There’s Something Very Strange About The Obama Family That Will Never See The Light Of Day From The Mainstream Media – What Do YOU Think About These Bizarre Oddities?

By Alan Barton 

[Editor’s note: For more on Michael/Michelle, go to False Flags & Conspiracies Conference 2020 and down load (as many as you like but especially) “Deception Galore: Faking Hate Crimes, Candidates & a Pandemic” and brace yourself for what you are going to discover there.] 

 

The last time we met we covered a few items regarding the Obama’s and that column brought up a number of comments that I decided required a follow-up to clarify a bit further.  Although the main thrust of that one was that it is Barry Obama that is actually running the White House as his third term as president, it is the question of who – or what actually – is Michelle as we left that topic in a bit of a mess.  As I tend to do often, let’s start off with some definitions.  Merriam-Webster defines ‘Ambiguous’ as “doubtful or uncertain especially from obscurity or indistinctness” but even more importantly for today’s discussion as “capable of being understood in two or more possible senses or ways”.   If you possibly remember some of the comments in that earlier column we mentioned an idea I had that I have not seen discussed or even ventured elsewhere about Michelle, or Michael if you prefer, and the first definition I just gave should hint at where we are going in this one.

Although the Urban Dictionary defines ‘Sexually Ambiguous’ as “that they (person/s) are not displaying their sexual orientation. Meaning, it’s difficult for others to say with certainty what the sexual orientation of that person is.”   Although that is a place to start, we must first note that sexual orientation is not what we are defining here, but what actual sex is the person in question.  The Free Dictionary in their Medical section is a bit closer when they define ‘Ambiguous Sexuality’ as “ Psychology Acquired sexual discordance in which an individual’s phenotype and genotype are ♂ or ♀, but his/her ‘psychotype’ is ♀–or ♂  and then babbles on about something to do with ‘transexuality’.   Still not quite what we are looking for although it seems to be coming into play with this discussion, so let’s try another phrasing.

The term ‘Intersex’ does not quite fit either, but seems to be closer and Britannica lists ‘Intersex’ as “an organism having physical characteristics intermediate between a true male and a true female of its species” and although that is closer, the PBS show Nova has it listed as “Physical gender is not always just a matter of XX or XY, girl or boy. In approximately one out of every 100 births, seemingly tiny errors occur during the various stages of fetal sex differentiation, causing a baby’s body to develop abnormally. Problems in the formation of chromosomes, gonads, or external genitals can lead to a range of intersex conditions.”  They then go on to list a number of variations that are prevalent such as Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), and Testosterone Biosynthetic Defects, and Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS), and syndromes like Turner Syndrome which we will not go into today; and Klinefelter Syndrome that we cover a bit further on. 

Going back to Ambiguous we find the term ‘Ambiguous Genitalia’ appears to be what they are actually speaking about and the Mayo Clinic has an entry that they describe it as “rare condition in which an infant’s external genitals don’t appear to be clearly either male or female. In a baby with ambiguous genitalia, the genitals may be incompletely developed or the baby may have characteristics of both sexes. The external sex organs may not match the internal sex organs or genetic sex.”  Ahh, now we are getting to the main point; they then go on to describe situations where there are XX and XY chromosomes and possible problems that may cause.  They also mention that one of the risk factors is infertility, just keep that in mind.  The Cleveland Clinic says that the newer, more correct term is supposed to be ‘Atypical Genitalia’ and mention that “Atypical genitalia occurs in about 1 out of every 1,000 to 4,500 births” and although it is not common, it is also not all that uncommon either.

In one essay on IvyPanda one writer mentions that “Ambiguous sex has become a major social and ethical issue for entire societies and professional practices therein. The concept of ambiguous sex stems from the relation of sex and gender, whereby, it is argued that one’s sexuality is not a representation of his or her gender (Diamond & Beh, 2012).   In other words, a person with female genitals does not necessarily have to be female in gender; rather she can be socialized to be male in gender. To shed more light on the sex ambiguity, Diamond (2002) defines the term sex as the anatomical structure of the genitals, and gender as the adopted or imposed psychological and social condition”.  That brings up the questions involved in choosing a gender if the absolute sex is unknown or ambiguous, which seems to be the problem in a few of the gender confused people we see, but can only be a small part of them according to the estimated numbers.  The correct course would then seem to necessarily include a DNA test to see what the actual genetic makeup is to really help determine the real physical sex vs. the assumed gender.  In all of this the psychological effect can be massive and must be considered closely.

Health Research Funding notes a few statistics and a couple of those are “The percentage of the population that is affected in some way by ambiguous genitalia: 1.7%” and “Over 90% of intersex children are assigned to the female gender” with the very serious numbers that “About 70% of intersex males and 85% of intersex females have seen a counselor or psychiatrist during the previous 5 years”.  Remember that this is a very personal identity problem and also that most intersex people are only slightly out of normal and can be regarded as normal or close enough to it; the numbers that are truly ambiguous are actually a very tiny portion of them, but the psychological impact can be extremely devastating to them.  Most “trannies” are actually just sexual deviants that would better be described as perverted homosexuals, not actual gender or sexually ambiguous people.  An interesting quote from Wikipedia on this subject under the category of ‘Hermaphrodite’ shines a noteworthy light on it when they said “the term hermaphrodite applied to humans has fallen out of favor since there have been no identified cases of a human reproducing as both male and female, with some biologists saying hermaphroditism does not occur in humans. Intersex activists have preferred the word intersex, since the word hermaphrodite is considered to be stigmatizing, as well as “scientifically specious and clinically problematic.”  “There are no hermaphroditic species among mammals or birds.”

Because of limitations of decorum or decency and the partially unknown audience reading this I will not post photos of these conditions but the reader can look them up for themselves if they have the inclination to do so.  But I will add in pictures of the primary subject of this column below.

Barry, Bill Gates and Mike Robinson

Michael LaVaughn Robinson was born January 17th 1964 and Michelle LaVaughn Robinson was also born on that same day in Chicago, Illinois and Michelle’s mother was Marion Shields Robinson and her farther was Frazer Robinson III.  By some odd coincidence that is the same names of Michael’s parents; the father being, as a former staff of Michelle’s reportedly said, “He was the second son born to Fraser Robinson III, a well known cocaine dealer and union thug for Crime Lord/Mayor Richard J. Daley, and Marian Shields Robinson, a transient street prostitute who was diagnosed with the HIV virus in 1998. He was a popular high school athlete and in 1982, he accepted a scholarship to play middle linebacker for the Oregon State Beavers.

After finishing a respectable rookie season with 88 tackles and 7.5 sacks, he suddenly dropped out of the school. Fellow teammates observed that Robinson could regularly be heard lamenting over how he is a “woman trapped inside a man’s body”, and on January 13th, 1983, he underwent sex reassignment surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineTo hide the shame of his new identity, Michael left Oregon State to attend Princeton University under his new legal name, “Michelle Robinson”. Years later, he met Barry Obama Jr. a Kenyan immigrant who later became aware of “Michelle’s” true identity. They subsequently married and adopted two children.

Michelle/Michael’s Parents

This has been common knowledge for a long time now and I do not want to belabor the point; rather, I would like to suggest a slight adjustment to that narrative.  Building off of the introductory paragraphs, I would like to suggest what seems to me to be obvious but not to others, that when born Mike/Michelle was of uncertain, or in other words, ambiguous sexual identity being some of one and some of another.  Perhaps enough to resemble being male or female, but ambiguous and not distinct; a rare occurrence but does happen.  I came to this idea because he/she seems to have traded off and on shifting from one to another as a child and even into high school and college with photographs showing both sexual identities even concurrently.  This may have been, as a child, because his/her parents were not really sure and the medical system hadn’t decided for them either.  There has been a very concerted effort to hide this ambiguity and shifting identity from the public with the resulting female one prevailing for political purposes.  It is very difficult to find photos of a young male Mike while even young female Michelle photos are also not common; a distinct obfuscation of the history and propagandized to eliminate the male aspect of his;/her identity.  As a child that identity would be certain if it were actually one or the other, but as there are two distinct identities I must conclude that it is an ambiguous, ‘intersex’ individual that has finally come to the conclusion it would rather live outwardly as a female than a male but inwardly as a homosexual male.  I mentioned the ‘Klinefelter Syndrome’ above, and that is when a boy is born with an extra X chromosome.  According to WebMD “Men with Klinefelter usually don’t know they have it until they run into problems trying to have a child. There’s no cure, but it can be treated.”  Larger breasts are one indication (not to be confused with Soy caused enlargement from female hormones in soy) and infertility is another major one.  Many articles ask if he was born male or female and many more state unequivocally that he was born male.  I cannot say that because it is difficult to say which birth certificate is genuine and which is falsified like Obama’s supposed Hawaiian birth certificate most assuredly was faked.

Big Mike, the great Line Backer

And as Michelle, near the same time period

XXY Chromosomes website says “XXY is male. It is not a gender issue. It is not an intersex issue” which is very interesting, so I cannot say which he/she is, but he/she is neither a straight male nor female and my judgment is some combination of the two or else he/she would have been raised as one over the other while in reality he/she was raised at one time one and then the other and back and forth seemingly at random.  This disparaging condition is possibly the source of Mike’s very real emotional problems and perhaps just ambiguous sex or perhaps some other condition related to these.  Whatever, it has led to a serious psychological disorder that may explain some of its irrational anti-Americanism and hatred of the White race even though it is a mulatto of some degree biologically just as its husband, Barry Obama is.   Infertility as all XXY and Intersex people are is proven by the articles such as the BBC one that said in her book Memoirs that they “used in vitro fertilisation to conceive both children, Malia and Sasha”.

So where would the real Michael LaVaughn Robinson be today?  I can find no proof that he even exists after the early 1990’s with most sources saying that he never existed even though we KNOW he did because of his high school and college records as well as friends that knew he was a transsexual and of questionable masculinity even though his stature and muscular build was effective in his football activities.  XXY is male, ambiguous sex can be one or the other primarily and intersex can also be either one.  As I am not a medical doctor, especially in the fields that would cover this problem, I can only give an opinion based on my research and I conclude that it really does not matter which he was specifically born as. He was listed as female for so much of his younger years with male off and on until in about 1983 (some say January 13th) he supposedly got a sex change operation.  Perhaps enlarged breasts, but his ‘junk’ is still in operation and has been filmed many times flopping around while dancing and such.  Again for the sake of those easily offended I will not post those movies in this column and they can be easily found using simple searches, but not likely using Google or other NWO controlled search engines.

During the 2008 presidential election cycle Michelle’s doctor Rafael Espinanzo said (in spite of many threats of lawsuits) “I Know what I saw. Michelle Obama is not a woman who used to be a manMichelle Obama is just a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill. On the campaign trail, no medical staff was allowed to go near her other than to take vitals if she got sick, which she never did. I know what I know because I walked in on her…err…him…while he was taking a leak standing up in a bathroom in Trenton. They paid me millions for my silence but after seeing what they did to this country I just can’t keep quiet. Let them sue me.”  The website references to the original are being held under lock and key, they are not accessible to the public.  There are a number of theories on just who the two girls are that cover for the Obama’s kids, some saying in vitro from Barry’s seed implanted into some rented womb or another or that they were rented for the publicity or purchased on the black market from child traffickers and many other theories, and I have no idea what the correct story is. I just know one thing: they are NOT the natural offspring of a couple of queers, which would be impossible.

I suppose I am on the official hit list for what I just wrote about the Kenyan’s preferred candidate for 2024, but be that as it may; that is what the facts prove beyond any shadow of doubt. 

God Bless

Please follow and like us:

46 thoughts on “There’s Something Very Strange About The Obama Family That Will Never See The Light Of Day From The Mainstream Media – What Do YOU Think About These Bizarre Oddities?”

  1. Pingback: Big Mike – Elite Gender Inversion
  2. Jim Fetzer writes… ” Your gullibility astounds me.”
    Your blog here is one of the best I have ever encountered. Every Post is spot on, I even have several of your books.
    But what you accept as ”proof” on Michelle is off the mark and very sketchy.
    I enjoyed your reply to my WH photo that she “can tuck in her nuts”….that was priceless. Why would she for a private WH photo?

    I believe those steel pennies were 1943.

    moderated
    1. Ask someone you trust to look at my evidence (including “Deception Galore”) and assess who has the stronger argument? If Michelle were a woman, the package, the leak standing up, the marriage to a gay guy, the absence of breasts early on, the MEN’S HAIR CLUB membership, Joan River’s reports, “borrowing the kids” from her physician, her size compared with Mike Tyson, on the one hand, and Mike Bloomberg, on the other, would make no sense. Not just improbable, but virtually impossible. However, if she’s actually a man, it all falls into place. I don’t think I’ve encountered anyone else reviewing this evidence who continued in a state of denial. You say I get everything else right; so why would I be wrong about this? What am I missing re you?

      moderated
      1. Once again, Jim….may you prevail in your case today……and I am sure all here wish you the same. Keep us posted, please.

      2. Thanks, Will. Lasted about 35-40 minutes. He denied both of my motions, which was the outcome I wanted (as odd as that sounds). There was nothing remarkable about it. Took my briefing notes as exhibits + images of my blog and how it was being abused by Pozner. Said 1 in a million that SCOTUS will hear my case. More to come.

      3. Jim: I’ve shown your evidence to several trusted people. They all say you’re mistaken by a long shot.
        Your virtual obsession with *objects* under her clothing is bizarre. Michelle is a female with extra DNA…that alone makes havoc with her life. Her baggy pants do not show a flopping penis and nuts….IMO.

        In her bio book, she writes that she gave birth to the 2 daughters by insemination. WHY is she lying about this??? Her bio book is filled with lies. She has created much confusion herself about her real life. I already told you I can’t stand her! She’s a liar and a thief. Both Barack and Michelle are disbarred. Imagine that, TWO disbarred Harvard attorneys in the WH at the same time.!!!

        Your personal attacks on me are distasteful. IE: ”slow learning curve, needs eye exam, etc. etc”. Not nice Jim
        and very unprofessional.

        File: Michelle in her WH days…what a hoochie!

        Attachment

      4. Thanks, Don. I guarantee you Michelle is a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill. I have no idea why you can’t see it. She has an appendage that women do not have. She had no breasts as an adult; now she has breasts. She faked the kids. She married a gay guy. What is there for you not to understand? I agree that my frustration has led to those comments because I just don’t get it. You are a smart guy. I am not wrong about this. Here’s one more I am sure you are going to discount as well. Then I say, “Let’s just agree to disagree!” Thanks for being so patient with me. https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Michelle-the-price-of-looking-good-2-copy-2-1-1.jpg

      5. Apologies for stepping a bit on “agree to disagree”…but I would like to add one more aspect that seems to not have gotten enough play. Although I may be making an assumption, but I’ll go ahead and say most, if not all here will agree that Obama is gay.
        So, why would a gay man marry a real woman? As simple as that inquiry sounds, I think it warrants examination.
        Jim, thanks for the court update and I am sure you have a strategy as to why the judge denying the motion is what you wanted. I look forward to more.

      6. I find it most peculiar that, when I observed (as others have before me) that Michelle has “a package” that most women do not have, you made a snide remark about my having a fixation with her anatomy! But how ridiculous is that? This is a question about her anatomy and whether she is a biological male or a biological female. And Will reiterates a point I have also made: if she’s not really a man, then what is she doing married to a guy who is gay? And–personally–how can you continue to insist she’s really a woman when we have proof like this? And how many times has he called her “Michael” in the past? : https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Barack-with-Michael-.jpg

      7. Two people are named in the File photo. Neither of them even remotely resemble the attached names.
        I’ve seen this pic before and its been identified as a hoax.

        Attachment

      8. You are really something, Don. This photo “has been identified as a hoax” and you believe that? It could be said of any inconvenient photogrqphic proof. You are bewildering to me. I believe you are intelligent and sincere. The evidence, as I see it, is conclusive. I don’t know what else to say. When you take the totality of evidence I have presented here and elsewhere, there’s no room for doubt about it. But I respect your right to believe whatever you want to believe. I am at a loss as to what else I can say. One of us is profoundly wrong–and I do not believe that would be me.

  3. What the hell…in for a dime, in for a buck. Michelle Obama Registered To Vote As a Man In 1994 According To Illinois State Board of Elections…..Interesting read with documentary proof. How do we account for this? Once again, from a TOR search.

    https://roserambles.org/2022/08/04/michelle-obama-registered-to-vote-as-a-man-in-1994-according-to-illinois-state-board-of-elections-august-5-2022/

    https://cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/239286_5_.jpg.webp

    moderated
  4. The Headline double photos are two different people. That’s my analysis and I’ll stick with it.
    Michelle always has been a female with extra chromosomes and DNA. That accounts for her massive male-like body. It also makes her infertile. That’s why when she and Barack were married, they had to adopt. The two girls are the offspring of her doctor and husband and look just like them. The parents of these two girls always accompanied the Obamas on their Christmas trips to Hawaii. This extended family always went to Hawaii at Christmas so that they did not have to participate in the usual Christian rituals of Christmas which they loathed.
    File:….The ”daughters” real parents…..notice that they clearly resemble them.

    Attachment

    moderated
    1. While there is some evidence that Michelle Obama may be transsexual without reassigned sex surgery, I agree with you that the two photos do not prove anything. Also, the notion that a Michael Robinson played football in 1982 or neighboring years for the Oregon State Beavers is not supported by a review of the rosters for those years: https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/oregon-state/1982-roster.html. The problem, if it exists, is Michelle Obama’s problem. If she is transsexual and is covering up, that sends a poor message to transsexuals trying to gain acceptance in American society. But if she later reveals herself to be born male, then that would confirm all the “conspiracy” theories floating about for years.

      moderated
      1. Bill, have you watched “Deception Galore” from the False Flags & Conspiracies 2020 conference? I lay out the evidence, including a photo of Michael Lavon Robinson playing football at Oregon State (#44), who had a good tackling record. I have to tell you the proof that “she” is a he is overwhelming. Take a look and get back with your rebuttals of the evidence I present here: https://falseflagconspiracies2020.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/9-FFC2020-Jim-Fetzer-Deception-Galore-Hate-Crimes-and-More.mp4

      2. William, to save some time, the part about Michael starts around 16 minutes in that presentation.

      3. Would it not be interesting to run a search on Michael Livon Robinson to determine if that “person” continued or did his history suddenly come to an end?

      4. William, I agree with you and others that a Michael Robinson never played football at a college in Oregon. The File photo shows Michelle during her college student years. There is no real evidence that Michelle traipsed around as a male with a face beard and a shaving problem. But she does have a DNA abnormality which gives rise to her broad shoulders and other so-called male attributes. Her Pastor, Jeremiah Wright in Chicago knew about this and hooked her up with Barack who has his own problems. He thought that they would make a good marriage.

        Attachment

      5. “Michelle” is a male with breast implants and a huge shaving bill. Has Don bothered to watch the evidence I present? I am baffled that, after all the research I have done on this and published for the benefit of the public, posts like this are appearing here. Don. have you watched my video? And, if not, why not? What do you dispute? Please be specific.

      6. Jim….Your contributor, Danny Cirrus who has been on the Raw Deal quite frequently might do well to run a background check on Michael Livon Robinson. I went as far as I could without having to pay. I found someone around 57-58 years old from the Oregon area where he played ball. Interestingly enough, Livon as a middle name is not uncommon. If that person has disappeared, it may put at least some doubt to rest.

      7. Yes Jim I have watched your video several times [ the brief part about Michelle]. I see some faked photos and read some fantasy, wishful comments about Michelle. There’s a lot of fraud concerning Michelle that I don’t buy into. In fact none of it is convincing. Michelle herself is partly responsible for some of this. Her various biographies are loaded with her untruths and misdirection. For some reason she seems unable and unwilling to tell the truth about who she really is. Michelle even says she conceived via a load of sperm from Barack and was delivered of her babies by her female doctor. The facts appear to be that the babies delivered were the Doctor’s. The girls even resemble this female doctor and HER husband…who is a financial advisor for Barack. Plus, there are no photos of a pregnant Michelle.

        Attachment

      8. Well, I don’t know which photos you think are faked. She OBVIOUSLY has a package most women do not have. The photo with Barack and (what looks to me like a young Bill Gate) shows no breasts of the kind we find on women. The the physicians report of walking in on her taking a leak “standing up” leaves no doubt about it. On Ellen DeGeneres, she was dancing and you could see her male member swinging along. I am baffled by your reticence about this. Baffled! And, yes, the kids were borrowed and the older looks just like her father and the younger like her mother.

      9. Jim, I don’t think Joan Rivers “confession” should be dismissed too lightly. “…we all know” pretty much puts the icing on that cake. Rivers slipped and it probably cost her her life. She felt she was not divulging much since “we all know”…..but that’s the “in” crowd. I doubt the average voting American knew. It was a very spontaneous remark and therefore, likely absolutely true.

        https://youtu.be/5WUYGPhUjyE?t=20

      10. We have to see the humor in this “Michael” debate. Our country is literally disintegrating under our feet and we’re debating if “Michael” is a transgender, a genetic anomaly or a Chimera. It’s quite hilarious.

      11. I see no male ”package” and I see no ”member” swinging-along concerning Michelle. What I do read/see is that people have an over-active imagination when watching Michelle. The story of Michelle standing up to pee is just that…a story with no proof.

        Jim: You’ll just have to be baffled.

        William: Michelle is not about to admit she’s male. Why? Because she’s not male and never has been.

        File: Michelle inside WH….no male package visible!

        Attachment

      12. Hey Jim….not a single comment from you on any of the pics I posted….including my most recent of Michelle [no package] with their dog in the WH.

        Yeah I’ve seen that pic of Michelle a hundred times…I have no idea what that tiny ”thing” is in her blue pants.

      13. Isn’t that interesting: you can’t account for that “thing” in her pants! And you can’t account for her missing breasts. And you can’t account for their faking having kids. And you can’t account for the swinging thing in her pants on the Ellen Show. And you can’t account for Joan River’s remarks. I think you would be well advised to cease defending an indefensible position. All explainable on the alternative hypothesis.

      14. Oh Jim, that bearded person in your pic looks nothing like Michelle, not even slightly. I’ve seen it many times in the past.
        Your excellent blog on hoaxes and frauds is sullied and defiled horribly by this discussion about Michelle.

      15. Embarrassing. Let’s just agree to disagree. I am dumbfounded. I think you have lost your way. It’s easy to fake photos. The ones that are revealing are the ones that count, like having no breasts in the photo with Barack and the (young Bill Gates) guy. I just don’t get you on this.

      16. Hey Jim, why do you continue to refuse to comment on my File pic that shows no package? I have a feeling that you fear I’m totally correct about Michelle. What’s that about an eye exam?

        That pic you posted of ”someone” with a beard that pretends to be Michelle is LOL. That person does not even resemble Michelle in the slightest.

        So be it. Agree to disagree.

        Attachment

      17. Surely you jest! Two photos of her face made up like a woman is convincing to you? And that she can tuck in her nuts is enough to fool you? I am taken aback. Do you also believe RuPaul is a woman? The whole point is to fake being a woman, where your photos are nice illustrations. It’s a case of looking for disconfirming (or falsifying) evidence rather than for confirmations. There are billions of confirming instances of pennies made out of copper. So do you believe all pennies are made out of copper?

        https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Joan-Rivers-outing-them-both-.jpg

        The most obvious objection to your fanciful tale (of “genetic abnormalities”) is that Barack Obama is gay. It was well-known before Joan Rivers outed them both. He had a torrid affair with Rahm Emmanuel in Chicago familiar to one and all–and when he went to Washington, he took him with him as his Chief of Staff. What would a gay man be doing with a woman for a wife? Give that some thought.

        https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Michelles-doctor-goes-on-record.jpg

        A doctor assigned to her on a campaign event walked in on her taking a leak standing up. He was paid for his silence but could take it no longer and observed that Michelle Obama is not a man who had a sex change operation but a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill. And that photo you claim to have “studied closely” IS Michelle letting her beard grow because her husband is no longer President.

        https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Michelle-Obama-is-a-Man-video.jpg

        I am hardly the first to make the point, but I do it because I cannot abide phonies, liars, fakes, and thieves. They are all of the above. Check out the video at beforeitsnews.com a link for which is provided there. Just trim the eyebrows, make up the face, and you have a match!

        https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Michelle-Obama-not-pregnant-.jpg

        Moreover, obviously, two men cannot produce an offspring. As others have observed, there are no photographs of Michelle when she was pregnant, because, as a man, she cannot be come pregnant. I have no idea when these simple biological facts are going to sink in. But there’s more.

        https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Where-the-kids-came-from-.jpg

        The kids were “borrowed” from a physician who attended her, where the older girl looks just like her father and the younger just like her mother. And the physical comparisons of Michelle with men are equally stunning. Here she is with Mike Tyson, the heavyweight champion of the world. Yet her back and shoulder dimensions may even exceed his!

        https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Michelle-with-Mike-Tyson.jpg

        And her she sits beside Mike Bloomberg, then Mayor of New York City. We call this “Big Mike with Little Mike”. I can’t wait to hear what you have to say but it must tell you that, given the amount of research that has been devoted to this in the past–where I myself took two years of research before publishing about it–you must have a very slow learning curve.

        https://jameshfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Big-Mike-with-Little-Mike-.jpg

      18. The last type of people that I consider reliable sources are celebrities, especially ones like Joan Rivers.
        Her comment [ circa 2014] about Palestinians is diabolical….”They deserve to be dead”.

        Attachment

      19. Don, are you telling me that, after Will and I have laid out more and more evidence, you STILL think Michelle is a woman? Say it ain’t so, Joe. I am more than baffled. I am dumbfounded. Joan Rivers knew what she was talking about. She was a veritable fountain of truth about celebrities and scandals. What stuns me is the Joan Rivers had better comprehension of the facts of the matter than someone who posts on my blog! Someone may be “unreliable” regarding Michelle Obama, but that would not be her. Your gullibility astounds me.

      20. Hey Jim, I can tell you one thing about Michelle….I can’t stand her and I don’t like anything about her.
        She was a total disgrace as First Lady and did everything she could to destroy the historic decoration of the White House. Her legacy is one of pure ugliness.

        File: top photo is how she changed a WH dining room. Her attitude towards the WH was cold blooded hate.

        Attachment

  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics)
    Humans
    Chimerism has been documented in humans in several instances.

    The Dutch sprinter Foekje Dillema was expelled from the 1950 national team after she refused a mandatory sex test in July 1950; later investigations revealed a Y-chromosome in her body cells, and the analysis showed that she was probably a 46,XX/46,XY mosaic female.[23]
    In 1953, a human chimera was reported in the British Medical Journal. A woman was found to have blood containing two different blood types. Apparently this resulted from her twin brother’s cells living in her body.[24] A 1996 study found that such blood group chimerism is not rare.[25]
    Another report of a human chimera was published in 1998, where a male human had some partially developed female organs due to chimerism. He had been conceived by in-vitro fertilization.[4]
    In 2002, Lydia Fairchild was denied public assistance in Washington state when DNA evidence appeared to show that she was not the mother of her children. A lawyer for the prosecution heard of a human chimera in New England, Karen Keegan, and suggested the possibility to the defense, who were able to show that Fairchild, too, was a chimera with two sets of DNA, and that one of those sets could have been the mother of the children.[26]
    In 2002, an article in the New England Journal of Medicine describes a woman in whom tetragametic chimerism was unexpectedly identified after undergoing preparations for kidney transplant that required the patient and her immediate family to undergo histocompatibility testing, the result of which suggested that she was not the biological mother of two of her three children.[27]
    In 2009, singer Taylor Muhl discovered that what was always thought to be a large birthmark on her torso was actually caused by chimerism.
    In 2017, a human-pig chimera was reported to have been created; the chimera was also reported to have 0.001% human cells, with the balance being pig.[28][29][30]
    In 2021, a human-monkey chimera was created as a joint project between the Salk Institute in the USA and Kunming University in China and published in the journal, Cell.[31] This involved injecting human stem cells into monkey embryos. The embryos were only allowed to grow for a few days, but the study demonstrated that some of these embryos still had human stem cells surviving at the end of the experiments. Because humans are more closely related to monkeys than other animals, it means there is more chance of the chimeric embryos surviving for longer periods so that organs can develop. The project has opened up possibilities into organ transplantation as well as ethical concerns particularly concerning human brain development in primates.[32]
    Hermaphrodites
    Question book-new.svg
    This section relies largely or entirely upon a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. (June 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
    A hypothetical scenario in which it could be possible for a human to self-fertilize. If a human chimera is formed from a male and female zygote fusing into a single embryo, giving an individual functional gonadal tissue of both types, such a self-fertilization is feasible. Indeed, it is known to occur in non-human species where hermaphroditic animals are common. However, no such case of functional self-fertilization has ever been documented in humans.[33] Some biologists have even said hermaphroditism does not occur in mammals,[34][35][36][37][38] especially in humans.[39][40][41][42]
    Bone marrow recipients
    Several cases of unusual chimera phenomena have been reported in bone marrow recipients.
    In 2019, the blood and seminal fluid of a man in Reno, Nevada (who had undergone a vasectomy), exhibited only the genetic content of his bone marrow donor. Swabs from his lips, cheek and tongue showed mixed DNA content.[43]
    The DNA content of semen from an assault case in 2004 matched that of a man who had been in prison at the time of the assault, but who had been a bone marrow donor for his brother, who was later determined to have committed the crime.[43][44][45]
    In 2008, a man was killed in a traffic accident that occurred in Seoul, South Korea. In order to identify him, his DNA was analyzed. Results revealed that the DNA of his blood, along with some of his organs, appeared to show that he was female. It was later determined that he had received a bone marrow transplant from his daughter.[43]
    Chimera identification
    Chimerism is so rare that there have only been 100 confirmed cases in humans.[46] However, this may be due to the fact that humans might not be aware that they have this condition to begin with. There are usually no signs or symptoms for chimerism other than a few physical symptoms such as hyper-pigmentation, hypo-pigmentation, or possessing two different colored eyes. However, these signs do not necessarily mean an individual is a chimera and should only be seen as possible symptoms. Again, forensic investigation or curiosity over a failed maternity/paternity DNA test usually leads to the accidental discovery of this condition. By simply undergoing a DNA test, which usually consists of either a swift cheek swab or a blood test, the discovery of the once unknown second genome is made, therefore identifying that individual as a chimera.[47]

    moderated
  6. For eight years Obama gave the middle finger to the office of POTUS. There is not one drop of either white and black blood within him….he’s 100% Indonesian and he’s a Muslim. He punked the US then and now.

    Attachment

    moderated
  7. moderated
  8. Well, that leaves little doubt as to what we are dealing with in regard to Obama and his first “lady”. … (I sort of dislike the term, but I find it appropriate under this circumstance)…just a couple of faggots. Nice to know what represented this country for 8 years. Thanks, Joan Rivers, for your candidness.
    Now, do not be surprised when Michelle/Michael oppose Trump come 2024. Crazily enough, It’s their only hope. BUT, it will fail. Perverts and extremists will do what they do….self immolate. That’s what evil does. And We the People have had enough.

    moderated
      1. And sadly enough, what will really wrinkle your wand is that many Americans will not care. They’ll fail to weigh the deception of those eight years and see “its” candidacy through “woke” eyes. Hey, look, if you wish to identify as a lesbian fish person riding a unicorn and playing Chopin’s polonaise on an electric kazoo, that’s your prerogative….but please do not attempt to represent the rest of us.

Leave a Reply