William de Berg, COVID-19 Vaccine Wars and Waves

William de Berg

The vaccine wars are heating up.   On the one side, there is the Western champion, Pfizer, allied with BioNtech and the Gates Foundation.   It has largely defeated its two main rivals, AstraZeneca (AZ) and Johnson & Johnson (J&J), the former of which was very fast out of the starting gate before being banned from a number of nations around the Western world.   On the other side are the two main Chinese competitors Sinovac and Sinopharm, with the Russian Sputnik V tagging along behind with Indian and other vaccines in the mix.

The vaccine wars, more charitably referred as “vaccine diplomacy”, have created enormous friction around the world, with Western governments and media bashing the Russian and Chinese vaccines and the Chinese and Russian media and governments bashing the Pfizer vaccine.   There is little question that the Chinese and Russian vaccines are winning at the moment.[1]   China is already exporting to several dozen nations, many of them large ones such as Indonesia, Philippines, Pakistan, and Brazil, with plans to export to nearly one hundred in time, mainly to Eurasia, Africa, and Latin America.   Russia is also exporting worldwide to populous nations such as India and Turkey and  even to many European nations without approval of the European Union.   There are several reasons for the Chinese and Russian leads.  First, China and Russia both have emphasized export of their vaccines while their own populations are being vaccinated less rapidly than in the West, whereas Western governments initially concentrated on vaccinating their own populations.   Also, China and Russia have been offering their vaccines at low cost or even free in some cases and are softly working with governments, whereas Pfizer in particular has been very demanding in negotiations with such nations as India, South Africa, Brazil, and Argentina.[2]   Another plus for the Chinese and Russian vaccines is that they are designed using more traditional vaccine technology and do not require expensive storage and handling at extremely low temperatures.    An even harder-to-gauge reason for the greater success of the Chinese and Russians is the resentment and suspicion of many non-Western governments toward the Western vaccine manufacturers and the Gates Foundation in particular.

At first glance, the vaccine competition is somewhat strange.   Given the low cost of most of the vaccines (< $5 for AZ, $10 for Sputnik V and J&J), and the fact that they are being donated in large numbers, the amount of profit to be made even if everyone in the world would get vaccinated is a few billion at most, with very little of it coming from private expenditures.   This is miniscule in comparison to the global pharmaceutical industry’s total revenues of over one trillion dollars.   So, except for Pfizer’s relatively expensive vaccine ($19.50), few manufacturers are going to make much money, especially if COVID vaccinations aren’t recurring purchases like leading prescription drugs.   There will inevitably be a huge oversupply of stock as the world may produce over 12 billion vaccine doses by the end of 2021[3]—1.5 doses for every human– as demand for the vaccines comes in far below expectations in a host of nations.   Even in the United States, the second-most vaccinated nation, the demand for vaccinations has fallen off a cliff and it now appears that less than half the population will end up being fully vaccinated.[4]   There is the further issue of the longevity of the vaccine effectiveness if the coronavirus is indeed mutating, which may them more difficult to sell in the future.

There may be something much more important at stake for the West, however.   As part of the Western elites’ “Great Reset” plan towards “sustainability”, massive, involuntary depopulation is a not-so-hidden  goal.   One of the most prominent members of the Western elites—Bill Gates—is famously on record as stating that vaccines will help in the depopulation effort.[5]    It seems ludicrous that something intended to save lives help could help depopulate the world—unless there is something else that is contained in them.    Indeed, the Pfizer vaccine has been criticized for its effects on placental formation because its mRNA-stimulated “spike” protein designed to stimulate the immune system against the coronavirus could interfere with placental formation.[6]    There are thousands of reports of menstrual and other reproductive-related issues following vaccine administration,[7] which may or may not be related to future infertility problems in vaccinated women.

The “Western” semi-final round in which Pfizer’s vaccines beat out AZ’s and J&J’s is very illuminating in this regard.   Despite the former’s association with nursing home deaths in Norway and elsewhere, it was the two traditional vaccines (Astra and J&J) that were banned because of their supposedly greater potential for creating blood clots: AZ’s was banned in much of Europe and in Australia, and J&J was banned in the United States.   Given that blood clotting is rare following vaccine injections compared to the more than 10,000 deaths and serious injuries already reported,[8] it is strange that the Pfizer vaccine was favored over the other two traditional ones.   Some European nations such as Italy were pressured politically into banning AZ despite much evidence that it is as safe and effective as Pfizer’s.[9]  (In reality, all the COVID vaccines are of basically the same effectiveness (85-95%) in clinical trials, although real-world effectiveness is generally much lower and varies considerably depending on where the vaccines are administered.   Moreover, effectiveness is all relative since in the original Pfizer trial of more than 40,000 participants no one died of COVID in either the vaccinated or unvaccinated group.)

This all begs the question as to why the Pfizer vaccine won out over the other Western-designed ones.   The key evidence comes from Australia, where the tenuous blood clot argument led to restrictions on the AZ vaccine—but only for the under-50 population.[10]   This seems very strange, since the median age of pulmonary embolisms is around 70 years,[11] so any blood clotting risk should mandate the AZ be banned for those overnot under 50 years of age, given the rarity of dangerous blood clots in the younger group.   (By contrast, Pakistan is mainly giving the Pfizer to its over-60 population, relying mainly on Chinese COVID vaccines for other groups.)  So, are those of child-bearing years in the West being steered toward Pfizer because of some other hidden agenda—namely, that it was designed to be more effective in disrupting reproduction?

In the end, winning out in the Western world only managed to get Pfizer into the worldwide finals.  The Western elites know that their goal of depopulation won’t be achieved if Pfizer is limited mainly to Western nations, where populations are already declining and demand for vaccines is weakening.   The big depopulation prizes are in those nations with large populations and/or above-average fertility, such as India, Brazil and South Africa.    Unfortunately, for Pfizer, it was until now largely being cut out from these critical markets—in India, because of regulatory approval problems, and in Brazil and South Africa because of cost and indemnity demands.   That has changed given the recent alleged COVID-19 crises in these nations, each of which is suffering from widely advertised local coronavirus “variants”.    Prior to these crises, known variously as the “Second Wave” or “Third Wave”,  India and Brazil had largely ended the coronavirus threat, but a new round of COVID-19 transmission suddenly appeared in early spring.     To what extent the new COVID wave in India in particular is a combination of increased testing and an over-hyping by Western media and governments is debatable,[12],[13] but what cannot be denied is the  enormous pressure of Western governments and media suddenly being applied to the afflicted nations to deploy the Pfizer vaccines.   The pressure on India is especially strange since heretofore India—often referred to as the “pharmacy of the world” and a leading exporter of COVID vaccines—is behind only China and the United States in number of vaccinations and has already contracted with other vaccine manufacturers in addition to producing vaccines of its own.    Suspicions are especially raised by the “fake” COVID news stories promulgated by the Western media,  such as the passing off of pictures of individuals lying dead on the streets from a gas leak in 2020 in India as COVID fatalities.[14]   Thus far, there has been some movement in Pfizer’s direction in India and Brazil—e.g., Brazil’s medical authorities have questioned the risk of the adenovirus used in the Sputnik V[15]—but this may yet peter out.

After the Western elites failed miserably in Vietnam and the Southwestern Asia and Northern Africa wars of the past several decades, they seem to be desperately searching for victories in the COVID vaccine wars.  If Pfizer misses out in the end, though, that could force the elites to regroup and rethink their dream of a vaccine-mediated depopulation of the world.

William de Berg is the pen name of an American scientist and author of four conspiracy/truther fiction novels: Serpent and Savior, White Spiritual Boy, Divided We Stand, and Shield Down.   


[1] https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-diplomacy-us-europe-and-west-losing-battle-influence-to-china-and-russia/e6985095-4527-4956-9062-69fbe22040e7

[2] https://www.nationofchange.org/2021/02/23/held-to-ransom-pfizer-demands-governments-gamble-with-state-assets-to-secure-vaccine-deal/

[3] https://punchng.com/covid-19-manufacturers-to-produce-12-billion-doses-in-2021-distribution-controlled-by-powerful-countries

[4] https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-trends

[5] https://www.bitchute.com/video/cCOlxBfZCN06/

[6] https://principia-scientific.com/head-of-pfizer-research-covid-vaccine-is-female-sterilization/

[7] https://www.thecollegefix.com/researchers-launch-project-on-covid-vaccines-and-menstruation-after-problems-reported

[8] https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/no_author/number-of-covid-vaccine-injuries-reported-to-vaers-surpasses-50000-cdc-data-show/

[9] https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1411000/BBC-Katya-Adler-AstraZeneca-Italy-vaccine-news-latest-update-vn

[10] https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/getting-vaccinated-for-covid-19

[11] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7550106/

[12] https://off-guardian.org/2021/05/04/indias-covid-outbreak-the-need-for-scientific-integrity-not-sensationalism

[13] https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/25/indias-covid-crisis-has-been-hijacked-the-mainstream-media-are-lying-to-you/

[14] https://ncdailygazette.com/2021/04/27/ny-post-removes-fake-image-of-covid-deaths-after-being-busted-on-social-media/

[15] https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/brazil-regulator-rejects-sputnik-vaccine-russia-cries-foul-77349025

Please follow and like us:

18 thoughts on “William de Berg, COVID-19 Vaccine Wars and Waves”

  1. This is from Stone….posting it in full because it’s that important and I have not heard his interpretation anywhere else.

    One hour of Covid shots detected by stud finders, metal detectors and magnets.

    REPEAT: I have definitely figured out why the covid vaccine is causing blood clots.

    They are claiming the spike protein does it and yada yada. That’s not it at all. The real reason why the covid vaccine is causing blood clots is because the only readily available metal in your body is the iron in the blood, and the vaccine has nanobots that are attacking the blood to get that iron so they can build something with it. And your body has been re-programmed genetically after the shot to produce more nanobots, which attack the blood more.
    The shot is the most sinister thing ever done out in the open, while in secret.

    WAIT FOR IT: Massive mandatory vaccine mandates.

    I have already stated that once the magnet topic went viral, they’d then get tough and make the shot MANDATORY. And that’s exactly what they are trying to do, if people can’t be suckered into it they will be forced into it. Already more than 200 colleges have made the vax mandatory for attendance. It is not yet illegal to not be vaccinated, but they are going to try it, just wait. And the reason is because when people see the results of the vaccine in a tangible way which a magnet sticking to someone definitely is, they are going to resist, and that resistance will be met with force
    Vaccine injection sites will likely necrophy and turn into huge open sores.

    We are only at the beginning of this, but it is clear the clotting is happening because the blood is attacked by the vaccine so something metallic can be built at the injection site, (or wherever else the vax is programming people’s bodies to build things,) and that’s not known yet – however, when you look at how wide an area some of these injection sites are being built out to, it is becoming obvious that whatever is being built might start cutting off blood flow to the surrounding tissue, and if that progresses far enough, the surrounding tissue will die. We are probably a few months away from seeing huge and open sores on people from the vax. Simple rationality says so.
    The world will soon change in huge ways no one ever thought or dreamed of. The genie is out of the bottle, that vax has already fundamentally changed those who received more than saline. Since when have people had a magnetic spot? That’s a fundamental change in their existence. This won’t end well, bet on it.
    The Magneto protein reports are legit, the vax is clearly for remote mind control
    100 percent of the information in the quoted report below is from 2016 or earlier, they had time to work on this. This is what the vax is, obviously.
    The vax is supposed to install a remote controllable system into people’s brains that will make the controllers able to force people to believe or act on whatever the controllers want
    This would be the end of free agency, and a reason for the Lord to return –
    From The Guardian, in 2016 (which means this tech is older than that)Genetically engineered ‘Magneto’ protein remotely controls brain and behavior
    “Badass” new method uses a magnetized protein to activate brain cells rapidly, reversibly, and non-invasively
    Researchers in the United States have developed a new method for controlling the brain circuits associated with complex animal behaviors, using genetic engineering to create a magnetized protein that activates specific groups of nerve cells from a distance. In recent years, researchers have developed a number of methods that enable them to remotely control specified groups of neurons and to probe the workings of neuronal circuits.
    Several earlier studies have shown that nerve cell proteins which are activated by heat and mechanical pressure can be genetically engineered so that they become sensitive to radio waves and magnetic fields, by attaching them to an iron-storing protein called ferritin, or to inorganic paramagnetic particles. These methods represent an important advance – they have, for example, already been used to regulate blood glucose levels in mice – but involve multiple components which have to be introduced separately.
    The new technique builds on this earlier work, and is based on a protein called TRPV4, which is sensitive to both temperature and stretching forces. These stimuli open its central pore, allowing electrical current to flow through the cell membrane; this evokes nervous impulses that travel into the spinal cord and then up to the brain.
    Guler and his colleagues reasoned that magnetic torque (or rotating) forces might activate TRPV4 by tugging open its central pore, and so they used genetic engineering to fuse the protein to the paramagnetic region of ferritin, together with short DNA sequences that signal cells to transport proteins to the nerve cell membrane and insert them into it.
    When they introduced this genetic construct into human embryonic kidney cells growing in Petri dishes, the cells synthesized the ‘Magneto’ protein and inserted it into their membrane. Application of a magnetic field activated the engineered TRPV1 protein, as evidenced by transient increases in calcium ion concentration within the cells, which were detected with a fluorescence microscope.
    Next, the researchers inserted the Magneto DNA sequence into the genome of a virus, together with the gene encoding green fluorescent protein, and regulatory DNA sequences that cause the construct to be expressed only in specified types of neurons. They then injected the virus into the brains of mice, targeting the entorhinal cortex, and dissected the animals’ brains to identify the cells that emitted green fluorescence. Using microelectrodes, they then showed that applying a magnetic field to the brain slices activated Magneto so that the cells produce nervous impulses.
    To determine whether Magneto can be used to manipulate neuronal activity in live animals, they injected Magneto into zebrafish larvae, targeting neurons in the trunk and tail that normally control an escape response. They then placed the zebrafish larvae into a specially-built magnetized aquarium, and found that exposure to a magnetic field induced coiling manouvres similar to those that occur during the escape response. (This experiment involved a total of nine zebrafish larvae, and subsequent analyses revealed that each larva contained about 5 neurons expressing Magneto.)
    In one final experiment, the researchers injected Magneto into the striatum of freely behaving mice, a deep brain structure containing dopamine-producing neurons that are involved in reward and motivation, and then placed the animals into an apparatus split into magnetized a non-magnetized sections. Mice expressing Magneto spent far more time in the magnetized areas than mice that did not, because activation of the protein caused the striatal neurons expressing it to release dopamine, so that the mice found being in those areas rewarding. This shows that Magneto can remotely control the firing of neurons deep within the brain, and also control complex behaviors.
    Neuroscientist Steve Ramirez of Harvard University, who uses optogenetics to manipulate memories in the brains of mice, says the study is “badass”.
    MY COMMENT: This tech is old. Old enough for all of this to be said in a 2016 report. Once this was discovered, there’s little question Gates and others got to work to immediately figure out how to make a shot which when injected in the arm was able to build whatever was wanted in the brain. The shot probably commands the body to produce nanobots that build whatever they want, wherever they want and it has to attack the blood to get the iron for the magneto protein thus resulting in clots.
    And more – the covid swabs which swabbed the cribriform plate which is right on the brain probably had this tech in them too.

    Whatever this shot does probably connects to 5G, just like everyone feared.

    1. This is just a shot in the dark (pun intended), but would it not follow that within a few months, if these nanobots are constructing “receivers and/or transmitters” from the iron in the blood, many who received the jab/injection are going to be experiencing anemia…..anyone have any feedback?

      1. There are lots of other things in COVID-19 vaccines, as well as established ones, to improve vaccine effectiveness; these are called adjuvants. Recently, iron has been added to the list of adjuvants, which would indeed magnetize the site of the injection: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33465476. I don’t know the significance or risks of these substances.

  2. Good point. I am simply using standard lingo, but obviously the Pfizer and Moderna jabs are self-replicating genetic insertions and not traditional vaccines.

      1. Thanks, Salty. The use of iron has potentially been linked to allergies and blood clots: e.g., https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325788. But I cannot find if Pfizer or other vaccines actually contain iron, as opposed to lipid, nanoparticles. The ominous thing about the West’s support for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines is that much evidence suggests that they are much more dangerous than the AstraZeneca: https://www.thehealthsite.com/news/post-vaccination-deaths-from-pfizer-is-far-more-than-from-astrazeneca-jabs-sputnik-study-809914/

    1. You’re very welcome William. I do think that the Pfizer vaccine do contain trace metals but I’ll do a deep dive and find out for sure and post a link here.
      I think Pfizer is far more dangerous due to their sordid history with the Department of Justice and its major lawsuit back in 2009. The same year I got out the US Navy and was finishing off my RN degree. One of the whistleblowers is a retired Navy captain & physician who I knew personally who provided intel on the kickbacks to DOD and BUMED personnel. And this doctor also prescribed Zyvox to active duty personnel and I as a ole Marine doc administered it along with other drugs Pfizer sold us.


      1. Zyvox had severe adverse reactions to alcohol and antidepressants.
      2. Geodon prescribed for anxiety disorders (Which most combat deployments can cause) this drug had major issue causing severe skin reaction and Tardive Dyskinesia which still affects many post Gulf War veterans and their dependents.
      3. Last year while the scamdemic kept everyone busy this was happening.
      Let’s see if any whistleblowers come forward with the undisclosed nanotechnology that is being injected into everyone who gets the jab.

      1. Yes, Big Pharma and the medical establishment are corrupt, Pfizer among the worst. At least Merck had the decency to get out of the COVID vaccine race, admitting that even a well-intentioned vaccine was no match for the natural herd immunity provided by coronavirus exposure. BTW, I researched the USS Roosevelt that you mentioned in a comment to one of my earlier posts. Out of the ~5000 sailors on the ship. 1156 tested positive for COVID (the Navy eventually stopped reporting tallies) and one supposedly died of COVID (but who knows?). This would be associated with a case-fatality rate of <.01%–in the normal annual flu range. By contrast, over 4500 sailors died on the Spanish Flu in 1918.

        Now the sick bastards are trying to give the Pfizer and Moderna "vaccines" to teenagers and young children–who never suffer from COVID–since no more adults want them.

      2. In 1918 many cities considered a whole city quarantines but rejected it as UNNESSESARY. Only a few private homes were quarantined.

        It seems that people have gotten very stupid in the past 100 years. Especially someone named Dr. Fauci.

        Combine Dr. Fauci with President Trump and millions of people ride a fast train into a hell of death.

  3. William…There is much to be said of this article, but the question that rises above any others is what is your premise for calling these injections vaccinations?

    1. Exactly….there NEVER has been an injection of the type that is now going into millions of people’s arms .

      This injection is made to alter genes among other things…..its experimental.


Leave a Reply