Tag: Sandy Hook

WATCH: Alex Jones Breaks Down His Historic Civil Rights Lawsuit Against The DOJ-Run, Weaponized Lawfare Sandy Hook Litigation Against Him & The First Amendment

James Fetzerblog

Infowars.com WATCH: Alex Jones Breaks Down His Historic Civil Rights Lawsuit Against The DOJ-Run, Weaponized Lawfare Sandy Hook Litigation Against Him & The First Amendment Bottom line: The revolution is NOW & the globalists are going down! Alex Jones joined The American Journal broadcast Friday to get his audience up to speed on his historic counterclaim against the weaponized lawfare against him and the American people: DOWNLOAD THE COUNTERCLAIM HERE! Read Jones’ second amended counterclaim below: Watch live for latest developments! Read more: Alex Jones Files Historic Civil Rights Lawsuit In Bankruptcy Court, Alleging Constitutional…

BREAKING: Alex Jones Files Historic Civil Rights Lawsuit In Bankruptcy Court, Alleging Constitutional Violations in Sandy Hook Defamation Judgment

James Fetzerblog

Infowars.com BREAKING: Alex Jones Files Historic Civil Rights Lawsuit In Bankruptcy Court, Alleging Constitutional Violations in Sandy Hook Defamation Judgment Alex Jones fights back against $1.5 billion judgment, claiming plaintiffs colluded with the state to deprive him of constitutional rights! “The Connecticut court’s actions turned private litigants into extensions of the state, bypassing constitutional safeguards in a case about public discourse on a national tragedy.” Infowars host Alex Jones has filed a second amended counterclaim against the Sandy Hook families, arguing defendants colluded with the State of Connecticut to deprive…

Kevin Barrett, Dr. Richard Ellefritz on the Fallacies of Anti-Conspiracy Discourse

James Fetzerblog

Kevin Barrett [Editor’s note: For more, see “What’s Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?” (17 April 2021),.] Who’s irrational, the “conspiracy theorists” or the academicians who are paid to attack them with ad hominems, circular arguments, and other fallacies? I’ve opined on this before. Now let’s find out what a genuine expert—sociologist and expert on conspiracy movements Richard Ellefritz—thinks. He’s an assistant professor of sociology at the University of the Bahamas, and the author of numerous articles on this and related topics. Kevin Barrett: Welcome to Truth Jihad Audiovisual. I’m Kevin Barrett and I’ve been…

Donald Jeffries, Charlie Kirk, Epstein, and the Zionist Cabal

James Fetzerblog

Donald Jeffries  America 2.0’s Gunboat Dishonesty Thomas Paine began his classic revolutionary pamphlet Common Sense with “These are the times that try men’s souls.” Imagine what old Tom would think of these times. Our souls are literally on trial; the satanic forces that thoroughly run this world vying against a faith in all that’s good and right, which some of us cling to fiercely. The Charlie Kirk assassination, or whatever it was, is not going quietly into Dylan Thomas’s good night. Candace Owens alone is seeing to that. Candace has…

Susan Bradford, Jim Fetzer Meets the Criminal Justice System

James Fetzerblog

Susan Bradford [Editor’s note: Strictly speaking, of course, a defamation case does not qualify as a criminal proceeding, where I have added a few videos and blogs to round out the story. But Susan explained to me the intentional ambiguity: the justice system itself has become “criminal”! I think she has a point.] In 1971, economists admonished President Richard Nixon against implementing Secretary of Commerce Peter Peterson’s recommendation to replace the gold-backed dollar with a fiat currency. Granting the Federal Reserve the authority to create unlimited amounts of money would…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., CONSPIRACY 101: Critical Thinking & Conspiracy Theories

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Having offered courses in critical thinking, logic, and scientific reasoning for 35 years as a professor of philosophy, I want to give back to America by explaining how to figure out what really happened using appropriate principles of methodology, epistemology, and the philosophy of science. You will not only learn how to identify “false flag” or staged events but possess a deeper understanding of the nature of mine, the character of thought and the means for thinking things through. As I used to say to my students…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., Evaluating Moral Theories

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Evaluating Moral Theories* ABSTRACT: False beliefs about right and wrong are boundless, where students would benefit from learning that there are objective criteria on the basis of which they can be evaluating, leading to rational conclusions about the nature of morality. The classic Hempelian Criteria of Adequacy for evaluating scientific theories has a parallel by means of counterpart Criteria of Adequacy for evaluating moral theories. Counterpart Criteria are introduced here, where their analytical significance has been exemplified in relation to eight theories of morality, four of which…

Jim Fetzer, Princeton in the Nation’s Service, Class of ’62 Style (II)

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer ’62   “‘It’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’s been fooled”–attributed to Mark Twain   Dear Classmates,   Now that Drayton has presented his class lecture on the importance of character, “Character Matters”, I write to make a final plea as to whether the Class of ’62 has any character. The very idea that Tom Dunn, a real estate lawyer who appears to have no grasp of the principle, “Innocent until Proven Guilty” or of standards of proof (since I have refuted the claim…

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., Motion to Recuse Judge Frank Remington Pursuant to Wis. Stats. 757.19(2)(g)

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Not to suggest a comedy of errors, but my Motion to Open Judgment Pursuant to Extrinsic Fraud and Fraud upon the Court (17 June 2024) prompted the Circuit Court Judge presiding over my case, The Honorable Frank Remington, to deny the motion without soliciting a response from the Plaintiff and my reply, which was a violation of the Wisconsin Rules of Judicial Procedure. When I protested by filing a Request for Relief from Judgment or Order (20 June 2024), he did it again! This was such a…

Wisconsin Dane County Judge Remington rips Due Process in Sandy Hook appeal: Calls Wisconsin law “factually and legally” not applicable in litigation!

James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. Wisconsin Dane County Judge Remington rips due process in Sandy Hook appeal: Calls Wisconsin law “factually and legally” not applicable in litigation! Denies State of Connecticut Emergency Management website is judicially recognizable evidence on its face June 26, 2024–James Fetzer, PhD, University of Minnesota Professor Emeritus, was sued for defamation for his 425-page book “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control” (2015; 2nd ed., 2016), the redacted edition of which can now be downloaded from Fetzer’s blog. For background, try reading Kevin Barrett’s…