Tag: 9/11

Mark H Gaffney, Did the Plowshares Program Set the Stage for Nuclear Terrorism on September 11?

James Fetzerblog

MARK H. GAFFNEY Skeptics have pointed to the alleged absence of radiation at ground zero as proof that nuclear weapons were not used to demolish the twin towers in New York City on September 11, 2001. This argument, however, is a logical fallacy that can never rise to the level of proof because the alleged absence of radiation is not evidence of its absence. Such thinking is a red herring that, unfortunately, has set back the cause of 9/11 truth by many years. The subject of nukes has been taboo…

Mary Maxwell, Time To Overturn Marbury v Madison? Too Bad Scotus Botched 9/11

James Fetzerblog

Mary Maxwell, LL.B., Ph.D. Did the Framers of the US Constitution in 1787 genuinely wrack their brains to come up every possible power-constraining mechanism for citizens to use against an evil government? I don’t know.  But, as I will argue below, any omissions on their part can be filled in by other mechanisms that are present in the Constitution. Don’t give up hope! One huge omission at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787 was the Founders’ failure to raise the question: What if some Americans become so wealthy that they can…

Jack Mullen, 22 YEARS LATER, NEVER FORGET 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB

James Fetzerblog

Jack Mullen (Editor’s note) – 22 years ago, on 9/11/01, Israeli operatives, the Bush administration, Larry Silverstein, the news media, and many others helped premeditate the murders of nearly 3000 Americans using the story that nineteen al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four commercial airplanes on a suicidal mission to destroy the twin towers in NYC. The media covered extensively what was claimed to be a terrorist strike ordered and planned by Osama Bin Laden. However, as the years have passed and more extensive investigations have been published, Americans can clearly see that…

Jerm Warfare, James Fetzer on the 9/11 coverup

James Fetzerblog

By Jeremy Neil I have hosted a few 9/11 conversations, from Mike Berger arguing that controlled demolition was used, to Judy Wood’s hypothesis surrounding Directed Energy Weapons. For clarity, the official story is as follows. On 11 September, 2001, a series of coordinated terrorist attacks took place in the United States. Nineteen hijackers associated with the extremist group Al-Qaeda hijacked four commercial aircraft. Two of the planes were flown into the North and South Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, causing their subsequent collapse within hours. Another plane was flown into the…

Joachim Hagopian, Armenian Genocide 2.0? One Step Closer with Armenia-US Joint Military Exercise on 9/11

James Fetzerblog

Joachim Hagopian In an interview with Italian newspaper La Repubblica published on Sunday September 3rd, Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan made the following statements: Armenia’s security architecture was 99.999% linked to Russia, including when it came to the procurement of arms and ammunition. But today we see that Russia itself is in need of weapons, arms and ammunition (for the war in Ukraine) and in this situation it’s understandable that even if it wishes so, the Russian Federation cannot meet Armenia’s security needs. This example should demonstrate to us that dependence on just one…

Patrick J. McShay, Global Warming And Other Government Lies

James Fetzerblog

Patrick J. McShay “The era of global warming has ended and the era of global boiling has begun” — United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres “We shall know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American people believes is false. ” — William Casey, Former CIA Director “The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” — William Colby, Former CIA Director The people who insist that wildfires and extreme weather are evidence of global warming are the same people who insist that there is no evidence of…

David Neal, Why the Assassination of JFK Matters to Us Today

James Fetzerblog

By David Neal To keep the peace and defend the country are a U.S. President’s primary duty. Contrary to many shallow historians, President John F. Kennedy was not going into Vietnam with ground troops; he was pulling 1000 “advisors” out in Dec 1963, all the rest of them by 1965. (see NSAM 263).  He was murdered on Nov 22, 1963, one month before the first 1000 could be pulled out.  Lyndon Johnson reversed this order with NSAM273 four days after the murder and by March 1965 500,000 American soldiers were in Vietnam. The…

‘Special’ service: Declassified Guantanamo court filing suggests some 9/11 hijackers were CIA agents

James Fetzerblog

RT HomeWorld News What does the intelligence agency have to do with the suicide terrorist attack?   [Editor’s note: As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, I have done extensive collaborative research on 9/11 and have been flown around the world to lecture about it. I have summarized our findings in many places, which can be accessed on-line. I am embedding one of my best.]   An explosive court filing from the Guantanamo Military Commission – a court considering the cases of defendants accused of carrying out the “9/11” terrorist attacks…

James Perloff, Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt’s 9/11

James Fetzerblog

James Perloff [Author’s note: For those who would prefer to read this post in hard copy, it is Chapter Four of my book Thirteen Pieces of the Jigsaw.] On the morning of December 7, 1941, Japanese planes, launched from aircraft carriers, attacked the American fleet at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, sinking or heavily damaging 18 ships (including eight battleships), destroying 188 planes, and leaving over 2,000 servicemen killed. The next day, President Franklin D. Roosevelt denounced this “day of infamy” before Congress, from whom he secured an avid declaration of…

Harmeet K. Dhillon, The Politicization of the Department of Justice

James Fetzerblog

Harmeet K. Dhillon The following is adapted from a speech delivered on September 16, 2022, in Washington, D.C., at Hillsdale College’s Constitution Day Celebration. The seal of the U.S. Department of Justice reads, “Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur”—“Who prosecutes for Lady Justice.” Depictions of Lady Justice are as familiar as they are instructive: she stands blindfolded while holding the scales of justice, representing her unyielding devotion to equal justice under the law. Contrary to this ideal, the DOJ today appears to be increasingly motivated by partisanship. Compounding the problem, it…