Tag: Sandy Hook

Susan Bradford, Jim Fetzer Meets the Criminal Justice System

James Fetzerblog

Susan Bradford [Editor’s note: Strictly speaking, of course, a defamation case does not qualify as a criminal proceeding, where I have added a few videos and blogs to round out the story. But Susan explained to me the intentional ambiguity: the justice system itself has become “criminal”! I think she has a point.] In 1971, economists admonished President Richard Nixon against implementing Secretary of Commerce Peter Peterson’s recommendation to replace the gold-backed dollar with a fiat currency. Granting the Federal Reserve the authority to create unlimited amounts of money would…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., CONSPIRACY 101: Critical Thinking & Conspiracy Theories

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Having offered courses in critical thinking, logic, and scientific reasoning for 35 years as a professor of philosophy, I want to give back to America by explaining how to figure out what really happened using appropriate principles of methodology, epistemology, and the philosophy of science. You will not only learn how to identify “false flag” or staged events but possess a deeper understanding of the nature of mine, the character of thought and the means for thinking things through. As I used to say to my students…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., Evaluating Moral Theories

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Evaluating Moral Theories* ABSTRACT: False beliefs about right and wrong are boundless, where students would benefit from learning that there are objective criteria on the basis of which they can be evaluating, leading to rational conclusions about the nature of morality. The classic Hempelian Criteria of Adequacy for evaluating scientific theories has a parallel by means of counterpart Criteria of Adequacy for evaluating moral theories. Counterpart Criteria are introduced here, where their analytical significance has been exemplified in relation to eight theories of morality, four of which…

Jim Fetzer, Princeton in the Nation’s Service, Class of ’62 Style (II)

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer ’62   “‘It’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’s been fooled”–attributed to Mark Twain   Dear Classmates,   Now that Drayton has presented his class lecture on the importance of character, “Character Matters”, I write to make a final plea as to whether the Class of ’62 has any character. The very idea that Tom Dunn, a real estate lawyer who appears to have no grasp of the principle, “Innocent until Proven Guilty” or of standards of proof (since I have refuted the claim…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., Motion to Recuse Judge Frank Remington Pursuant to Wis. Stats. 757.19(2)(g)

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Not to suggest a comedy of errors, but my Motion to Open Judgment Pursuant to Extrinsic Fraud and Fraud upon the Court (17 June 2024) prompted the Circuit Court Judge presiding over my case, The Honorable Frank Remington, to deny the motion without soliciting a response from the Plaintiff and my reply, which was a violation of the Wisconsin Rules of Judicial Procedure. When I protested by filing a Request for Relief from Judgment or Order (20 June 2024), he did it again! This was such a…

Wisconsin Dane County Judge Remington rips Due Process in Sandy Hook appeal: Calls Wisconsin law “factually and legally” not applicable in litigation!

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Wisconsin Dane County Judge Remington rips due process in Sandy Hook appeal: Calls Wisconsin law “factually and legally” not applicable in litigation! Denies State of Connecticut Emergency Management website is judicially recognizable evidence on its face June 26, 2024–James Fetzer, PhD, University of Minnesota Professor Emeritus, was sued for defamation for his 425-page book “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control” (2015; 2nd ed., 2016), the redacted edition of which can now be downloaded from Fetzer’s blog. For background, try reading Kevin Barrett’s…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., Motion to Open Judgment Pursuant to Extrinsic Fraud and Fraud Upon the Court

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Having carried my Sandy Hook case from Dane County Circuit Court to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals (District IV) and the Wisconsin Supreme Court and then going to the United States Supreme Court (all to no avail), it became apparent that my only option was to expose the fraud behind the fraud (the Extrinsic Fraud) and the complicity of the Court and the attorneys for the Plaintiff, Leonard Pozner (the Fraud upon the Court). I had suggested from the beginning that Leonard Pozner was not a real…

Mike Stone, Gaslighting is the MSM’s Purpose

James Fetzerblog

Mike Stone Everything you see or hear coming from the mainstream media is a lie.  Not some of it, not most of it, all of it.   To substantiate what I’ve just said, let’s look at some recent examples.   In October of 2023, the mainstream media told us that Israel was hit with a surprise attack by Hamas. So applying our rule of opposites, we knew right away that it wasn’t a surprise attack at all.   Sure enough, we now have confirmation that Israel had prior knowledge of the “surprise…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., The Demolition of Justice in the USA

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. The latest affront to the administration of justice has come from the decision in the E. Jean Carroll “fantasy” trial, where a woman who appears to be obsessed with sex has won a staggering $83.3 million verdict against Donald Trump for an alleged defamation for denying her claim that he had raped her at a Bergdorf Goodman store, where she cannot even remember the year of its occurrence. A woman who has been raped (absent roofies) will not ony remember the year but the month, the week, the…

Paul Craig Roberts, In Court Cases Facts Are Losing Their Relevancy as They Have in News Reporting, Scholarship, and Science

James Fetzerblog

Paul Craig Roberts [Editor’s note: The Sandy Hook lawsuits provide a perfect illustration, where none of them has been decided on the basis of its merits by being sent to a jury to determine the facts. They have been decided on the basis of assumption, presupposition, or (in the case of Alex Jones), alleged failures of discovery. My own came the closest, where Wisconsin allows judges to set aside evidence it considers to be “unreasonable”. Thus was a massive conflict in alleged facts resolved by simply “setting aside” all of…