Is Mark Zuckerberg Liable for Trillions in Civil Damages, and Should He Be Criminally Charged?

Alex Jones’s website Infowars.com reportedly gets 22 million visitors a month. Based on this traffic, Alex Jones is a bona fide member of the press, and of course, a media commentator and talk show host. Alex may be an alternative media publisher, but with his reach and influence, it needs to be established that he and Infowars.com are a legitimate media outlet. It appears that there has been an orchestrated campaign by the media to cancel a competitor, Alex Jones and Infowars. Alex Jones has been banned from social media platforms and targeted by the cancel culture. Is this an antitrust violation, are we dealing with a media monopoly that needs to be broken up?

The legal system has not taken up that question. Instead, Alex Jones was recently skewered in a made for television show trial, first in Texas, then in Connecticut, which according to legal experts, violated multiple norms of rules of evidence and legal procedures. If there is any justice left, then these trials will get reversed at the higher courts. The most recent disgrace came when his trial in Connecticut resulted in a billion dollars in damages in a defamation lawsuit.

What was Alex Jones’s crime?

Some years back Jones had reported on the Sandy Hook shooting. In doing so, as a commentator, he discussed an internet rumor that those involved were crises actors and the shooting was essentially a hoax. Jones later denounced this theory and apologized.

The courts decided that Jones is required to indemnify, which means to make whole, the families of the victims. Somehow, courts in two states determined that his statements and commentary caused losses to the parents of the children, in the millions, and apparently, a billion dollars. That’s right, someone making statements in public that hurts the feelings of grieving parents and family members, damaged the families to the tune of a billion dollars. That is a lot of indemnification. Almost seems like someone is trying to make a point.

Do the grieving parents of those that died in Iraq, a war promoted under false claims of weapons of mass destruction, have a claim against government controlled media monopolies that lied the United States into war? Never mind….

Let’s focus on a more contemporary situation. Media monopolies and big tech monopolies received a billion dollars from the federal government to promote Covid shots, and apparently censor information about the risks involved with these shots, thereby denying informed consent.

Does this violate federal law?

U.S. Code 21 Section 50.23 and 50.24 require informed consent even for emergency use authorized experimental treatments. Informed consent is a concept embedded in western medicine and was Codified in the Nuremberg Code, as well as the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, which the United State considers itself bound. There are also many state laws that require informed consent.

There may also be issues regarding fraud and willful harm. The Pfizer clinical trial conducted from December 1, 2020 to Feb 28, 2021 showed approximately a thousand side effects, 1223 deaths, 42,000 adverse cases, and 158,000 adverse incidents. This information was made available to the government in April of 2021, before the wide spread roll out of the Covid gene therapy shots. The clinical trial data became public when a court ruled in favor of a Canadian Physician’s Group for Transparency. This information became public in November of 2021.

Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook have routinely censored information regarding potential harms from Covid gene therapy shots, prior to, and after the Pfizer clinical trials were made public, in November of 2021. Facebook enjoys immunity from civil liability because it is considered a platform, not a publisher. However, once Facebook engaged in censorship of medical information and potential harms arising from experimental gene therapy shots, it then began acting like a publisher, and should be subject to the same laws. Furthermore, it begins to look like fraud when a product that clearly causes harm is referred to as safe and effective. Pfizer’s clinical trials showed that there were substantial risks to taking these experimental gene therapy shots.

The cumulative data since then has built a foundational case that these shots are undoubtedly dangerous and pose risk of harm, including death. The Florida Department of Health has advised against children under 18 getting these shots as the risks outweigh the harm. More recently, the Florida Department of Health is advising against men under 40 receiving these shots as there is an 84% increase in the serious heart condition called myocarditis. These are tiny steps in the right direction and should be applauded, but it is long past the time to ban the jab. It seems ludicrous to deny that these products can cause harm, including death.

If Alex Jones is liable for a billion dollars in damages for hurting the feelings of grieving family members, then what is Mark Zuckerberg’s civil liability for denying informed consent and censoring medical information about known potential risks to an experimental treatment? People took these shots because they did not know about potential risks censored by Facebook. This was a denial of informed consent. Facebook censored content and suspended accounts of people that provided information about the potential harm from these shots. Facebook also promoted the shots even though the Pfizer data was made available.

How much should be paid to those that are permanently disabled because they were denied access to information about potential risks from these Covid Gene therapy shots? How much should be paid to victims and families that got cancer, heart disease, autoimmune disorders, neurological disorders? How much should be paid out for each miscarriage? What about the families of those that died from these and other conditions, including (SADS) Sudden Adult Death syndrome?

Zuckerberg and Facebook

In addition to civil damages to indemnify victims and their families, should there be criminal charges? Is this mass murder? Is it fraud? Was it intentional or not? Did Zuckerberg know about the published Pfizer clinical data? Did he know about the numerous studies and reports of the harm caused by these shots? Does Zuckerberg or Facebook have a financial interest or financial ties to pharmaceutical companies? Did Zuckerberg or Facebook collaborate with foreign entities in this campaign of denying informed consent? Have multinational corporations been weaponized against the United States? Are Covid shots a biological warfare weapon against the United States and the world population?

Zuckerberg and Facebook are not the only ones that need to be scrutinized. Government agencies and employees, public officials, employers, universities, hospital systems, pharmacies, big tech companies, media companies and all employees, and others that censored information regarding these experimental shots, or did not provide informed consent, need to be held accountable, civilly and criminally. All those that received money from the Biden administration to promote these shots need to be questioned. Of course, the pharmaceutical companies and their executives need to be held accountable too.

A great place to start would be Zuckerberg and Facebook. I am calling out every state attorney general in all fifty states as well as every local state attorney’s office. Why are you not asking these questions?

I’m not an attorney and don’t know what crimes Zuckerberg could be charged with, or if he could be charged at all. Although, in my mind, I think he should be held accountable and I believe there is a causal relationship between Facebook censorship of medical information about potential risks arising from Covid gene therapy shots, and disabilities and deaths. Remember, this censorship continued after Pfizer’s clinical data was made public via a court order.

A key difference between Alex Jones and Mark Zuckerberg is that Alex Jones was exercising his First Amendment Rights, Mark Zuckerberg was trampling on the First Amendment Rights of others. In my mind, this caused tremendous harm.

Imagine if Zuckerberg were held to the same standard as Alex Jones. There would be trillions in damages and criminal charges. I think Alex Jones is innocent. Mark Zuckerberg, I’m not so sure.