation on probability and explanation for Wesley C. Salmon in 1970.
    His initial faculty appointment was at the University of Kentucky, where he received the first Distinguished Teaching Award presented by the Student Government to 1 of 135 assistant professors. Since 1977, he has taught at a wide range of institutions of higher learning, including the Universities of Virginia (twice), Cincinnati, North Carolina at Chapel Hill, New College of the University of South Florida, and now the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota, where he served from 1987 until his retirement in 2006. His honors include a research fellowship from the National Science Foundation and The Medal of the University of Helsinki. In 1996, he became one of the first ten faculty at the University of Minnesota to be appointed a Distinguished McKnight University Professor.
    He has published more than 100 articles and reviews and 20 books in the philosophy of science and on the theoretical foundations of computer science, artificial intelligence, and cognitive science. On this web page, his publications have been divided by area, including special vitae for computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, evolution and cognition, and his applied philosophical research on the death of JFK. His biographical sketch has appeared in many reference works, including the DIRECTORY OF AMERICAN SCHOLARS, WHO’S WHO IN THE MIDWEST, WHO’S WHO IN AMERICA, and WHO’S WHO IN THE WORLD. It may be found, for example, in the DIRECTORY OF AMERICAN SCHOLARS, 10th edition, WHO’S WHO IN AMERICA, 55th edition (2001), and WHO’S WHO IN THE WORLD, 18th edition (2001).”
    To all my old friends, and many more whom I did not know personally then or now, at Pasadena High School Class of 1956, I urge all of you to read the above article by Professor James Henry Fetzer, Ph.D., a former distinguished citizen and scholar also born and raised in our great City of Pasadena, whose remarkable career is described briefly above, and is one of the top scholars in the world on the understanding of the massive scam of 9/11/01, which has affected all of our lives in so many ways.
    Although Jim and I were raised at opposite ends of this great city, he in South Pasadena and I in Sierra Madre, we did not meet until about 2014, when he invited me to present a talk at a Conference on Academic Freedom held at the University of Illinois, Urbana Campus. Part of my presentation dealt with the sordid story of how a remarkable scholar by the name of Coates Johnson, Ph.D., Physics, University of California, Berkeley, who had been a former colleague of mine a the University of Georgia, Athens decades ago, had been secretly shafted from promotion by anonymous unethical secret misconduct by three other tenured faculty members at the University of Georgia. Ironically, the late Dr. Professor Johnson died the day before my presentation with Jim. Johnson had studied Einstein’s theory of General Relativity and should have been promoted to tenure rank decades ago but for the nefarious activities of these three individuals who placed their selfish interests above others. Coates was a top scholar and a friend.
    I urge all of you to read the remarkable paper by professor James Fetzer at the link above. Virtually everything we were told about this false flag attack were lies from the lying media according to the dictum by the genius level Founder of America:
    “Advertisements contain the only truths to be believed in a newspaper”. Thomas Jefferson. By the way, do you know who was really responsible for this massive crime on America and Humanity on 9/11/01? The name of the country has six letters and begins with and I and ends with and L. Many corrupt members of our totally outlaw Congress are dual citizens or main citizens with this totally corrupt pariah of the Middle East who daily fights with and steal lands from “neighbors”. A mountain of evidence and facts proves this statement. Wake up Americans; it may be too late now!
    All the best, Winfield Jonathan Abbe, A.B., Physics UC Berkeley, 1961, M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962 under the late Professor Earl Jacobs, Ph.D., Ph.D., Physics, UC Riverside, 1966 under the late Professor Peter E. Kaus, Ph.D., Institute of Science and Technology Fellow, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1966-1967 under Professor Marc Ross, Ph.D., Faculty member with lifetime tenure, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 1966-1978; voluntarily resigned due mainly to lying and cheating by two deans and three department heads for about 5 years. Citizen of Athens, Georgia for 54 years.

    1. Hey Winfield, is very weird that you would riddle us with code talk and game show antics about the name of a country in the middle east. That country is Israel and yes it is a mortal enemy of the United States. But on a positive note I do respect you for talking about this fact in your comment.

  7. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE…do not miss this interview….

    The Fetz Presents (8 September 2020) Jeff Prager, a conscientious, dedicated and brilliant student of 9/11 relates his collaborative research with four physicists, who figured out how the Twin Towers were destroyed using nuclear devices, which is the key to understand events in New York City. Knowing how it was done delimits the range of alternative explanations as to who was responsible and why, which organizations such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and Judy Wood and her DEW followers eschew, to their discredit.


    1. I would also ask Dr. Fetzer to please supply links to Prager’s Wix site and his info on Academia. I did not see anything in the description below the video. Not to be nit-picking, but I have to inquire if OR Prager know that Wix is an Israeli owned company. This of course, does not corrupt his incredible works, but it is a point of interest.

      1. I absolutely agree, he’s the best…. but I cannot understand why he or Prager give Dmitri Khalezov little credit for his contribution to the entire 9/11 false flag via an amazing 1096 page book called 9/11…The Third Truth for which he spent time in a Bangkok prison on trumped up charges. A friend bribed the guard and got him out, but as far as I know he’s still in hiding. He is mentioned in The Ground Zero Model; but to what degree, I do not know as I have yet to read the pdf.

      2. Khalezov and I have exchanged a few emails. I hope he is doing well. His writing is cutting edge concerning 911 details.
        The pic of Dmitri was taken recently.


  8. I signed the petition and got invited to the meetings by one guy. I even talked Richard Gage. He was a nice guy. I think ae911truth helped me, like “loose change” (where Alex Jones mussled in, but Bill Cooper predicted 911 before him and Bill Cooper got murdered by the cops). They all have the normal narrative (ae911truth& loose change,probably AJ) that planes hit the building., which is not accurate. Trump rang in on 911 and said it “had to be bombs” because of 1993 when the truck bomb blew out half the columns and it north tower did not fall down, but Trump never did anything about it, Trump was also worried about Larry Silverstein, but it looks like Larry never warned Trump, and lucky Larry is his “good friend”. All up James Fetxzer is the best on 911. Maybe Gage etc are all worried about getting concrete boots, if they get too accurate, mabe they are shills, I don’t know. James Fetzer bit the bullet and got a dodgey court fine. I have had one of them for work, they are disturbing. The inmates are running the assylum.

  9. This was not supposed to be photographed but this is a nuclear decontamination station at ground zero. The WTCs were the ground zero of mini nuclear bomb detonations. The workers are getting their shoes scrubbed of nuclear particle dust.

    On another note, there were hundreds of toilets in the WTC Towers. They are very robust objects made of high temperature fired ceramic. In the cleanup of the debris, not one was ever found. Only a nuclear explosion event could cause these to evaporate into dust.


    1. https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/amerithrax-or-anthrax-investigation

      If the bombing of the WTC didn’t scare the Americans, maybe a letter attack of anthrax would. This goofy and deadly attack came just a few weeks after 911. The childish death letters are on display at the National Postal Museum.

      The current government orchestrated pandemic is a reminder that most Americans are very easily scared and will do anything to feel safe.


      1. I went to my bank [Chase] last week and was greeted by another freakish scene. Everyone was wearing a mask. I had to use a pen, the teller gave me the pen to keep, saying that since I had the pen in my hand it was ”contaminated”, so now each customer gets a free pen. They also had a girl in tight pants with a alcohol spray bottle and paper towels in hand. After each customer left a counter, she would rush over, spritz the counter and wipe away the customer’s filthy fingerprints.

        Ahh….when will this nonsense end?

      2. That is pretty darn funny.

        Think about all the people participating in this charade. They have swallowed the hoax hook, line and sinker.

        I frankly think people this stupid don’t deserve to be free. I think the bankers have a point; there are too many stupid people cluttering up the planet.

      3. Did they “make” YOU put a mask on? They tried that in my bank, the one time I had to go in the lobby to wire some money. I refused. They could not do a thing. Not so at Paneras or Bulk Nation…I’m not done with them as yet. We must stand up or get on our knees. I have not shopped at Walmart for long before this hoax started. BUT, I had purchased a blender that started to leak recently. It was their brand, so they have to replace it. I called the corporate offices and asked what to do since I refused to enter the store with a mask and had to return the blender. After a big run-around and being transferred 6 times, they finally admitted I did not have to wear a mask if there were health reasons AND no one would ask. Now, I knew this because I had done a test run weeks ago to test their policy…so I just did it to bust their collective gonads and get them to admit I did not have to wear a mask. it’s all about INTIMIDATION and most will yield. I WILL NOT.
        I have heard that some of the stores now have some device at the entrance that checks temperatures. Has anyone here encountered that device at Walmart??

    2. Good picture Don. I moved to NYC in November of that year and was a Red Cross volunteer at ground zero. We were not allowed to take photos and had to wash our shoes every day before leaving.
      What very few people can explain is the molten steel that I and others saw and why it took three weeks to out out.

    3. “this is a nuclear decontamination station at ground zero” — By itself this foto doesn’t prove anything since it’s impossible to know for sure what’s going on — it was known the twin towers were full of asbestos (which could be seen as another reason to bring them down since the cost of removing it would have been prohibitive) — so it could just as easily be where dust full of asbestos particles was being washed off to help avoid spreading it off site (secondary exposure).

      Only the guys in yellow suits are wearing masks — one of the primary dangers of fission fallout is inhaling or ingesting long-lived alpha emitters, which stay in the body and irradiate surrounding tissue, raising the risk of cancer.

      1. Try this on for size


        and this


        At this point in time, to deny 9/11 was a nuclear event is to deny a mountain of evidence that shows otherwise. Truckload after truckload of dirt brought into the site was not used to plant a garden. Granite melted beneath the towers is not from jet fuel. Steel turning to dust is not a magic trick.

      2. “At this point in time, to deny 9/11 was a nuclear event is to deny a mountain of evidence that shows otherwise.” — I didn’t deny anything/say anything about whether the collapses were a “nuclear event” or not (I have no opinion about it; I have not spent nearly enough time looking into it) — I just said the foto above, in and of itself, does not prove anything/does not necessarily show a “a nuclear decontamination station”.

        You seem to have a reading comprehension problem — read my earlier reply to a comment by Dr Fetzer about this kind of thing.

      3. eah’s comment contains 80% information and 20% misinformation…commonly called trolling.
        Trolls come to this site to confuse and muddy the water. This person is like many that have been here before.


      4. LOL — actually, my reply to you just said that your foto is not conclusive proof of “a nuclear decontamination station” — how you get 80/20 out of that is anyone’s guess.

        Perhaps an analogy will help: if you visit Auschwitz, on one of the tours they will show you, behind glass, a room full of empty Zyklon-B containers, and say/imply this is proof of extermination — but it’s not: it is well known the Germans used a lot of Zyklon-B as a pesticide to kill lice (in order to stop typhus), including at Auschwitz — so this is a perfectly plausible and innocent explanation for the empty containers — in the same way, there are other possible plausible explanations for what is going on your foto — see how that works?

        It’s a good thing most 9/11 researchers are more thoroughgoing and rigorous than you are.

  10. I can’t dig much into 911 at the moment. Except to say this. One thing I think maybe most of us can agree on is the planes had nothing to do with the towers turning to dust and might have been a hologram. After seeing the Humpback whale jump out of the gymnasium floor, all bets are off on the videos of planes hitting the towers being real. Here’s the whale https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LM0T6hLH15k

    Do I have a point? The confoundment of throwing the kitchen sink at the towers could forever muddy the waters. What if it’s all the above? Directed energy, thermite, thermate, cutting charges and mini or micro nukes… maybe they had both kinds.
    The bastards that actually planned this thought no one will figure this out and they will be chasing their tales for decades like the JFK whacking. Just look at the thermate verses nuke verses directed energy debate. What if all of them were present? While the factions argue over small details, freedom became the real casualty.

    Why throw everything they had at the towers? Because flying a planeload of innocents into a building, that terror fades too fast and does not affect enough people for long enough. The symbology of the towers turning to dust? That is an indelible scar on the soul of America. That’s why it was so important to not just destroy the towers, but turn them to dust. I worked on 4 high rise projects during summers off from Engineering School. My buildings would laugh at planes hitting them. It’s a no contest between an iron mountain verses a flying beer can. Flying beer can just gets crushed every time. The News played a Jedi Mind Trick convincing people that it’s even physically possible for flying tin cans to hurt mountains. It is simply not possible. When i heard the towers described as hollow tubes where the “pin” is just pulled and they free fall like a sky diver, that’s an acid trip man. All you have to do is look at the construction photos to know that’s ludicrous.

    Now my own personal theory on the towers is that a few key explosives might have been built into the construction of the towers. I don’t consider this very likely but remotely possible. The reason I say this is the guys running construction projects go home at 3:30 on the jobs I worked on. Sometimes we would work until 7pm pouring steel re-enforced concrete structural walls. Usually it was just 3 laborers and a crane operator. That’s it. We could have dumped a dead body into any given pour and no one would ever know it was there. The same thing could happen with explosives. Did it happen at the twin towers construction? Unlikely but remotely possible. Now let’s turn to the Anthrax attacks as the ultimate pivot to strike fear into the heart of every American. This was very important to the over all effect of the 911 attacks. The attacks were on large symbols of power in large cities. After that terror faded a bit, the anthrax attacks hit creating a new wave of fear and trauma. People in tiny Kansas towns weren’t too worried about another 911 level of attack, but everyone gets Mail ! Think about the Anthrax attacks as the period at the end of a sentence. Diabolical beyond all reason!

    1. “the towers turning to dust” — The truly ENORMOUS, billowing dust clouds are the singular feature of the collapse of the twin towers, one the ‘official conspiracy theory’ doesn’t really explain — it’s generally assumed the dust came from the concrete floors, which were pulverized by the weight of the collapsing upper stories (certainly the fire could/did not produce all the dust) — but I think most people who bother to think about it know that cannot possibly explain the dust — I think this is partly why the nano-thermite hypothesis appeals to people: they see it as a way to explain the dust, which was produced as the tons of high explosives pulverized the concrete.

  11. https://www.redandblack.com/opinion/editorial-uga-s-lack-of-covid-19-planning-and-transparency-endangers-students-and-athens-residents/article_94f90616-eee8-11ea-8974-6b992d23e78e.html
    Part of the comment below was posted at the link above in the University of Georgia student newspaper. I once was employed at this school from 1966-1978 and attained lifetime tenure. I voluntarily resigned mainly due to lying and cheating by two deans and three department heads to the physics department tenured faculty for over 5 years. These liars were not fired, as they should have been, but rewarded. Although we grew up at opposite ends of Pasadena, California, I first met Jim in 2014 when he invited me to talk about all this corruption in the academy at the University of Illinois, Urbana. Only a giant like Jim would have the guts and intelligence to bring it out in the open.

    Thank you Augusta Stone for an excellent, concise and moving article on the dismal failure of the failed UGA President, Lawyer Morehead and former “honors classes” teacher, the easiest classes to teach at UGA. Everyone should ask themselves this question: “What is the most important issue in all of our lives during the past decade?” Answer: The criminal destruction of the Towers in NY on 9/11/01 and the many lies about that event to the gullible and ignorant and fooled public. This is where the two most hated subjects on campus, physics and logic, suddenly rise to the top where they always have been anyway! What better way to join the goals of individual study by students and enlightenment to the lies about this event to the public, than to make this understanding the goal this year: All members of the UGA community are to spend the year on individual study to reach the goals of TRUTH about what happened and why on 9/11/01 and dispel all the propaganda lies about this massive terrorist event to all members of UGA and the population in general. A number of distinguished scholars have studied this problem, but you won’t read about them in the local propaganda trash sheets called newspapers summarized by this great quotation by the genius Founder of America Thomas Jefferson: “Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper.” Here is a place to begin your study of the truth of the events of 9/11/01 by a top scholar, former U.S. Marine Corps officer, graduate of Princeton University and retired chaired professor from the University of Minnesota, Professor Dr. James Fetzer, Ph.D. who was from Pasadena,. California. https://www.bitchute.com/video/dXcC96cHz1s9/
    I graduated from UC Berkeley in physics in 1961. The Motto of the University of California is “Let There Be Light” or Fiat Lux in Latin. It means the goal of knowledge, truth and understanding no matter where that road may lead or how many propaganda lies, such as the lies told to the gullible public about 9/11/01, must be buried. By the way do you know who the giant first professor of physics and first president of this giant University of California was in 1868 at its founding? It was a top scholar and professor and physicist from Georgia John LeConte, M.D. who graduated from UGA, when it was one of the top schools of the world during the nineteenth century! John LeConte was responsible for setting the high standards at UC Berkeley which brought it to the top in the 20th century. He was from a magnificent botanical garden near Savannah! I went in and out of LeConte Hall, the Physics building at UC Berkeley every day from 1959-1961 and had no idea of all this great history. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics citizen for 54 years.

    Note: The fabulous life of John LeConte, M.D. is documented in this fabulous Ph.D. Dissertation:
    “From Physician to Physicist: The Scientific Career of John LeConte, M.D. 1818-1891” by John Samuel Lupold, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of History, University of South Carolina, 1970. Professor Dr. Lupold spent a career at a school in Georgia and rose to head of its history department. The above dissertation is one of the most important works ever written by a top history student like Dr. Samuel Lupold.

      1. This just supports my contention that Jews are a 5th column in the US.
        Ron Unz is the only Jew I can name that will publicly criticize the Tribe.

        Trump is joined at the hip with them.

      2. Yes. Disinformation agents gain credibility because (classically) 80% of what they say is true, 20% false. Gage does not discuss who did it and why. DO YOU APPRECIATE WHAT THAT MEANS? And his account of how it was done was refuted by me and Mark in 2011 (times 3). So if you want to praise a successful limited hang-out, by all means, toss accolades to Gage. He has intentionally massively misinformed the public about 9/11. He has encouraged skepticism, but he has grossly abused his position to conceal or cover-up what really happened for which I cannot abide the man.

      3. Dr Fetzer, at some point one should learn that if you evaluate everyone by sweeping, absolute criteria, then no one will pass muster — you will end up being very critical of many, which is attractive to very few.

        Also, I have heard you chastise others for faulty argumentation, yet here you mischaracterize my comment with words/phrases like “praise” and “toss accolades”, as well as mentioning the *substance of what Gage says/does not say*, whereas all I said was that he (and his organization) deserve (some) credit for helping popularize (general) skepticism re the ‘official conspiracy theory’ of 9/11 — I think it is not unfair to call this a ‘straw man’, which is a logical fallacy you are no doubt familiar with — so re any comments of mine, I’d appreciate it if you would not do this in the future — thanks in advance for that.

        Note: this article contains dead links, e.g. all of the links after “So what’s with Richard Gage and A&E911 that they are still promoting a theory that T. Mark Hightower and I proved was indefensible in three articles published on …” are dead — also, the presentation “Proof of Ternary Fission in New York City on 9/11″ is not readily available.

        Suggestion: proofread this article and try to fix the dead/inaccessible links.

        Thanks for your work.

      4. eah…I understand your point in regard to Dr. Fetzer’s criticism of Gage. But I would make the following distinction. Any researcher worth his salt makes errors in judgment sometimes due to the current information available that is later updated or a misinterpretation of data or just a simple error of same sort. Most will later correct it (as in the case of Jeff Prager), update it or admit some error. Gage has had years of opportunity and access to do just that. As far as I know, he never has. So, one would have to weigh what is obviously bad or dis-information to throw the average reader off track against the idea that at least he’s getting folks away from the official narrative. Do we want one lie replaced with another or do we want the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. I KNOW what I expect. You?.

  12. Yes, NY City was nuked on 911…not one time but at least twice on the same day. The City of NY knew it was nuclear even before it happened. This is because they had a fleet of dump trucks loaded and ready to go to Ground Zero. These trucks spread tons of special resin earth on the site to soak up the radiation.

    The idea that there were planes and Arabs involved is a ridiculous charade. Many people believe the mini nukes were former US Army munitions that were updated in the Demona, Israel nuclear weapons compound. The mini nukes came into the US in diplomatic cargo from Israel and were never checked through Immigration, which was common and legal in those days. These mini nukes were delivered to the WTC by taxi and were monitored from Building 7.

    There’s nothing like having a US city nuked by your own weapons….eh?


    1. The above pic is what a mini nuke bomb case looks like, the weight is 30 lbs. The micro nukes are much smaller and can fit into a briefcase. The one above will fit into a military duffel bag and can easily be carried…see the handles on the side.

      The pic is a comparison of the 911 bomb and the test of a similar bomb. They look rather similar.

      This Post by Jim Fetzer is an excellent overview of 911. Good comment Salty. I guess with no pics allowed, they were trying to hide something. Plus, what about the blue flames at Ground Zero that gave off no heat? So many lies have been told about 911 they would fill several huge volumes.



Leave a Reply