Allow me to pretend that I’m teaching a high school class on “How to think.” The problem before us is the allegation by government and media in 2012 that a school shooting took place in Connecticut, at which 20 children and 4 staff members died. Is there any chance it is a “psy-op” story, meant to scare people? (Or even just meant to check up on people’s gullibility?)
I myself have written at book-length about three false stories — the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, the 2014 Sydney siege, and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. I have some suspicion that the Sandy Hook event is a psy-op, but I haven’t researched it. Let’s see if there is a way to arm-chair evaluate its veracity. I want students to know that they do not have to wait till they have proof in hand to form an intelligent opinion.
Point # 1. There’s a barrier to investigating Sandy Hook, since it involves tragedy. Granted, it’s horribly impolite to show disrespect to bereaved parents. But we can counteract that barrier as follows: (a) We could inquire only about the 4 staff members who died. (b) As regards all 24 who died, if there was a life insurance policy it is normal business for proof of the death to be presented. (c) Sandy Hook had a major impact on society, so it’s proper to take a devil’s advocate pose in researching it. Anyone can muse hypothetically “What if there were no deaths?”
Point #2. There is fear of forcible reprisal. Dear Students, pretend you are a journalist, or have a designated role in protecting society, such as that of a clergyperson. Someone comes to you with information that contradicts the official story of Sandy Hook. What could you do? Many journalists and clergy will not even undertake the simple mission of raising the matter.
I’ll bet they think it’s the sensitive issue of the parents’ tragedy that keeps them silent. But more likely it is fear of force. Two inquiring men have already felt force: Jim Fetzer, PhD, of Wisconsin was sued for $450,000 (for claiming a child’s death certificate was fake) and the Florida home of Wolfgang Halbig was raided in the middle of the night because he emailed the victims. (Yes, First Amendment allows emailing, but his email was deemed harassment, a misdemeanor.)
Students, it’s wise to ‘red flag’ any attacks made on critics of news stories. Those attacks can be seen as circumstantial evidence of protection of crime, aka, coverup of a crime. Coverup — along with the destroying of evidence — is a standard Blackstonian crime. And by the way, it is a principle of law that everything can be presumed against the despoiler of evidence! “Omnia praesumuntur, contra spoliatorem.” Ah, the law is gorgeous.
Point #3. Apply common sense. What else can we look at, to judge the story’s veracity? Just use your life experience to measure the likelihood that Adam Lanza, age 20, shot all those kids. And try to work out the logic of why he would kill his mother, Nancy Lanza, before the killing spree, and shoot himself dead, afterward.
Dwell upon oddities. If Adam knew he was going to end up dead, what was the point of killing Mom (Nancy Lanza)? In Australia’s 1996 Port Arthur massacre, Martin Bryant was said to have shot dead two hoteliers before he went on the rampage. Why? “because of an old grudge.” Logic says you don’t suddenly kill folks who, many years ago, gave you a minor hurt. It doesn’t make sense.
I am guessing that the killing of the hoteliers – by someone other than Martin – was done to render them unavailable as witnesses to his innocence. Similarly, the death of Nancy Lanza guaranteed that she could not speak in defense of her son.
Point #4. Try the Cock Robin methodology. I use the nursery rhyme Who killed Cock Robin? to see who was officially present at the event. “I, said the spy with my little eye, I saw him die; I, said the fish with my little dish, I caught his blood,” — and so forth. The idea came to me from Chris Bollyn’s investigation of 9-11. He asks such questions as: “Who created the narrative? Who had custody of the evidence? Who was in charge of Security? Did insurance companies make a fuss? Did judges perform in a normal manner? If it turns out that answers to these questions are guarded secretively, one can (tentatively) smell malfeasance in the air. To repeat: I am clearly ineligible for the title “expert on Sandy Hook.” But I — and you — can do some work from an armchair.
Point #5. Dear Students, one can start with undisputed facts. The following are three undisputed facts of the December 14, 2012 “shooting” that, in and of themselves, raise eyebrows:
Fact One — There was a FEMA drill scheduled, and carried out in Newton CT on the previous day, December 13, and the day itself, December 14, 2012.
Fact Two — Later, the school was razed to the ground. So, too, was Nancy Lanza’s nice suburban house — for no known reason.
Fact Three — The killed-to-injured ratio was extremely high. Adam Lanza, who was no marksman, is said to have, within minutes, caused 24 people to die from his gun, while only two were hit and not killed. Even in the military, such a ratio of dead-to-wounded is unheard of. Let your eyebrows rise high.
Point #6. You can be a court watcher. The basis for my book, Inquest, about the December 2014 “Sydney siege,” was my attendance at the coroner’s hearings. The basis for my book, Boston’s Marathon Bombing, was the transcripts of the Tsarnaev trial (a shockingly corrupt trial). Sandy Hook has so far had two judicial cases — Pozner v Fetzer, in the Wisconsin court, and Soto v Remington, in several courts, principally Connecticut. In these two cases, the court’s decisions so far have been vividly unusual. Lenny Pozner sued Prof Jim Fetzer for publishing an accusation that Lenny provided a fake death certificate for his son Noah Pozner. In a defamation case, you get to argue that your allegation is true. Fetzer was not allowed to do so! (He has at least a ghost of a chance of getting that overturned by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.)
The District Court judge ruled against Fetzer by issuing a summary judgement in Pozner’s favor. (One can picture a metaphorical knife being held to the judge’s throat, can one not? Or maybe a real one.) The judge than called in a jury, but only to decide on the amount of damages. They awarded $450,000.
The second case was filed by parents led by Donna Soto, against Remington Arms, the manufacturer of Lanza’s alleged gun, the Bushmaster. Normally a gun maker is not liable for what eventuates, but the court ruled, that the Federal statute forbidding suit against gun manufacturers doesn’t hold for military-grade weapon. So, Remington lost and declared bankruptcy. Its insurance carriers have offered the plaintiffs just shy of $33 million.
Point #7. You can sniff around for a false flag. It is normal to interpret a false flag event as being done for the purpose of highlighting “the wrong enemy.” In Australia, it’s well accepted that the “Port Arthur’ was done to scare people and bring about a gun-control law. The new prime minister in 1996, John Howard, had anti-gun legislation in his pocket, ready to spring “when needed.”
You won’t be surprised to hear that the “conspiracy theorists” who started to doubt Martin Bryant’s guilt were the gun owners of Australia, especially farmers, who saw through the hoax. (By hoax I mean the falseness of attributing the gunwork to Bryant.)
In regard to Sandy Hook, it’s a bit strange that the gun clubs have not raised the issue of a hoax. Indeed, in the Soto v Remington case, in 2017, when the NSSF — National Shooting Sports Foundation — submitted an amicus curiae brief to emphasize the gun manufacturer’s legal immunity, they stated: “The shooting claimed the lives of twenty children and six adults.” It would have been better to add the word “allegedly” before the verb “claimed.” Judges rarely open up, sua sponte, a matter that neither side has raised.
Ask: Didn’t NSSF notice that if nobody died at Sandy Hook, there’s no case against the Bushmaster gun?
Point #8. You can calculate the overall direction in which the powerful is moving. I wonder: Are today’s gun lobbies dinki di? Infiltrating them would have been a high priority for One World authoritarians, no? My late friend Trish Fotheringham, a survivor of MK-Ultra mind control, told me that when her co-survivors were sent in to infiltrate Environmental groups, they did not even realize they were being used; it’s quite a system! And George Soros is heavily into putting an end to the Second Amendment….
Back in 2006, when I ran for Congress in New Hampshire, Second Amendment voters hugged me (I mean they smiled at me) when I averred that the right to bear arms includes shoulder-held missiles. (Not to be confused with candidate David Thistle’s claim that he can have an aircraft carrier moored at his pier!) But now that I think of it, in my more recent talks on the hustings, I don’t get bowled over by smiles or hugs.
Dear Students, look around at what various gun lobbies are doing these days. And peruse the last 100 headlines of a major newspaper to see how many are about shootings. Please try to imagine that any reported shooting may not have happened at all. I mean it may be newspaper fluff “for a purpose.” Or it may have been actually carried out — for a purpose!
Recall the declassified Northwoods Memo of 1962, signed by Joint Chiefs of Staff leader Jay Lemnitzer. He unabashedly discussed with his Pentagon colleagues a plan to create a make-believe air crash, in order to blame Cubans and start warring against Cuba. He was even planning to organize “fake funerals” for the “fake passengers” on the downed plane. (Oops, I mean the downed “plane.”)
I think it is perfectly reasonable to entertain the possibility that the 2012 headline-grabbing story of tiny tots being gunned down was a scheme to “take away our guns” and thus leave the citizens without protection against a tyrant. There is undeniably a direction in which the powerful are moving today, viz., total control. Such a thing was always on the minds of the Founding Fathers and they never hesitated to discuss it openly. So don’t be shy!
Point #9. Look on the bright side. If you were to demonstrate that the Sandy Hook deaths did not take place, this would be great news all around. Probably half the nation was traumatized or saddened by the announcement, just before Christmas 2012, that beautiful five-year-olds were struck down by a nutter. It would be pleasant news for the whole world that those kids, who would now be age 14 or older, are still enjoying life.
By the way, if this is so, they must be coming under some personal pressure about their possible fake identities. It was never their fault that a false story was circulated. They should feel free to step forward and ask for our help. We would welcome them.
Point #10. Look at sleuths who are pursuing hard data. In the Sandy Hook case, Wolfgang Halbig, a citizen whose former occupation was as a School Safety Expert, has been badgering the FOIA — Freedom of information Act — people “mercilessly.” They in turn have been ignoring him mercilessly. Frankly, I have a personal rule (ask me about General Boykin’s case): If FOIA is not forthcoming, tell them “Omnia praesumuntur, contra spoliatorem.”
Think: how can it be OK for FOIA people to turn down requests by such a respectable citizen as Halbig? You’d be well within your rights to assign Information Refused Points — IRPs — as weights against the validity of the official story, when weighing up your judgment as to the validity of the Sandy Hook event.
Please note that any citizen can call for official inquiries by a legislature, or petition the court for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. Neither the Federal Bankruptcy nor the Connecticut trial judge presiding over the settlement by Remington Arms and the nine Soto plaintiffs is obliged to rubber-stamp the $33 million payout. As for the court in Alabama, I have particular faith in them. My 2017 experience in that state knocked me over with goodwill.
With all the articles getting full of comments, not sure where to put this…
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Australia is moving into the high level of fascistic behavior we all feared…
The Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2020 (SLAID Bill) introduces three new powers for the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) to combat serious online crime. https://tinyurl.com/yf7hj8k7
The SLAID Bill aims to address gaps in the existing legislative framework.
It will allow the AFP and the ACIC to collect intelligence, conduct investigations, disrupt and prosecute serious criminal online activity.
The Bill introduces three new powers for the AFP and the ACIC:
*Data disruption warrants will allow the disruption of data through modification and deletion to frustrate the commission of serious offences, such as the distribution of child abuse material.
*Network activity warrants will allow the collection of intelligence on serious criminal activity carried out by criminal networks operating online.
*Account takeover warrants will allow the control of a person’s online account to gather evidence about criminal activity to further a criminal investigation.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Essentially the New Fascist State of Australia is taking control of its unarmed citizens ability to privately communicate with each other. The police will now be able to take over one’s social media account or email, etc. and change what ever is on there. Able to set people up for arrest, etc.
But I am SURE it is not in the plans here now is it? :-/
So much for critical race theory. This man puts it where it belongs….in the trash!! Love this guy!
https://youtu.be/7Gy2XScldxM?t=97
Sandy Hook is no more real than the Jussie Smollett attack. Except, Sandy Hoax has the deep state, the courts and the media pushing the lie. With the likes of Obama and Eric Holder two of the Sandy Hoax producers in the background making sure the giant fraud is not exposed.
Sandy Hook is one of the most well documented and investigated hoax false flags ever including a 404 page full color thoroughly footnoted book by Dr. James Fetzer which has been forced out of publication by the deep state. Something that should be considered is the $100 million in charity donations the Sandy Hoax gang has raked in. That is $100 million in felony charity fraud since it is based on a FEMA drill to promote gun control pretending to be a massacre. Also of note is the donation websites started going up two days before the event.
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=6119a5c55f9bed525db38b7f
This banned video about the pfizer vax is a bombshell. Its was made by a former pfizer viro scientist.
He tells us that the pfizer vax is totally untested on humans and its very dangerous.
This mass vaxing has never been done in all of human history…..and its causing thousands of deaths and injuries.
Attachment
The school and the Lanza home being torn down really shouldn’t be thought of as suspicious. The school demolition didn’t start until Oct 2013 and the Lanza home in May ’15. If it happened a few weeks after Ok, but not 10 months in one case and 2 1/2 years.
Dahmer’s apartment building, the Gacy’s house, the Columbine library were also torn down BTW.
The demo of the school is very suspicious. It destroyed ALL evidence that there was no gunfire at that school. Destruction of evidence is a felony crime all by itself.
Sandy Hook is suspicious, but one claim I don’t get is that they drilled holes in the school to make it look like bullet holes. To make it look as real as possible, they could have just shot up the school. They still had to take photos of the school, so using a gun would make look as real as possible.
Well, we have the photographic proof. The guys running the show were not rocket scientists. What I don’t get is why you don’t get it.
The photos you have were taken by the state police. It would make little sense to drill the holes in the walls of the school. They knew they would have to take photos, release a report with those photos. Just shoot up the school and make it look real.
The CT State Police were running the show behind the scene. While it might have made more sense to do it “your way” in retrospect, that is how it was done. I am baffled that you dispute such obvious proof of fakery. BAFFLED!
I read the book, but to show they were drill holes instead of bullet holes you don’t really offer evidence. you just show the photos and say they were drill holes. You have a photo that shows two men by the Room 10 window, saying they were drilling holes, but you can’t see either men holding a drill. Another photo shows a small pile of dust on the floor. If you fire a gun into ceramic tile, it would also likely leave a pile of dust underneath the hole.
In the 2nd ed. (or elsewhere) I corrected that caption. They were figuring out what to do. OBVIOUSLY they drilled holes to simulate bullet holes. They are all 90* to the panes and parallel to one another. You appear to know nothing about firearms and ballistics or it would leap out at you like a sore thumb. You are discrediting yourself with arguments so bad that they are embarrassing.
Some examples in the book of bullet holes in tiles would have been helpful or testing comparing a bullet hole in a tile and a drill hole. Otherwise it’s still just opinion. If you had the opportunity to present evidence in court, the state could likely just bring in experts who have the opinion that they look like bullet holes.
Enough of this rubbish. As a Series Commander in the Marine Cope with 15 DIs and 300 recruits under my command, which included marksmanship training, every weapon’s expert in the world would agree with me. You are a fraud as obvious as are the drilled holes in the aluminum window frames.
What makes that a drill hole and not a bullet hole?
Attachment
A shooter inside could not have fired shots on a perfect horizontal trajectory and 90* to the window panes. You are taking physically impossible shots seriously, which means you are either ignorant of the laws of ballistics or a fraud. You arguments, I think, speak for themselves. Enough is enough.
There is another issue with the book, that comes up many times. Those two exhibits are on page 142. they show the Meyer’s tag there, then another photo with the Meyer’s tag “removed”.
Those two photos were likely taken days apart. Exhibit 11 that shows no Meyer’s tag is on page 89 of the Walkley scene photos, Exhibit 10 is on page 738.
Attachment
And that you are complaining about such obscurities as though they “come up many times” further impugns you sincerity. The book has 13 contributors, including 6 current or retired Ph.D. professors, who concluded that the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students there, and that it was done to promote gun control. Few will be impressed by efforts to distract.
SOMETHING AMISS HERE FOR ME. ANYTHING MORE THEN A FEW WORDS DOES NOT POST???
Sent my post to you via email Jim. Might be in the spam as I cut the cord with all things Google. If you would post it I’d appreciate it.
Thanks
Sent my post to you via email Jim. Might be in spam as I cut the cord with all things Google. If you would post it I’d appreciate it.
Thanks
This comment is for Jim. Someone posted a movie on Telegram ( Surrogate ) and I just finished it. In the opening scene there is a man who is commenting as the movie intro is playing at the 2;15 mark. I am good with faces, but I am better with voices. That man is none other than then notorious Gene Rosen crisis actor. See for yourself.
Will, that would not surprise me. They are blatant. The same woman played Victoria Soto’s mother, Donna Soto, at Sandy Hook and also Susan Bro, the mother of Heather Heyer in Charlottesville. https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/Susan-Bro-Donna-Soto-.jpg
IDK… Is that 2:15 mark part of the Instagram or part of the movie? If it’s part of the Instagram, can you post the link? Sorry, I know zip about Instagram if that is not possible.
Will, it was from a movie that was sent on one of my telegram groups. If you are on telegram I can send it to you. I think. I would really like to get this out there. Other thing I could do is video it on my phone and send it that way
IDK…Curiosity now has me. If you can do that, it would be great (the video). I don’t do Telegram or any of that stuff. What is the exact name of the movie and the year? Thank you.
OK, IDK…I found it…ity’s called Surrogates from 2009 and that sure as hell looks like Rosen playing a doctor this time.
Attachment
It sure as heck does look like him and his voice, that’s the main thing. Thanks for looking in to it. It’s always nice to have some of the self-gaslighting casted aside. I just never know sometimes. Have to go with my gut.
Of course, he’s not in the credits…they cover their arses. BUT, the glasses are identical.
He plays for a brief moment, Dr. Gregory Stock. Here’s a better screen shot:
Attachment
The BOOK on Sandy Hook reveals all!
Attachment
I am trying to watch Greg Hunter’s latest Clif High interview. Keeps seizing up. Before the last stoppage, I was riveted by High’s data on the vaxxed dying en masse and the first responders dying or being debilitated and the system being unable to deal with the dead and dying and 10% of the general population being involved in burying the dead. Early 2021 is when he is expecting the vaxxrd deaths to peak. But he is also talking about the mental debilitation he is already seeing as he goes about his errands. That the food shortage has already started in western Washington after a major food distributor shut down because of cover found by the PCR test. I am not sure I can go about my day if I see anymore of this interview.
https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2021/08/greg-hunter-clif-high-biden-desperate-as-vax-narrative-falls-apart-must-video-3593450.html
Initially, I had the same problem. Click Rumble in the bottom right-hand corner. When that channel comes up, refresh it. After that, I had no problems with buffering. ….and I have the worst Internet connection being in a rural area. I hope that helps.
For EJ Doyle:
Tried 4 times to post, only thing was showing up was one liners?? And one double posted.
Not sure just how much hands on you do for putting the posts up. If you would post the below comment for me I would appreciate it.
Thanks
– – – – – – – Pls Post What Is Below- – – – – – – – –
Good arm-chairing Mary, thanks. It is so very frustrating. We know there were so many quetions about Sandy Hook…Parking lot, guy in the woods, no wifi for years, district storage of supplies in class rooms, no blood or report of the agency that cleans hazardous material up, etc.
Just like 9/11, Boston and other false flags the facts get bowled over for the “feelings.”
We were also “told” that the controllers have some obligation or need to forewarn the victims.
As we all recall, over the past decade a lot of information “slipped” out to the public about guillotine train cars being made in Washington state, “wild” fires in Washington State that somehow knew how to stop at the Canadian border, no government resistance to 100+ days/nights of “antifa” rioting, plans to use Walmarts as FEMA detention centers, the UN Wildlife Project, Gerogia Guide Stones, UN Agenda 21&2030, the predictive “virus” quotes from Fauci, Bill and Melinda Gates, the 10 year old Operation Lockstep, and more all play into the script.
Comparable to how 9/11 had a lot of reasons why it was done…Insurance $$, stolen gold, war justification, PATRIOT act, etc. so it seems the “CV-1 plandemic” is a multi phased assault on humanity.
The most frustrating thing is to understand just how brilliant the sociopathic/psychotic controllers are as they have the classic divide and conquer going so strong now with masks, vaccines, racists, patriots, celebrity child porn, transexuals, sold out school unions vs parents, and a capitol under military guard with fences and a run a way communist/socialist democratic/RINO presence tearing up anything left of our constitution.
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
“I think it would be a good idea.”
-Mahatma Gandhi (1869 – 1948)
when asked what he thought of Western civilization
Both of these photos are Ryan Lanza. One is normal and one is ridiculously photoshopped.
Mary says the photos are ”Adam” which is an untruth.
Attachment
Mary Maxwell trudges on and on with her ”Points”, never once pausing to ask if ”Adam Lanza” was a real person.
The most obvious question is to produce even ONE photo of the two ”brothers” in one photo.
I have a brother, our mother took HUNDREDS of photos with both of us in one photo.
In several of her points she lets slip that the Courts are fair and square. Mary, I have a little secret, they’re not.
Attachment
I know Sandy Hook is still a fresh wound to you Jim with the Pozer’s litigation. They love their “in you face” names don’t they ?… Po-zer ! You have to marvel at the nerve of filing cases based on a mountainous fraud. I guess I’m really focused on current events and we know the Sandy Hook charade inside and out thanks to you and others. Without you, James Tracy and Wolf and many others… we would be in the dark. That said, I’m really concerned what’s happening with Tennessee and test running their concentration camp concept in the volunteer state where there are heavily armed serious ass kicking bubbas. Their reaction to the CDC’s plan will be pivotal. Also, I just saw some footage from the Montana “wildfires”. It shows the directed energy signature to the nines. Houses turned to light gray dust with cars blast furnace toasted and partially melted next to untouched trees. How can people not freak out about this? Of course there are always some actual woods on fire nearby to cover the crime just like places the world over. I talked to someone in Henderson , Colorado a few days ago and people are refusing to come to work because the smoke is so bad.
Clif High’s latest predictive linguistics on why Trump had to support the roll out of the death injections. He claims it short circuited their plan to lockdown the world for years. I think it makes sense as horrible as it sounds. My best friend is dying from his “vaccines” from healthy as a racing stallion to cancer of the lungs, liver and pancreas. His last transmission to me was totally out there, excoriating me for being part of the Sturgis Rally. He thinks we are all going to die of variants and we deserve it ! What did you’ll think of Clf High’s latest ?
https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2021/08/new-clif-high-the-return-of-trump-2523004.html
TN looks like a pilot study. If they can get away with COVID CAMPS there, they can get away with them anywhere. His explanation for Trump’s moves makes more sense than any other explanation. I am inclined to think he’s got it right!
geobodley@aol.com
11:09 AM (4 minutes ago)
to me
JNFE TV
JNFE TV
ABBOTT AND COSTELLO’S ‘WHO’S ON FIRST’ ……updated version.
Bud: ‘You can’t come in here!’
Lou: ‘Why not?’
Bud: ‘Well because you’re unvaccinated.’
Lou: ‘But I’m not sick.’
Bud: ‘It doesn’t matter.’
Lou: ‘Well, why does that guy get to go in?’
Bud: ‘Because he’s vaccinated.’
Lou: ‘But he’s sick!’
Bud: ‘It’s alright. Everyone in here is vaccinated.’
Lou: ‘Wait a minute. Are you saying everyone in there is vaccinated?’
Bud: ‘Yes.’
Lou: ‘So then why can’t I go in there if everyone is vaccinated?’
Bud: ‘Because you’ll make them sick.’
Lou: ‘How will I make them sick if I’m NOT sick and they’re vaccinated.’
Bud: ‘Because you’re unvaccinated.’
Lou: ‘But they’re vaccinated.’
Bud: ‘But they can still get sick.’
Lou: ‘So what the heck does the vaccine do?’
Bud: ‘It vaccinates.’
Lou: ‘So vaccinated people can’t spread covid?’
Bud: ‘Oh no. They can spread covid just as easily as an unvaccinated person.’
Lou: ‘I don’t even know what I’m saying anymore. Look. I’m not sick.
Bud: ‘Ok.’ Lou: ‘And the guy you let in IS sick.’
Bud: ‘That’s right.’
Lou: ‘And everybody in there can still get sick even though they’re vaccinated.’
Bud: ‘Certainly.’ Lou: ‘So why can’t I go in again?’
Bud: ‘Because you’re unvaccinated.’
Lou: ‘I’m not asking who’s vaccinated or not!’
Bud: ‘I’m just telling you how it is.’
Lou: ‘Never mind. I’ll just put on my mask.’
Bud: ‘That’s fine.’
Lou: ‘Now I can go in?’
Bud: ‘Absolutely not?’
Lou: ‘But I have a mask!’
Bud: ‘Doesn’t matter.’
Lou: ‘I was able to come in here yesterday with a mask.’
Bud: ‘I know.’
Lou: So why can’t I come in here today with a mask? ….If you say ‘because I’m unvaccinated’ again, I’ll break your arm.’
Bud: ‘Take it easy buddy.’
Lou: ‘So the mask is no good anymore.’
Bud: ‘No, it’s still good.’
Lou: ‘But I can’t come in?’
Bud: ‘Correct.’
Lou: ‘Why not?’
Bud: ‘Because you’re unvaccinated.’
Lou: ‘But the mask prevents the germs from getting out.’
Bud: ‘Yes, but people can still catch your germs.’
Lou: ‘But they’re all vaccinated.’
Bud: ‘Yes, but they can still get sick.’
Lou: ‘But I’m not sick!!’
Bud: ‘You can still get them sick.’
Lou: ‘So then masks don’t work!’
Bud: ‘Masks work quite well.’
Lou: ‘So how in the heck can I get vaccinated people sick if I’m not sick and masks work?’
Bud: ‘Third base.’
I don’t think the camps will fly in South Dakota. Every day I become more convinced this place is the heart and soul of traditional values. And every day I become more convinced Colorado will be one of the leaders of the CDC’s plan with Governor pole-up-his-ASS. He just sent me another fear mongering Covid update. His plan is to vaccinate every child he can find and deliver masks by the truckload to every school. I don’t think anyone will stop him, most conservatives there remain silent. I showed the CDC’s plan to a born here 60 year old. He seemed completely unconcerned that it will fly here and is also incredibly awake about what happened on election day.
Here is just a small piece of Pole-up-his ASS letter to me
“A new school year is quickly approaching and it’s critical that our students, teachers, and staff have a safe and enjoyable year in the classroom. Every day, more and more students and adults are getting vaccinated, but until the vaccine is available to everyone 12 and younger, we must continue to be vigilant and protect our youngest Coloradans from this virus,” said Governor Polis. “Vaccines for those who are eligible, along with mask-wearing, regular testing, stay home when sick, effective quarantines and ventilation are key ways to slow and stop the spread of COVID. If you are eligible to get the vaccine, I encourage you not to wait another day, get the lifesaving, free vaccine as soon as you can.”
Following is a pdf of Bill Lee’s EO 83 upon which Adams is basing the title of this article:
RED ALERT: Covid internment camps announced in America; Tennessee governor signs EO authorizing National Guard to carry out covid medical kidnappings.
I have read this several times (it’s just 9 pages) and here is the only paragraph I could find that relates to involuntary incarceration:
14. Telephone assessments for involuntary commitment cases are permitted. The
provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 33-4-108, are hereby suspended
to the extent necessary to allow the issuance of a certificate of need under Tennessee
Code Annotated, Section 33-6-404, for the emergency involuntary commitment of
a person with a MENTAL ILLNESS or SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE based upon
a telephone assessment of such person by a mandatory pre-screening agent
designated pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated, Sections 33-6-104 and 33-6-
427, if the following conditions are met:
a. The mandatory pre-screening agent is not reasonably able to conduct an
evaluation in-person or via readily available telehealth services; and
b. The mandatory pre-screening agent determines in the agent’s professional
judgment that conducting the assessment via telephone with the person is
clinically appropriate.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Now, this is not to say they could deem all those unvaxxed with a mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, but that potential (and obviously what would have to be false assessment in many cases) is certainly not reflected in the title or the content of the article. The title and the words in the article itself imply that anyone can be involuntarily incarcerated. SO, I see that particular description as at the least, mis-information and at the most dis-information and/or fear mongering.
Kidnapping the mentally ill or seriously disturbed is most certainly not acceptable. I just see it as a bit of an over-reaction on Mike’s part.
Presently, we need more FACTS and fewer assumptions.
Remember, Americans are armed and will protect themselves and their families from any forced incarceration….unlike Australia where this is apparently now underway.
https://publications.tnsosfiles.com/pub/execorders/exec-orders-lee83.pdf
I might also mention my comment in the above regard was deleted from Jim’s BitChute channel while many other comments attacking Jim remained. Jim is not doing this censorship as far as I have been told. I sent an email to BitChute which is a UK company and I have yet to receive an answer as to WHY ALL my comments are deleted on Jim’s channel…many of which were defending Jim from a troll who posts as THESILENTONE15 on just about every one of his videos.