James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., Pro Se Defendant, Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Recuse Dane County Circuit Court Judge Frank Remington

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., Pro Se Defendant, Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Recuse Dane County Circuit Court Judge Frank Remington       DEFENDANT’S REPLY NOW COMES James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., Pro Se Defendant, with a Reply to the Response from Plaintiff’s attorneys filed on July 24, 2024, to Dr. Fetzer’s Motion to Recuse Judge Frank Remington Pursuant to Wis. Stats. 757.19(2)(g) filed July 9, 2024. Plaintiff’s Response observes (correctly) that ruling against a party per se does not require a circuit court to recuse.…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., Motion to Recuse Judge Frank Remington Pursuant to Wis. Stats. 757.19(2)(g)

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Not to suggest a comedy of errors, but my Motion to Open Judgment Pursuant to Extrinsic Fraud and Fraud upon the Court (17 June 2024) prompted the Circuit Court Judge presiding over my case, The Honorable Frank Remington, to deny the motion without soliciting a response from the Plaintiff and my reply, which was a violation of the Wisconsin Rules of Judicial Procedure. When I protested by filing a Request for Relief from Judgment or Order (20 June 2024), he did it again! This was such a…