Mary Maxwell, America’s Downfall: the Sandy Hook Hoax Has Lasted Ten Years This Week

MaryMaxwell [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 13-Dec-2022 14:35:32

[Editor’s note: The photo I added  (above) is of “Noah Pozner” celebrating his 8th birthday. (Count the candles!) Pretty good for a boy who died at Sandy Hook at the age of 6!]

Ten years ago on December 14, 2012, the FBI, or some other part of the US government, played a trick on the American people. They put out a story that 20 children were shot by 20-year-old Adam Lanza. No kid actually got shot, so that is a happy fact, but it’s not a happy fact that folks can be so easily misled.

Recently we have learned that the US government, over many years, regularly tricked the American people in regard to wars and issues of health. Some honest Americans have recorded the details of these deceitful projects, yet the general public seems unwilling to respond to the exposes. In fact the exposers are considered to be bad people!

In this article I’ll refer to some of the evidence that the Sandy Hook massacre is fictional. But what we need more than proving that, is a study of what has happened to the human mind. Maybe it is some combination of the following:

1. Emotionally, one finds it so hard to accept that one’s nation does bad things, that this truth has to be kept out of consciousness.

2. The media has such control of culture that anything they print is taken to be “reality” and nothing can overcome that.

3. The CIA’s invention of the pejorative term “conspiracy theorist” has worked wonders. As soon as a truth-teller comes forward, he can be called by that term, and this lets others think of him as having mental problems. “He’s peculiar. Ignore him.”

4. Everybody is super-busy these days, and it’s burdensome to have to take in the remarks being made by the truth-tellers. It’s easier to accept the lies.

5. People are afraid of being punished if they side with the truth-tellers. The’ve heard many stories of dissidents getting bumped off or losing their wealth. “Best to keep my head down.”

6. The intellectual capacity of the average American is much lower than it used to be. People are not stressed by conflicting reports of events. It all seems fine, “no problem.”

The Downfall

The title of this article claims that now that 10 years have passed without folks waking up and protesting the lies about Sandy Hook, we may as well declare that America has fallen.

I would judge America’s international reputation to be very bad (it was once superb), and local patriotic pride to be at a low ebb.

The love of truth, as an end in itself, is never spoken of anymore. It used to be a main ideal both in religious/moral terms and as a social trait. People talked about being willing to die for truth. Nowadays it would be embarrassing to say that.

Science will have to shut down. Science’s accurate, truthful observation of phenomena is what made it succeed. Why not say the temperature at which water freezes is 41 instead of 32. Who cares?

We also won’t be able to teach school children how to reason, how to make logical deductions, or how to examine a problem without catering to one’s emotions. Emotions will rule the roost.

The ideal of impartiality in a courtroom will have to disappear. The new style is to say whatever you feel like saying, and perjuring won’t even garner a reprimand. Even within a formal statement you can make conflicting remarks and that won’t cause the statement to be ruled out.

Without a firm social value of truth, you can’t place reliance on a business contract or even a personal relationship, as promises need to be remembered and kept. Promises can be abandoned if it’s now acceptable to lie — you can rewrite history.

Presumably if you tell your 8-year-old daughter today that George Washington said “Father, I cannot tell a lie — I chopped down the cherry tree,” she may ask if you’ve gone off your meds.

People who do insist on truth are now punishable, openly as well as secretly. Their writings, deemed mis-informational or anti-social, can be wiped from the record and the writer can be found guilty of sedition, terrorism, or practically anything.

Sandy Hook Must Take the Blame

Of course it’s going too far for me to say that ten years’ worth of a Sandy Hook hoax are tantamount to the downfall of America. Many things have brought about our downfall. But I wouldn’t have thought a visibly false story could be supported, or at least tolerated by the inhabitants of a city in contemporary America, for a full decade.

Not that there aren’t some Sandy Hook truthtellers. I’ll mention three. One who got killed. One who got fired. One who has been under (I’m guessing) a sort of personal house arrest.

The one who got killed is William Brandon Shanley. He sued the media, and Rupert Murdoch, for spreading the lie about a massacre. Not only was he angry, he was a resident of Connecticut.

The one who got fired is James Tracy a professor of media studies in Florida. The case against him, which was First Amendment defensible, was twisted to reflect some other behavior. (Like smoking in the campus’ no-smoking zone, or whatever.)

Both of those cases left the public with the impression that you can’t mount a legal case based on truth.

The third case is that of a local. I will leave her name out. Initials: MC. She has stated in writing that when she realized the massacre was a hoax she went to speak to the bishop. That seems like a very reasonable and proper thing for a Catholic to do, but he called the police on her!

The number of truthtellers is not as small as three, but when there are millions supporting the lie, even 50 truthtellers would have a hard time speaking. Folks instinctively go with the flow.

Some Absurdities Claimed in the Sandy Hook Hoax

I have written a 212-page book entitled “Unreality: Sandy Hook Messes Minds.” I won’t attempt to summarize it here. Instead, I will pick out 6 absurdities in the story, as my way of asking “How could listeners not develop a skeptical feeling when they heard these items?”

1. The gunman, for whom there is no photographic or audio evidence, is said to have killed his mom in her bed, on the morning of the school massacre. No enmity between son and mother had ever been noticed by anyone. This killing is ridiculous — you should majorly doubt it.

2. Although it’s never admitted that Homeland Security was running a drill at Sandy Hook on December 14, 2012, the town bosses think it’s no problem that an electronic sign, visible at the scene of the crime, says “Everyone must sign in.” That sign is proof of Homeland Security involvement, isn’t it?

3. There is a photo of kids in the parking lot (age maybe 8), forming a conga line. They are required to keep eyes closed so they won’t see anything, when there is nothing to see in the parking lot anyway. Amazingly, there are no adults panicking in that photo — on such a day!

4. There is an affidavit signed by policewoman Rachael van Ness, that her job that day included preventing parents from grabbing their children as they escaped from the school. Can you imagine anything as absurd as that? Officer van Ness must have been ordered to tell that lie.

5. Some families got their GoFundMe page up and running on the very day of their tragic loss. Come on, we know a bereaved parent would never do that, or condone someone else doing it.

6. In the official story, the parents never viewed the body of their deceased 6-year-old. Identification was done by photograph (whatever that means). We know that even a maternal monkey clings to her infant’s body after it dies. No one should have accepted this absurd lie.

Giveaways in the Court Cases

No one has yet been sued or prosecuted directly for the crime of purveying the Sandy Hook hoax as a real event. But various actions have occurred in courtrooms, where blatant deviation from the judicial norm is quite telling. I’ll give 6 examples.

1. James Tracy, as mentioned, was prevented from using the standard defense against his firing, namely, that he has a right to free speech. (Clearly he was fired because he blogged critically about Sandy Hook. And why is it wrong to raise criticism? If the massacre was real there would be no need to discipline Prof Tracy.)

2. A few of the parents successfully sued the homeowners’ insurance company of Mom Lanza’s house, in regard to it being the storage space for Adam’s guns. Why did not all 20 families join?

3. A woman hospitalized for mental illness in Florida, Lucy Richards, was convicted of harassing the family of deceased child Noah Pozner. She was sent to jail for 6 months. Did she really haunt the Pozners? Does a mentally ill person really read a conspiracy theory and feel so righteous that she must punish the liars? Didn’t the federal judge have doubts?

4. Despite being maliciously arrested in Florida, truthteller Wolfgang Halbig has been unable to get fulfillment of the many Freedom of Information requests he has sent to the government of Connecticut, which he could use to defend himself. He cannot pry out of them an answer to such a neutral question as: Had the Sandy Hook school building been condemned for asbestos?

5. Truthteller Jim Fetzer, a retired professor of philosophy no less, was sued by Leonard Pozner in a defamation case, for having, in effect, called Dad Pozner a liar by saying the death certificate he presented for Son Noah is inauthentic. If the defaming remark you make is true, the plaintiff cannot win. So Prof Fetzer must be given a chance to show that his “insult” to Dad is in fact true — the death certificate is inauthentic. Two forensic experts agreed in affidavits. The Wisconsin judge, however, did not allow Discovery and made a summary judgement: Fetzer to pay $450,000 for defaming Pozner. The state appeals court then declined to rule.

6. When Donna Soto and eight others sued Bushmaster Gun, manufactured by Remington Arms, Remington went into bankruptcy before even trying to get the case thrown out. Instead, it could easily have argued that Adam Lanza carried four guns that day, why blame Bushmaster? Their lawyer also kowtowed to the state’s declaring the children’s school records confidential.

The End of Our Judicial System

These six instances of funny business in court show that there’s a huge problem. I believe each of the judges knew that he or she was supposed to follow the party line. Trying to make justice happen was not even a consideration. They all had to “get around it” somehow.

So why have courts? The old USSR had show trials like this, so the Soviet public could be educated as to what will happen to them if they cause trouble. I believe if you submitted my six sample cases to a panel of law-trained Americans who weren’t under any pressure to come up with the “desired” result, they would have ruled as follows:

1. Tracy is owed back pay and reinstatement, as the firing was a breach of First Amendment rights.

2. The parents of all 20 children could be invited to join the suit against homeowners insurance. (By the way, 6 adults were also allegedly killed at the massacre; their families were equally entitled to any damages.)

3. It is unlikely that Lucy Richards committed the crime of harassing the Pozner family at all. The judge should have required good proof. (Note: the story of her arrest may itself be a hoax.)

4. Halbig should be provided with the means of obtaining information in accordance with the FOI Act of Connecticut. (The criminal case against him was dropped however, so “Discovery” is not available now.)

5. There is no question that the district judge should have let Fetzer defend himself, and the Wisconsin appeals court should have listened to Fetzer’s plea. (He also tried the US Supreme Court, unavailingly. How’s that for a shock? And you won’t see it in the media.)

6. The agreement by Defendant Remington/Bushmaster, to let the children’s birth, death, and school records be sealed, is a perfect giveaway of collusion between the Parties. Remington had no stake in closing those records — rather the opposite.

What This Downfall Portends

I ask you to face the gravity of the situation. There is no justice system in America now. The persons who hold judicial-related jobs are acting in malfeasance, if not in plain old crime.

Unless you do something about this Sandy Hook matter — which is very simple and indeed contains the happy news that no gunman entered that school — you are lost.

We could call a grand jury to investigate each of the judges referred to above. And maybe that Catholic bishop, too. Judges and bishops hold a special sacred role in society and if we find them doing wrong, we’d be crazy to accept it as part of “corruption.”

It is not part of corruption or personal selfishness of the judge or bishop. It is a whole different ball game, in which such persons get their appointment on the basis of having passed a test. The test is: will you obey instructions coming from the bad guys or will you be influenced by truth? If the latter, he/she won’t get the job.

We really need to stop propping up such a wicked system. Take a few minutes out of your super-busy day to notice that if you prop up such a system by your nodding to say a hoax about a school massacre, it will boomerang on you.

The entire apparatus of government will become wicked and you will be powerless to act. Poor you!

Fight it now, People. Pluck up your courage to say “A hoax is a hoax and it’s not OK to hoax us.”

Please follow and like us:

50 thoughts on “Mary Maxwell, America’s Downfall: the Sandy Hook Hoax Has Lasted Ten Years This Week”

  1. Who the hell are these subversive perverts to ruin your child’s life and scar them beyond repair? Someone of this type should not only be fired, they should be fined, imprisoned and never be allowed to deal with children again. Treat them as you would ANY SEXUAL PREDATOR because that is exactly what they are. This may make you puke….Scroll for the video.

      1. The boy in the video is talking about the 2002 Spider Man movie, so it was done after that. Which brings up a problem. Michael Vabner was born in 1995, he would be 7 when that movie came out. The boy in that video does not look or sound 7.

  2. Sandy Hook will continue in the media for many, many decades FULL Blast until people in the media and Congress REVOLT in mass protest with the TRUTH.

    It may well continue way, way, way past all of our lifetimes and then some.

    1. I have to agree……as much as I respect and am in awe of Jim’s continuing fight, ONE man will NEVER be allowed to bring this corruption to a close. It will take tens of millions and right now, the average American does not have the stomach for it….too soft and conditioned.

      1. Agreed, Will Two. People who live in CT tell me it is the most frightening crime ridden place they have ever lived. The government of CT advertises sub rosa in Sicily, Italy that all Mafia people are more than welcome to fly to CT and settle in that state. Criminals of all stripes are welcome to live in the State of CT. This is the rumor I read.

        Jim is fighting a brave fight against massive brick walls. The regime of CT is undisputedly perfidious.

      2. Sandy Hook is the first time in world history that so many people that are dead have suddenly risen from the DEAD and sang as a chorus. It must be a miracle of some sort, eh?


      3. Don…regarding your post of 12/15 at 9:54 PM….just commenting on Noah’s appearance….he looks a lot older than just a year plus later.. Would you not agree?
        Are any of these children age verifiable? I doubt it.

      4. Will 2, I’ve not really studied that pic of the chorus. I do know that there’s a lot of hocus pocus concerning that child.

      5. No offence, Don, but why post something that just muddies the waters of the truth we are attempting to put forth?

  3. Who is the little girl in the photo? Why is she also blowing out the candles? Does that boy look eight?. There is an obvious answer, it’s eight candles because those are twin four year olds.

    Compare what the kids look like in the above photos and this one.

    1. Compare them. “Noah” is clearly younger in the photo he links, which supports me, not him. “Noah” did not have a twin sister, which was just part of the fabricated script. And this IS a bona fide photo from a “Leonard Pozner” blog to which his closer friends had access. It’s real.

      1. I’m commenting on this photo because I noticed something I had not seen initially……not to dispute you or Mary’s findings. I’m absolutely all in SH was a major hoax. BUT, taking a close look at the picture on the right, underneath “Lenny Pozner”, there is a date which reads, Nov 27 2012.

      2. So that would be the day that Michael Vabner turned 8 years old, right? Is there another problem?

      3. I agree. I did not show him that photo. But Wolfgang had sent me a different version, which I may have shown to him. How did you learn that? That’s very interesting. Even I forgot I did that. I’ll look for it. I agree those group photos appear to be fake.

      4. Jim, he turned 8 in 2012? First, we know he was supposed to be 6 when he supposedly died, so how can he be 8 in a picture taken or sent (hard to tell) in November of 2012. I must be missing something. And he certainly can’t be 4 if we go by the twin hypothesis. I have no way of telling if that pic was taken in 2012 or sent via AT&T in 2012. If it was just sent on that date, then Noah could have been any age younger than 6. If that is an actual date on when the photo was taken, then he is eight in 2012.

      5. What you are missing is that “Noah” is a fiction made up out of photos of Michael Vabner when he was a child. There was no twin (who was a girl who looked enough like him to play his twin). The photo is bona fide. Perhaps “Leonard Pozner” did not post the photo on the date it was taken but years later. I will sort it out and get back. Meanwhile, give me your further thoughts.

      6. Assuming you are right about his birthdate and date of graduation from high school, then his 8th birthday would have been in 2003. So the photo was taken in 2003 but was only uploaded to this web site years later. What’s there to dispute, assuming I am right about the source? This was a very cleverly contrived event. They even had auditions for parts. Virtually every player is a fiction. And good to have him there on the day.

        Michael Vabner is seen in one of the seen at Sandy Hook videos.

        He was born in April ’95

        Michael HS graduation photo from 2013.

      7. Jim….your post of 4:05 PM today….No, I am not missing that Noah is a fiction. C’mon, I have your book.Before going much further (and I hinted at that in the last post) we have to determine if that is the actual date of the picture (of course, that could be manipulated, but why would Pozner do that…it works against what he has said) or the date it was sent. That has extreme significance.
        Now, if it was the date it was made and you, Jim, are saying it’s the fictional Noah’s 8th birthday, that would sure as heck go against Pozners “facts’. If it was the date it was sent, of course, who would know the age of Noah unless you are correct and the 8 candles represent his 8th birthday.
        I did notice in Bobin’s post of 2:40 PM today he claims the last link is Michael Vabner and his wife or a relative, Danielle and I assume one of their children on the right on Mother’s Day 2012 …8 months prior to the hoax. Is it not interesting those children on the left of the photo. look very much like Noah and what could be a twin sister and another girl. BUT, they could be photo shopped in quite easily.

      8. Not his twin sister (since he doesn’t have one; that’s only in the script) but someone who looks enough like him to be his twin. I have it authoritatively that it’s not photoshopped. So assuming it is of Michael Vabner celebrating his 8th birthday (which I have been assured it is), then why could it not have been posted years later?

      9. Jim….re your post of 6:37 PM…since I am not privy to the info you have, I’ll take your word and put it to rest.

      10. Will, the Mother’s Day photo is of all five Vabner/Pozner children. Danielle, Michael, Sofia, Noah and Arielle.

        Dr Fetzer, why is the girl next to Noah blowing out the candles?

        The issue you have is that just showing that photo is not proof. You could not show that photo to a jury and say that is eight year old Michael Vabner and that be it. You’d have to more evidence to prove they are the same person. Noah and Vabner had the same mother, any resemblance between the two is reasonable. Half siblings can look alike. Some do, some don’t. Other than photos what else can you show that proves Noah Pozner is Michael Vabner?

      11. I’m not talking about evidence of a hoax. I’m specifically talking about the claim of Noah Pozner and Michael Vabner being the same person. All I have seen is the photo where you say they are the same.

        Unless you have access to fingerprints and DNA, you can’t really prove 100% that Michael Vabner and Noah are the same person.

      12. Again though, you’re just going by the photo. You incorrectly refer to Michael as Noah’s step brother. There’s a big difference between step brothers and half brothers. A resemblance between step brothers would be unusual, but not half brothers who share a parent.

        Noah’s birth certificate exists, part of Michael’s has been shown that shows his birthdate. Pozner in the deposition mentioned that the ears of Michael and Noah do not match.

      13. Oh, WOW! You really are who I thought you were to begin with. We were very patient about this. Yes, sometimes I said “step brother’ and sometimes I said “half-brother”. I have one brother and three half-brothers. None of them look remotely alike. I am dumbfounded you are making this argument. We have done superpositions. They are one-and-the-same. You can take it to the bank. Now I am asking who you are and why you are here. But I think I already know the answer. How is it you know the deposition? Do you have the transcript? And if so how would you have obtained a copy? Isn’t it CONFIDENTIAL? Interesting.

      14. None of this has been authentic. You are playing games I don’t like. The Remington case even had all these records sealed–for the obvious reason that they would not hold up to scrutiny. All the families were synthetic and most were not even married. We are not in a court of law but with discovery, the fraud could be exposed to the last detail.

      15. If they made a minor tweak to a photo, that does not discount the proof that they are one-and-the-same. Look at the stunning and manifest similarities. We are not in court, but you are grasping after straws. There are plenty of other photos of “Noah”, where you can see they have the same ears as well as the same eyes, same nose, same mouth, same skull, etc. Uou agree it was a hoax, right?

      16. I’m not 100% sold on the hoax theory because too much of the evidence is based on opinion. Such as saying someone in a photo looks like someone else.

        There’s also claims that have been made but never followed up with evidence. Such as Halbig’s claim that the media checked into a hotel a couple of days before the 14th. He said he had a recording of a phone of the hotel manager saying that. That recording has not been played. That would be evidence it was pre planned, if the recording can be substantiated. Why hasn’t he played that recording or given it to someone for them to play it? I think we’d all like to hear it.

      17. About the condition of the school. There have been claims the school had mold. Rebecca Carnes brought up, what looks like mold on the baseboards could have been just dirt from a circular floor sweeper. That’s not impossible. Are their any documents or reports that show the school tested positive for mold between 2008 and 2012? A report would mean more than just a photo. The reports are what’s missing from the evidence presented.

      18. Re Bobin’s post of December 15, 2022 at 4:20 pm…..Here’s the Doctors info….maybe someone can call him and not be arrested for harassment…..

        Daniel A Goldstein Age 55 (May 1967)
        Current Address
        4 Buck Trl
        Sandy Hook, CT 06482

        Phone Numbers
        (203) 426-0437 – Landline
        (203) 218-7172 – Wireless
        (203) 667-7205 – Wireless
        (203) 426-0000 – Landline
        (203) 730-8789 – Landline

      19. The birth certificate was released years ago, so Dr Fetzer could have contacted him and brought Dr Goldstein in for a deposition.

    2. Bobin, referring to your post of 5:47 12/14…I don’t know if that photo was in the deposition (maybe Jim can say), but there is no way that photo would stand up in discovery. We don’t know the source or any info re the picture. No offence to anyone, but I don’t see how that could be used as evidence. There’s just no way to prove they are the same persons.

      1. No. It came from Leonard Pozner’s own personal web page, where it was shared with me by someone who had access.

      2. OK. I agree. Those photos (and there are several) appear to be fraudulent. I believe they were produced to mislead students of Sandy Hook. We are on the same page. Thanks for clarifying!

  4. Wonderful article, Mary….But what’s next after SCOTUS and after AJ losing a billion dollar settlement, much less Jim’s losses? We know, but most Americans do not have the stomach for it. The truth will last through eternity. America will not…..UNLESS….unless what?…I dare anyone to say what it will take.


Leave a Reply