Jonas Alexis and Jim Fetzer: From Darwin to Deontology, Part III: Final Remarks on the Fetzer–Alexis Debate

Jonas Alexis and Jim Fetzer   This marks the final phase of our exchange, and I will address as many questions as possible that relate to the topic at hand. First, I would like to express my appreciation again for the opportunity to engage in this discussion with Fetzer. That said, I am somewhat surprised by several points of mischaracterization in his most recent response, perhaps unintentional. For instance, he writes: “Rather inappropriately, however, he claims that I beg the question by presuming that Roe v. Wade was correctly ruled (though now…

Jonas Alexis and Jim Fetzer, From Darwin to Deontology, Part II: Abortion, Social Engineering, and the Politics of Life and Death

Jonas E. Alexis and Jim Fetzer   Note to the reader: As previously noted, I (JEA) will begin by presenting my argument, which serves as a response to Fetzer’s points from our initial exchange. Fetzer’s reply will appear below. Part III will constitute the final stage of our discussion and will follow the same format. Should any questions remain unresolved, I have informed Fetzer that we can address them in the comment section. After the third phase, Kevin MacDonald has agreed to join the conversation, and we will continue from that…