Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: Is the United State Deliberately Committing Judicial Murder?

Jim Fetzer

As it happens, John Remington Graham, B.A., LL.B., a retired professor of law, who remains qualified to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, submitted an amicus curiae brief on behalf of three citizens of the United States, James Fetzer, Ph.D., Mary Maxwell, Ph.D., LL.B., and Cesar Baruja, M.D., on behalf of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who had been tried and convicted of the Boston marathon bombing. In this brief and its accompanying appendix (initially submitted to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, subsequently to the US Supreme Court), Attorney Graham outlined proof that Dzhokhar cannot be guilty of the crime of which he has been convicted for the obvious reason that the backpacks don’t match!

Most of us recall from the O.J. Simpson trial that Johnny Cochran made the mantra that, “If the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit!” But in that case, the incriminating (skin-tight fitting) bloody glove found at the scene of the crime was (flagrantly) used to exonerate O.J. by having him put on a latex glove before the bloody one, which guaranteed that it would not fit. That was deliberate. In the case of Dzhokhar, the images of the brothers at the scene of the crime (which appear to have been photoshopped in) were flawed by not insuring the backpacks they were wearing in the footage corresponded to the backpacks that exploded (which were rather compact black nylon). This, by contrast, was a stupendous blunder.

Here are the four photographs included as attachments to our brief, where the first (Exhibit 1) shows one of the two pressure-cooker bombs that exploded at the scene; the second (Exhibit 2) shows the type of pressure cooker that was used for this purpose; the third (Exhibit 3) shows one of the two (identical) black nylon backpacks in which they were carried to the scene; and the fourth (Exhibit 4) shows that neither Tamerlan nor Dzhokhar was wearing a backpack of the kind the FBI identified as having exploded at the scene. Tamerlan, notice, is wearing a larger and bulkier backpack not similar in design to those that exploded, while Dzhokhar is wearing a whitish (or silver) backpack. They obviously don’t match! 

In correspondence with Jack Graham, the First Circuit informed him that the evidence we had adduced for its consideration would be taken into account; but when the time came for its ruling, it was as though the proof of their innocence did not even exist. When the case was appealed to the US Supreme Court, therefore, Jack was on the case (assisted by funds from the three of us) and submitted another amicus brief, this time to the highest court in the land. We know that our submission has been received, because it has been acknowledged on the docket of the United States Supreme Court, which you can verify for yourself.

Concerned that we not experience a repetition of what we incurred with the First Circuit, therefore, Jack has written to Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Acting Solicitor General of the United States (3 July 2021) and subsequently to Ginger Anders, Dzhokhar ‘s Attorney (16 July 2021), reaffirming our concerns that the United States Supreme Court not engaged in an act of judicial murder. Review the key argument of our brief and his letters to the Solicitor General and form your own conclusion.  If you think something is terribly, terribly wrong, consider making the effort yourself to follow up our efforts by writing to them on your own behalf and that of the United States of America.

RE: United States v. Tsarnaev, No. 20-443 on the docket of the United States Supreme Court

From: <>
Sent: Saturday, July 3, 2021 7:34 AM
To: ‘’ <>
Subject: United States v. Tsarnaev, No. 20-443 on the docket of the United States Supreme Court


To the Acting Solicitor General of the United States:

Counsel, — Our attention has been called to the recent administrative order of the new attorney general calling for review of pending federal death penalty cases.  While things of this kind are typically punctuated by hypocritical partisan political theatrics, we believe that the case of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev deserves special attention, because, as our amicus submission of May 5, 2021, including appendix, points out clearly enough, the prosecution was political from the outset, including gross abuse of the First Amendment by major news media which systematically suppressed obvious and decisive exculpatory evidence, while lawyers on both sides of the case acted improperly, pretending that such evidence did not exist at all, so that the accused was not prosecuted fairly, or represented at all, and the death penalty was imposed for political reasons in the knowledge that the accused could not have been guilty.  For your convenience, I attach extra copies of our submission and appendix of May 5, 2021 for your review.  I pray that this inhuman, ridiculous “false flag” masquerade come to an end.  The first reform of the death penalty must be that intentional misconduct of prosecutors and court-appointed counsel for the accused, tacitly approved by judicial officers, together with uncivilized  journalism of major news media, as we have seen in this case since April 15, 2013, should be eliminated.  Before we settle limitations in which the death penalty may lawfully be imposed, it would help if we got rid of judicial murder.   – John Remington Graham, a member of the Bar of the United States Supreme Court (admitted August 5, 1971, #83902).

Copies to Dr. James Fetzer, Dr. Mary Maxwell, Dr. Cesar Baruja, friends of the court, and Ginger Anders, Esq., court-appointed counsel for Mr. Tsarnaev, before the United States Supreme Court

Amicus Curiae Brief


For those who may want to learn more about the Boston bombing, as in the case of Sandy Hook, I have brought together a dozen experts (in that case, thirteen), including Sheila Casey, Sterling Harwood, J.D., Ph.D., Dr. Eowyn, Ph.D., Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D., James F. Tracy, Ph.D., Mike Palecek, Allan William Powell, John W. Whitehead, J.D., Craig McKee, Ole Dammegard, Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D., and Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., to sort out what really happened. has banned the book (of course), but it remains available at

Please follow and like us:

15 thoughts on “Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: Is the United State Deliberately Committing Judicial Murder?”

  1. Pingback: 333 Disarray: The Boston Bombing Investigative Report by Stephanie Sledge
  3. Add to this the likelihood that the “Dzhokhar Tsarnaev” that they have in prison is not Dzhokhar Tsarnaev at all.

    -NYT, 3-30-15:

    “The jurors have not heard his voice. Nor has the public, as he has been barred from giving interviews. He spoke briefly in court in 2013 after the bombings, but he used an accent that his friends said they did not recognize…”

    -Boston Globe, 7-10-13:

    “Payack and some wrestlers said Tsarnaev’s “not guilty” answers seemed to reflect a foreign accent, which is not how they recall him speaking.”

    1. If a civilian gets involved with government paramilitary organizations such as the FBI, CIA, etc. and participates in their operations…at the end of it, your life is not worth 2 cents.

      File: This is the patsy who never fired a single shot and paid the ultimate price for his involvement with the government of the US. Foolish mistake Mr. Oswald.


  4. Pingback: Globeinfolive
  5. Jim, Check your high up military sources… retired brass says the word has been un-offically put out from fairly high ranks … “get your houses in order” … get supplies now before the deep state shuts down the supply of everything. This is the second source I have heard in the last couple days. The gentleman re-iterated what an independent source said about trucker traffic curtailing greatly on several big road in different states. and about container ships sitting off the coast unloaded, trains sitting idle, etc. This man says we have been targeted for elimination. I have heard this so many times, I had stopped believing it. Now I wonder. We need more information if you can get it. Thanks

    1. This sort of talk has been going on for a long time Dave. If people haven’t had their sh*t together for the past few years then it is quite late in the game.

      The intentional effort by the controllers to keep us loners and not see our human connection in others is what is more dangerous then any supply shut down. This will trigger mob rule. Get to working on connecting with your neighbors and form a coalition based on a combination of skills. No Rambos gonna make it after a few months.

      People can live on far less callories then they are currently pigging out in. Friends and family will be our strength.

  6. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s mother has said that her son told her that he been speaking with the FBI for a year before the BM event. Why was Dzhokhar talking to the FBI?

    Also, if the explosion had been a real bomb that was capable of removing legs and feet from a person, it would have broken windows across the street, from the blast effect. Not one window was broken. The blast would have also removed most of the clothing from the victims.

    One has to swallow gallons of the kool-aide to believe the nonsense of this sloppy hoax.

    File: I have several hundred photos in my BM files that reveal that ALL of the “wounded” were prior amputees. They were crisis actors that day and were pretending they had lost a limb.


  7. So, there still may be a chance, but up until now they have ignored the evidence presented.. How is this possible? Has there been a similar case in which presented evidence was blatantly ignored? And if so, what was the outcome?
    I see this as yet another example of the courts being under an agenda where the judgment can only go the way of that agenda and any evidence will be ignored or simply deemed “not enough”.
    Once again, this proves what is left of this country is a shadow of dust as on 9/11 that will just collapse into it’s own profile and disappear.

  8. Jim, so glad you and others are still working on the BM false flag. The photo of the older brother getting into a police cruiser naked and then later seeing his mangled body on an autopsy table is not only sickening but in one’s face proof that SOMETHING was very wrong about the whole event.

    1. We know that Barack Obama was deeply involved in the BM hoax from day-one.

      In my previous comment the name should have been Tamerlan. He was the older brother who was talking to the FBI.

      File: the photo is Tamerlan age 26 standing naked in police custody, an hour later he was dead.


      1. He was identified in that photo by his Aunt.

        This is the sickening one that shows you what can happen when they want you dead… :-/


Leave a Reply