Jonas Alexis and Jim Fetzer, From Darwin to Deontology, Part II: Abortion, Social Engineering, and the Politics of Life and Death

Jonas E. Alexis and Jim Fetzer   Note to the reader: As previously noted, I (JEA) will begin by presenting my argument, which serves as a response to Fetzer’s points from our initial exchange. Fetzer’s reply will appear below. Part III will constitute the final stage of our discussion and will follow the same format. Should any questions remain unresolved, I have informed Fetzer that we can address them in the comment section. After the third phase, Kevin MacDonald has agreed to join the conversation, and we will continue from that…

Jonas Alexis and Jim Fetzer, From Darwin to Deontology: The Fetzer–Alexis Philosophical and Historical Debate (Part I)

Jonas Alexis and Jim Fetzer Note to the reader: The debate will proceed as follows: I (JEA) will first summarize key points of tension and outline some of the central issues, after which James Fetzer will respond. A second installment—published later, which may be considered the rebuttal period—will follow the same format. JEA: Following the publication of my article on the Kevin MacDonald and Nathan Cofnas debate, I received a correspondence from James Fetzer expressing his appreciation for the discussion. Fetzer is a distinguished Professor of Philosophy (Emeritus) at the University of Minnesota…

Joachim Hagopian, Exposed, Bribed and Blackmailed Biden to be Banished

Joachim Hagopian Respected journalist Mike Whitney’s January 12th Unz Review article title asks “Is Biden is being blackmailed to send US combat troops to Ukraine?” Why even ponder such pretense, when all the facts for years have proven that he is. We already know he is, so there’s no sense beating around the Bush anymore. Joe Biden has spent the last half century entrenched in corrosive corruption of the federal government, infested in perversion and blackmail control for far too many decades. On virtually all-important issues, Biden’s been a turnstile flip flopping more…

Supreme Court Has Decided to Overturn Roe v. Wade, Leaked Opinion Suggests

By Matthew Vadum A document that Politico describes as an “initial draft majority opinion” written by Justice Samuel Alito suggests the Supreme Court has decided to strike down Roe v. Wade, the seminal precedent that in 1973 wrested the regulation of abortion from the states and made the procedure lawful throughout the entire United States. The leaking of the document, assuming the document is genuine and that it was in fact leaked, constitutes an unprecedented breach of Supreme Court protocol. In a 2,400-word article time-stamped 8:32 p.m. on May 2, Politico describes the draft opinion as “a…

California Gov. Gavin Newsom Plans to Mirror Texas’ Anti-Abortion Law to Ban Assault Weapons

SIMONE CARTER California leadership could soon be thanking Texas for sharing its legislative blueprints. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Lone Star State’s abortion ban to stay in effect. (Providers can still challenge the law in court.) The decision so “outraged” California Gov. Gavin Newsom that he announced plans to use Texas’ legal mechanism for a ban on assault-style weapons. Newsom, a Democrat, said if Texas can “endanger lives” through its abortion ban, then California should be allowed to ban “deadly weapons of war and save lives.” “If…

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No.19-1392 on the docket of the United States Supreme Court

John Remington Graham [Editor’s note: During my 35 years offering courses logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning, my students and I engaged in endless debates about abortion, where I was simply astounded at how much more they knew about birth control and the varied circumstances under which a woman might find it inadvisable to bring a new member into her family. My own opinion is that Roe v. Wade has been among the wisest decisions ever rendered by the United States Supreme Court, where it predicates that the first “right…