Alex Jones Calls Out ‘Murder of Due Process’ at Sandy Hook Show Trial

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer

Alex Jones’ appears to be getting the same treatment I received in the lawsuit brought against me by the man who calls himself “Leonard Pozner”, whom I am convinced is a legal fiction played by Reuben Vabner, who came to Madison and testified under oath. Everything about my trial was wrong, as I explain in detail (below). Now they are taking my blog on Thursday at 5 PM/CT to make sure that I am unable to contribute to explaining what’s going on here and how the law has been weaponized to censor and abuse those who speak out about “false flags” (or staged) events, where we have had a spate of them of late with Buffalo, Uvalde, and (most recently) Highland Park. Download the LAW ENFORCEMENT “FALSE FLAG / STAGED EVENT CHECKLIST I have published with Brian Davidson, P.I., and you will see the massive effort that is being exerted to deceive and mislead the American people, especially to give up their guns! DON’T DO IT!

Alex Jones, Murder of Due Process at Sandy Hook Show Trial (26 July 2022)

My petition is on the docket of the Supreme Court. While I originally believed it was a 1st and 2nd Amendment case, the Summary Judgment protocols in Wisconsin allowed the Judge to decide whether or not my facts were “reasonable” and exclude them if in his subjective opinion they were not. As you will see from my Petition–which you can download to your own desktop here–the Court of Appeals (4th District) and the WI Supreme Court agreed.

In other states, such as TX, however, the case against me would have been tossed or else sent to a jury for determination of the disputed facts. But in WI, the Court could in effect determine the facts regardless of my evidence. It turns out this is a national problem and I am teeing up the case for SCOTUS to make summary judgment protocols uniform throughout the nation. I believe they are going to do just that and set things right.

Brian Davidson and Danny Cirrus, The CT State Police at Sandy Hook (23 March 2022)

When I published Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control (2015; 2nd ed., 2016), with thirteen contributors (including six Ph.D. professors), amazon.com banned the book less than a month later (even though it had sold nearly 500 copies). I released it for free as a PDF. Mike Adams wrote about it, “The Most Dangerous Mind in America” on False Flags and Extreme Censorship.

In 2018, I was sued for defamation in Madison, WI, over an uncertified death certificate in the book. The Court would not allow me to present my proof that nobody had died on the (absurd) ground that it had nothing to do with the truth or accuracy of the death certificate, which alleged the decedent–Noah Pozner–died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012 of “multiple gunshot wounds”.

Check out Jim Fetzer, What Happened at Sandy Hook (5 December 2020)

I introduced reports from two forensic document examiners, both of whom concluded that it was fake, but the Court simply set them aside as “someone else’s opinion”. Ignoring my standing as a journalist, the Court ignored the disputed fact of the authenticity of the document and found me guilty of defamation, even though there was no finding of negligence. I was guilty of defamation without fault.

The trial for damages was captured perfectly by Kevin Barrett, “The Legal Lynching of a Truth-Seeker: Jim Fetzer’s Stalinist-Style Show Trial”. When I appealed the abuse of Summary Judgment, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals District IV made (what Ron Avery characterizes as) gross errors. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has denied my Petition for Review without a word of explanation the same day Remington settles for $73,000,000 without establishing that anyone died at Sandy Hook. The fake shooting is being used to undermine our right to keep and bear arms, as it was planned to do.

False Flags: From 9/11 to Sandy Hook and Beyond (20 February 2016)

As a former Marine Corps officer, I am profoundly obligated to carry this case to the US Supreme Court because, whether I am right or wrong, I was denied the right to present a defense. I have been saddled with $1.1m in liens as a result of a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit against Public Participation) to punish those who speak out and expose fraud and corruption by the government. I am doing what I can to protect your rights.

If this case stands, then we can be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. I am doing this for all of us but I need your help! I have the law and the evidence on my side. What I don’t have is the money. I am doing this for the sake of the nation. But my attorneys expect to be paid. Lend a hand if you can. Thanks!

Please follow and like us:
error
fb-share-icon
Tweet
fb-share-icon
views: 784

Related Posts

April 16, 2024 14

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., FAKE NEWS: “The Truth vs. Alex Jones”

April 16, 2024 3

Joachim Hagopian, IRAN ATTACKS ISRAEL: MIDDLE EAST AND WORLD TEETER ON BRINK OF A KINETIC WWIII

April 13, 2024 1

Haaretz: “Israel Has Been Defeated – A Total Defeat”

24 thoughts on “Alex Jones Calls Out ‘Murder of Due Process’ at Sandy Hook Show Trial”

  2. Not really, Don….it’s just that you always seem to find a way to divert from the question asked. My question was, “Would not that oath you took call for you to do everything you can to reverse the course we are on instead of endlessly degrading that very country under which you took that oath?”
    If one posts on a blog, to not expect criticism or question is quite strange. Personally I am open to any criticism or challenge. In actuality, I look forward to it as a way to grow and defend whatever my position may be on a specific topic. I certainly don’t single you out, but you might admit you post quite a bit and the numbers alone create an opportunity as opposed to someone who might post once a week or so. No one on the blog should be above criticism including Dr. Fetzer (whom I have challenged a few times)….is that not how we grow intellectually?

    moderated

    1. @ Will2…I don’t degrade the USA, it degrades itself. I only report the facts, if someone can’t face facts, that’s their problem. Many on this blog have a rather Pollyanna attitude about reality. Anyone reading this blog can instantly see that there is one person who you consistently target…..me. Carry on, everyone should have a hobby. Again, please read my comments more carefully. You accuse me of saying something and then cut out half of the sentence. Of course this distorts the full content of my comment. Two words can define this behavior… and insincerity & hypocrisy.

      moderated

      2. Don, life is too short. I vow to never reply to or criticize any of your comments. if you wish, you can do the same for mine. It’s much easier that way.

  4. Nick Sandmann’s media libel lawsuits dismissed by federal judge

    The judge called the hit pieces from various newspapers “protected opinion”. Isn’t that interesting. One would think Jim’s exposure of the fake death certificate was “protected opinion”, eh? But that only applies to those opinions that support the government narrative…apparently. Yeah, protecting the DEEP EFFIN STATE!

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/nick-sandmann-media-libel-lawsuits-dismissed-federal-judge

    moderated

  7. They said to use another emai, the charity one. Evidently she is a philanthropist too. That email is Marguerite_Olivier@hancockprospecting.com.au

    Dear Gina Rinehart via  Marguerite_Olivier@hancockprospecting.com.au. I agree with you that CO2 is not causing global warming too. James Fetzer supports such things too, I support many of his ideas, not all. His website is jamesfetzer.org. I think they are taking it from him Thursday Central American  time. I think he is being unfairly sued for about  one million dollars, which he cannot pay, and shouldn’t have to. He is taking the case to a higher court, the court that sued him would not let him present his evidence. It is about a school shooting called “Sandy Hook”.  There were multiple versions of a death certificate and they are suing him because he published one, they say it is slander.He has a webpage and email is at his university,  https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/index.html
    jfetzer@d.umn.edu
     Yours faithfully, Bill ….

    moderated

  9. I have sent another request to Gina Rinehart for her to help Jim. My details at the bottom are removed. Perhaps Jim and others can send her more requests.
    “Dear Gina Rinehart,gina_rinehart@hancockprospecting.com.au . I agree with you that CO2 is not causing global warming too. James Fetzer supports such things too, I support many of his ideas, not all. His website is jamesfetzer.org. I think they are taking it from him Thursday Central American  time. I think he is being unfairly sued for about  one million dollars, which he cannot pay, and shouldn’t have to. He is taking the case to a higher court, the court that sued him would not let him present his evidence. It is about a school shooting called “Sandy Hook”.  There were multiple versions of a death certificate and they are suing him because he published one, they say it is slander.He has a webpage and email is at his university,  https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/index.html
    jfetzer@d.umn.edu
     Yours faithfully, Bill …………..

    moderated

  10. Every week I hear on the News how terrible was the Sandy Hook massacre. Until that changes and the truth is revealed in Congress and the media, nothing will change. The US is one of the most corrupt nations on earth. We are living a nightmare in 2022 of gargantuan size.
    Many people are being jackhammered into the ground with the gavel of corrupt judges and their courts of law.
    Some people on this blog continuously shout “this must stop…now”….a lot of good that does.

    moderated

    1. Don, at least it’s a call to action other than incessantly calling the US the most corrupt nation on earth. What good does that do?

      moderated

      1. These are my exact words….”The US is one of the most corrupt nations on earth.”……read my words more carefully.
        Most people refuse to accept the reality of the situation we face.

      2. Always a diversion, Don. I have never denied the US is corrupt. Who in their right mind would. My dispute is with that constant repetition and negativity without one hint at a solution or hope. You have said you served in two branches of the service. Would not that oath you took call for you to do everything you can to reverse the course we are on instead of endlessly degrading that very country under which you took that oath?

      3. Again, Will2, you fail to carefully read my comments. Here are my exact hopeful words, “Every week I hear on the News how terrible was the Sandy Hook massacre. Until that changes and the truth is revealed in Congress and the media, nothing will change. ” Something wrong with that?

        Your constant criticism of me is tiring and serves no purpose.

      4. Not really, Don….it’s just that you always seem to find a way to divert from the question asked. My question was, “Would not that oath you took call for you to do everything you can to reverse the course we are on instead of endlessly degrading that very country under which you took that oath?”
        If one posts on a blog, to not expect criticism or question is quite strange. Personally I am open to any criticism or challenge. In actuality, I look forward to it as a way to grow and defend whatever my position may be on a specific topic. I certainly don’t single you out, but you might admit you post quite a bit and the numbers alone create an opportunity as opposed to someone who might post once a week or so. No one on the blog should be above criticism including Dr. Fetzer (whom I have challenged a few times)….is that not how we grow intellectually?

      5. Well Will2, I did answer your question and you ignored it. Oh, BTW, I can answer your question any way I want to. I can even ignore a question. I do believe the 1st Amendment is still in force…..maybe.
        Your incessant lectures to me are amusing. Its a constant litany of don’t do this, don’t do that or the opposite. I guess I just don’t measure up to your lofty standards of perfect behavior. I’ll admit it, I’m not perfect.

        Attachment

  13. They are taking your website. They can’t take your name. Your name plus .org is the website. You just need a hew website. You were right about Sandy Hook and many things. I wrote to a billionair in Australia for her to help, but no response. She spoke out about the climate change scam. Her name is Gina Rinehart (Lancock’s daughter) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_Rinehart. She paid no notice of me, but she may listen to you Jim Fetzer, if you ask her?
    All the best Jim.

    moderated

Leave a Reply